Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jail time in store for all AZ crossers
Arizona Daily Star ^ | Brady McCombs

Posted on 10/27/2007 10:36:08 AM PDT by SandRat

Illegal border crossers arrested along Arizona's stretch of U.S.-Mexican border will soon find themselves facing two weeks to six months in jail, which now is reserved only for repeat crossers and those with criminal records.

The sector is working toward a zero-tolerance program known as "Operation Streamline" that is now used in the Yuma and Del Rio sectors, U.S. Border Patrol Tucson Sector Chief Robert W. Gilbert told a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security subcommittee Wednesday. The program is also set to start soon in the Laredo Sector.

The program creates a deterrent that dramatically alters the dynamics along the border.

First-time offenders would be charged with a misdemeanor "entry without inspection," which carries a jail sentence of 15 to 180 days. Repeat offenders could be charged with felony re-entry and imprisoned up to two years.

Most illegal entrants from Mexico apprehended here are currently allowed to return home voluntarily unless a records check shows they have been detained repeatedly or have a criminal history. Only a small fraction of the illegal crossers are prosecuted.

That catch-and-release system, which has been in place since the early 1970s, created an empty threat to many illegal border crossers, said Robert Boatright, the new deputy chief in the Tucson Sector.

"There has to be a consequence. There is little or no consequence until you go to a Streamline-type process," said Boatright, the right-hand man to Gilbert. "It's going to be a change in paradigm; there are going to be consequences to illegal immigration."

Officials are in the process of meeting with representatives from the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Marshals, U.S. Magistrate and Public Defenders Office, among others, to iron out the logistics of implementing the new policy. Officials hope to implement the program it as soon as possible, preferably within the fiscal year, which began on Oct. 1, he said.

Border Patrol officials Wednesday did not elaborate on plans in the Tucson Sector, but Andrea Zortman, an agency spokeswoman, said they are evaluating the entire Southwest border to determine which sectors would benefit from the program.

"It sends a message out that if you cross the border you have committed a crime and we are not going to tolerate that," Zortman said. "In essence, it serves as a deterrent."

Track record of success

Officials in both the Del Rio and Yuma sectors have reported dramatic decreases in apprehensions since launching the operation.

In Yuma, which implemented it in December 2006, apprehensions decreased by 68 percent in fiscal year 2007, said Jeremy Schappell, Border Patrol Yuma Sector spokesman. Officials there attribute that to additional fencing, lighting, agents and Operation Streamline. From Oct. 1, 2006, through Sept. 12, 2007, 1,572 illegal entrants were prosecuted under the program, he said.

Nearly all illegal border crossers apprehended end up going to a detention facility south of Phoenix where the average stay is 30 days, he said. The only exceptions are humanitarian cases such as parents with children and the elderly, he said.

"Before, they knew if they got caught, they could try again in a few hours," Schappell said. "Now, when we catch them, they don't have that opportunity anymore. They know when they get caught, they are looking at about 30 days. That's 30 days of income they don't have for their families."

In Del Rio, which initiated Streamline in 2005, apprehensions decreased by 38 percent in the first year. But Yuma and Del Rio apprehend a fraction of the illegal entrants that the Tucson Sector does. Through August of fiscal year 2007, Del Rio ranked eighth out of nine border sectors with 21,000 apprehensions; Yuma was seventh with 38,000.

"We're catching on average 20 aliens a day so we are not running into the problem where we're being overrun with bodies," Schappell said.

The Tucson Sector has been the busiest along the southern border for the past decade. In fiscal year 2007, the sector recorded a Southwest-border high 378,000 apprehensions, 43 percent of all arrests, Gilbert said. The 897,000 pounds of marijuana seized in the sector were also the most and accounted for 48 percent of all seizures on the southern border, he said. That level of activity makes the Tucson Sector an ideal spot to try the program, but it also presents a logistical challenge.

Like Del Rio and Yuma, plans here are to start with implementation in a specific stretch or corridor before branching out little by little to include the entire 262-miles in the Tucson Sector, which stretches from the western edge of New Mexico to the eastern edge of Yuma County, Boatright said.

With more than 700 apprehensions a day here, it's the only way to make the program manageable, he said. There will be a predetermined numerical limit to the number of people that can be processed under the operation, he said.

Mixed reaction

The plan drew criticism from at least one local immigrants'-rights advocate who says the jail time is excessive and won't deter illegal border crossers. It earned praise from border security advocates who say it will make crossers think twice.

