Posted on 10/27/2007 9:01:09 PM PDT by freedomdefender
Out of context? LOL!
The most popular documents on Abortion and Stem Cell Research:
1. Life and Liberty Ron Paul 2008 Web site
2. Rights of Taxpayers is Missing Element in Stem Cell Debate Ron Paul Newsletter, June 25, 2007
3. Pro-Life Action Must Originate from Principle Ron Paul Speech to Congress, June 4, 2003
4. No Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research Ron Paul Speech to Congress, May 24, 2005
5. The Partial Birth Abortion Ban Ron Paul Speech to Congress, June 4, 2003
6. Pro-Life Politics? Ron Paul Newsletter, March 28, 2005
7. Federalizing Social Policy Ron Paul Newsletter, January 30, 2006
8. Respect for Life begins with Respect for the Constitutional Rule of Law Ron Paul Newsletter, April 30, 2001
9. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2000 Ron Paul Speech to Congress, April 5, 2000
12 other documents on Abortion and Stem Cell Research:
1. Statement of Faith The Covenant News, July 21, 2007
2. Honoring Pope John Paul II- A Consistent Pro-life Figure Ron Paul Speech to Congress, April 6, 2005
3. No Federal Funding for Abortion! Ron Paul Speech to Congress, April 2, 2003
4. The Tragedy of Partial-Birth Abortion Ron Paul Speech to Congress, July 24, 2002
5. Introduction of the "Human Cloning Prevention Act of 2001" Ron Paul Speech to Congress, December 13, 2001
6. Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning Ron Paul Speech to Congress, July 31, 2001
7. Statement on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act Ron Paul Speech to Congress, April 26, 2001
8. Limitation on Funds for Abortion, Family Planning, or Population Control Efforts Ron Paul Speech to Congress, July 13, 2000
9. The Partial Birth Abortion and Judicial Limitation Act Ron Paul Speech to Congress, February 16, 2000
10. Punishing accidents, ignoring murder Ron Paul Newsletter, September 20, 1999
11. Abortion and National Sovereignty: No Compromises Ron Paul Newsletter, January 26, 1998
12. Being Pro-Life Is Necessary to Defend Liberty Libertarians for Life, 1981
NH is Ron Paul’s chance because it’s a small state and independents can vote in either party’s primary. So Paul is probably going to go for broke here.
Thanks, I forgot about that. You forgot to mention that in addition to being anti-nation building Ron Paul tortures little caterpillars with a magnifying glass and has a stash of Playboy magazines under his bed.
I did not know about the caterpillers or the Playboy magazines, but I do not care about them. I am only concerned about him being a blame America first anti-American who is only concerned with us losing the WOT so he can continue to say “I told you so”. He would rather have the terrorists attacking us on our soil than having us win the WOT.
So I guess you’re not going to be meeting travis at the next Ron Paul meetup group.
In all seriousness, there is a little bit of a difference between Ron Paul who was against nation building from day one and the liberals like Hillary who were all in favor of it when the polls told them it was a good idea and now are opposed to it because their voters want instant results and will therefor pander to them and do anything to stay in power, including sabotaging their own military for political gain.
Now that we are already there, we might as well treat Iraq like the Terrorist Roach Motel...the jihadis check in, but they don’t check out.
You can take stupidity so far IMO.
No way Ron Paul supporters can be conservative and that dumb, so don’t worry about it.
That description fits only if you also classify George Washington as a blame-America-first anti-American. Paul's foreign policy is taken straight out of the Constitution, and out of the clear doctrine of George Washington (read Washington's Farewell Address; because our public schools are so dumbed down today, most Americans are no longer familiar with Washingont's words - words that were well-known to previous generations of Americans, when the schools taught American history and government.) By the way, Paul also wants to abolish the US Dept of Education. Great idea!
The paleoPaulfraud will do something or other IF he eats regular. What he WON'T do is anything effective against abortion. After thirty five years or so of Roe vs. Wade cramming 50+ million slaughters of innocent babies down the throats of Americans on the excuse that somehow the constitution (all here genuflect to the founding demigods) guarantees the right of each woman to slaughter her unborn child in cahoots with some sorry excuse for a physician (why? Because the elites want the right of their precious little Skippers and Muffies to kill the elitists' conceived grandchildren lest Muffy or Skipper be embarrassed by the natural results of their own irreesponsible misbehavior!)
How many babies Dr. Demento delivered is utterly irrelevant. What is at issue is what the fraudulent phony would ACTUALLY DO to end abortion in America. Lest there be misunderstanding: End means just that not merely make it possible for any or all of 50 random jurisdictions to end abortion. If NYC and LA and Chicago want abortion, it is the poor who are killed and the elite are delighted. If abortion mills flourish in La Jolla, and Brookline and more fashionable venues, that helps Mr. and Mrs. Elite to shield little Muffie and Skipper (the wind tunnel next generation of those elites who are, at least in their own minds, gods not to be trifled with by mere peasants).
All of the "consttutionalist" eccentrics would do better to focus their fire on federal involvement in education, federal regulations not specifically
If Ron runs for 3rd party, the main votes he’d end up getting are the anti-war reagan democrats. Most conservatives or libertarians (lower case) who generally agree with Ron would vote Republican (unless its Guiliani)
So did the Republican establishment --- until George got elected.
I don’t want either NY representative for President.
Hillary is much worse though.
No one—including Republicans—believed abortion was covered by the 5th or 14th when Roe vs Wade was done and maybe only 1-3% do now. To pinpoint this only on Ron Paul is ludicrous. What bill did the Republicans introduced with the house/senate/whitehouse in 2000-2006 to ban abortion?? (Hint there is none). Ron Paul has done more to crusade against abortion than most and has said that he would have a litmus test for SC justice to overturn Roe vs Wade, this is far more conservative on abortion than 90% of Republicans running for office and none of the main candidates have stated they would have that requirement. In short, you are full of it.
That we definitely agree on.
Ron Paul’s views on abortion are indistinguishible from John Kerry’s.
In the 2004 election debates, John Kerry said he personally opposed abortion but he would not use the power of the presidency to abolish abortion if elected. No one considered John Kerry to be pro-life.
Ron Paul says he opposes abortion but he said he would leave it up to the states, ie, he would not use the power of the presidency to abolish abortion if elected.
I’ll accept Ron Paul as pro-life when you convince me John Kerry was pro-life.
authorized by the fedconstitution, repealing the New Deal, Fair Deal, New Frontier, getting the US out of the foreign aid racket, repealing that portion of the constitution (the supremacy clause mention of treaties) which frighteningly places treaties on a par with the constitution itself (Article VI?) and a bunch of other things instead of joining with Planned Barrenhood and the anti-infant Nazis and using the constitution as an excuse.
Meanwhile, another 1.5 million will be sliced, diced and hamburgerized by surgical abortion alone this year and next year and the year after that while the paleonincompoops like Dr. Demento sit around doing nothing, wringing their hands, posing for holy pictures and absolutely REFUSING to do ANYTHING effective to stop the slaughter. To top it off, he also poses for holy pictures worrying oh soooooo much about the American military death toll in the 4 1/2 year Iraq War which (while certainly regrettable as are all premature deaths and particularly since these are the deaths of those better than Dr. Demento by far) that likely will not reach the MONTHLY toll of death on the American highways in the 1960s.
] Let the elitist fraud, phony and stooge be limited to his natural constituency of the Americong and be swept out of his Congressional nomination by Chris Peden. It may well be that ANY GOP nominee except for cross-dressing Julie Annie will appoint justices who would repeal Roe. Repealing Roe is fine but more is needed. That more is the recognition constitutionally of the unborn as "persons" for legal purposes. Dr. Demento can be counted on top resist "personhood" to his dying breath. Therefore his claims of being "pro-life" are irrelevant since, as usual in his foreign and other policies, he favors DOING NOTHING.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.