People who say stupid things like that just set themselves up to be made a fool of.
I'm sure you are aware that other candidates haven't even begun to advertise in IA and NH, while Mitt has been spending millions advertising there incessantly.
Mitt's victory in IA and NH is by no means a sure thing.
Don't mind me. Just injecting a little reality into your 'reality'.
1. Romney up over 11 in the avg. but up 14 in the most recent.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_republican_caucus-207.html
Rudy is #2 in the most recent.
NH: Romney up over 5 in the average, up 10 in the most recent. Rudy #2 in most recent.
http://www.anselm.edu/NR/rdonlyres/B9C20574-57F4-47E9-8207-42252C4FA767/11912/saintanselmcollegepoll102507data.pdf
SC: Rudy # 1 in average. Fred is #1 in most recent with Rudy #2.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_primary-233.html
FL: Rudy up 8 in avg., and even if you discount Quinnipiac (why?) which has him up 16, the previous poll had him up 10. Fred, McCain, and Mitt are essentially tied for #2.
Fihttp://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1297.xml?ReleaseID=1112
Finally, MI: Romney up 5 avg. Rudy leads by 4 in most recent, and Mitt is #2 in most recent.
http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/michigan_poll_101007.htm
Rudy leads in Nevada over Fred by 5; by 18 in CA over Mitt; by 8 in PA over Fred and Mitt; and by 30 in NJ.
We're talking delegates here and winning states. Where do you see Fred's delegates in any of these polls?