I posted this vanity so that we might have a way to counter the continual nonsense about Hunter only being at 1%.
And why do these guys waste their time on a supposed 1%er anyways? Because they know that he’s got more of a following than the MSM polls generate in their biased approach.
On all the websites that let you choose the candidate by your views on issues....Duncan Wins! Hunter is the best on the issues, now we’ve just got to get through the media blackout.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1915780/posts
Like Online Dating Sites, The Web Matches Voters, Presidential Candidates
Tancredo landed just behind the top conservative match, U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.[snip]
This survey also has Hunter on top. When issues and votes are considered, Hunter comes out ahead.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/projects/ongoing/select_a_candidate/poll.php?race_id=13
“I posted this vanity so that we might have a way to counter the continual nonsense about Hunter only being at 1%.”
They only bring that up because that is all they’ve got, poor devils.
It seems that posters who say Hunter has 1% are making it up.
“..Rep. Duncan Hunter of California received 3 percent, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas received 2 percent, Sen. Brownback of Kansas received 1 percent and Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado received 1 percent.”
snip from http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/16/schneider.poll/index.html
And this poll isn’t brand new.