"It's not an effective deterrent," said Jennifer Allen, executive director of Tucson-based Border Action Network. "We have already seen that people are willing to risk their lives to come across this border; 15 days is nothing compared to taking the risk of your life." The mandatory detention will only delay the inevitable: people will try again when they are returned across the border, she said. Allen also worries how detention facilities already stretched to the limit will adequately handle a major influx of people.

But Neville Cramer, who worked as an Immigration and Naturalization Service special agent for 26 years and wrote two books on the illegal-immigration crisis, disagrees.

Time behind bars will create a significant deterrent that is more effective than fences, radar, cameras and barriers, he said.

Cramer has advocated for such a policy for years, saying it will prevent illegal entrants from being able to try to cross repeatedly and keeps them from working to earn money to send back home. He said children, pregnant women and people who are ill should not be detained.

"Word will get down to Mexico and Central America and that's going to make the trip north even more questionable," said Cramer, author of "Immigration Chaos: Solutions to an American Crisis." "The chances of getting in, getting a job and sending money back home are going to be even more doubtful."

The Mexican Consulate in Tucson declined to comment, saying it will wait until it receives official word of the program from the Border Patrol, said spokesman Alejandro Ramos Cardoso.

Though the program's logistical details and when it will start are unresolved, Border Patrol officials say they are confident the ramifications will be far-reaching. "It's going to result in impacts that echo down south," Boatright said.

On StarNet: For more in-depth border coverage, visit azstarnet.com/border.

● Contact reporter Brady McCombs at 573-4213 or bmccombs@azstarnet.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; jail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Roccus
They come here to work? Put ‘em on road gangs cleaning up all the trash.

They should clean up the trash they're leaving all over the border areas, including in some National Monuments. It's disgusting.

21 posted on 10/27/2007 12:20:33 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
"It's not an effective deterrent," said Jennifer Allen, executive director of Tucson-based Border Action Network.

Just like the death penalty isn't a deterrent. I'm not aware that any executed criminals have committed any more crimes, except perhaps voting for Democrats.

22 posted on 10/27/2007 12:23:44 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Jennifer Allen
BAN

Border Action Network
aka Border Alliance Group

This group is suspected of being closely tied to left-wing radical Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty Law Center, 'Mexican government agent' - vehement reconquista Isabel Garcia and her Aztlan gang, 'Derechos Humanos', and other anti-American groups.

Here...

Jennifer Allen, of Border Action Network, a Tucson- based immigrants' rights group. "The conditions for once are on our side." -- "The border has been discussed and reframed as if border communities are pawns to be moved around or don't even exist," Allen said.

23 posted on 10/27/2007 12:33:16 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

at least return them to a different place on the US border.


24 posted on 10/27/2007 12:44:35 PM PDT by farfromhome (What does this button d.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

...and why should we send people to prison for attempted murder? That’s just postponing the inevitable.


25 posted on 10/27/2007 12:54:49 PM PDT by farfromhome (What does this button d.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; SandRat
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is the guy you are thinking of.

Yep...that's the guy!

26 posted on 10/27/2007 1:11:28 PM PDT by econjack ("Wherever you go, there you are.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Give the invaders something useful to do prior to deportation.


27 posted on 10/27/2007 1:12:47 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

UUUUUUNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!


28 posted on 10/27/2007 1:23:02 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Mother of the Bride here, treat me with respect for once, will ya? ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
UUUUUUNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!

That's exactly what I said when I saw it! lol

29 posted on 10/27/2007 1:30:55 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
This artcile in AZ, and the following thread in TX.

Maybe they are finally waking up.

Immigration crackdown expands along border (TX)

It is ironic that they can use existing laws. TX Rep Culbertson said they could have been using them all along, because Yuma and Del Rio already does.

That would indicated that Tony Snow, George Bush, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Ted Kennedy, Arlen Specter, et al., crying for Comprehensive Immigration Reform -- because we need the laws -- was nothing but the shellgame shamnesty many of us though it was.
30 posted on 10/27/2007 2:32:46 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I’ve been saying all along E.T.L.! What we need all across all of our borders, and at every air terminal is Judge Dredd. Da Law is Da Law!


31 posted on 10/27/2007 3:12:39 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung

That’s right, if you have aids, come on in.


32 posted on 10/27/2007 3:23:40 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Allen also worries how detention facilities already stretched to the limit will adequately handle a major influx of people.

Well, Ms. Allen, Sheriff Joe Arpaio already has a program in place to deal with this should it happen-- tent cities.

33 posted on 10/27/2007 5:09:24 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson