Posted on 10/28/2007 11:05:05 AM PDT by blam
Nah, just ignore them.
bmflr
That is the nice thing about tree rings; you have an exact date with which to calibrate other dating methods, as well as the historical record against which to cross-check the tree ring.
Ahem, looks like they'll have to shift the date of the Exodus, huh?
New Ice-Core Evidence Challenges the 1620s age for the Santorini (Minoan) Eruption
Journal of Archaeological Science,
Volume 25, Issue 3, March 1998, Pages 279-289
13 July 1997 | Gregory A. Zielinski, Mark S. Germani
Posted on 07/29/2004 3:25:45 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1180724/posts
ARCHAEOLOGY: New Carbon Dates Support Revised History of Ancient Mediterranean
Science Magazine | 4/28/2006 | Michael Balter
Posted on 04/27/2006 7:59:30 PM EDT by Lessismore
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1622847/posts
[particularly message 25]
Ancient Volcano, Seeds And Treerings,
Suggest Rewriting Late Bronze Age Mediterranean History (More)
Cornell University | 4-28-2006 | Alex Kwan
Posted on 04/29/2006 3:24:20 PM EDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1623821/posts
Sinai pumice linked to ancient eruption [...not!]
Yahoo | Monday, April 2, 2007 | Katarina Kratovac w/ contrib by Nicholas Paphits
Posted on 04/07/2007 12:08:27 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1813465/posts
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
So, you’ve rec’d it, read it, and did like it? :’)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1912063/posts?page=5#5
-and-
“Doubting the Story of Exodus.”
Source: Jewish World Review
Published: April 23, 2001 Author: Dennis Prager
Posted on 04/23/2001 12:15:31 PDT by jasowas
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ae47f533d21.htm
Yup. I'm left with one unanswered question though. They said that the 'rims' on the Carolina Bays could only have been formed by the extreme heat from an impact and/or some type acid. Then they go on to say that the Bays were formed by bigs chunks of flying ice. So???
They side with the impact scenario, in their case the impactors were ejecta from a single, large, northerly impact (more than one, an apparent doublet impact).
[rimshot!]
Shouldn’t that be the other way around?
[rimshot!]
Geoarchaeology:"Artifacts from Akrotiri, linked to the Egyptian calendar [sic] put the Thera eruption at more than a hundred years later [than 1644 +/- 20 BC]. While the controversy remains open, it is our view that the volcanic activity recorded in the Greenland ice core more likely came from nearby Iceland than from the eastern Mediterranean (this may be testable by any chemical signature). [p 158-159]
The Earth-Science Approach to Archaeological Interpretation
by George (Rip) Rapp, Jr. and Christopher L. Hill
reprised from here
"Living samples from a freshwater lake on limestone terrain have been known to give a radiocarbon date of up to 1600 BP." [p 166]
That is one of the poorest things to use for a radiocarbon date. Freshwater shellfish from limestone environments are equally bad.
There are ways to calibrate those kinds of samples but it is easier to use more reliable materials to start with.
There is a large body of literature on this problem.
The soil of Santorini is enriched in C12, and this has an impact on the RC dating of stuff on the island, including plants grown in the soil (samples from still-living plants having a much higher RC date). Seems like thermoluminescence, electron spin resonance, and perhaps other forms of radiological dating would be a better choice.
Sounds more like the soil, or some components of it, are deficient in C14. I know limestone can do this, but I am not sure how volcanic soils would do the same.
I would be curious to know that the C13/C12 ratio is, as that is often a good indicator of problems with C14, and it reflects on the material you are dating.
This is the kind of thing you have to watch out for in C14 dating.
Normally we date several different materials and compare, when possible, against other dating methods.
Yes, that was imprecise of me... the soil is deficient in C14.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.