Posted on 10/25/2007 5:18:22 PM PDT by SJackson
EXCLUSIVE: SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION BY LEADING NEO-NAZI TO RON PAUL CAMPAIGN IDENTIFIED
by LST Staff | 10/25/2007 4:59 pm | Alert moderator
LONESTARTIMES.COM EXCLUSIVE!!!
Must credit LoneStarTimes.com!!!
That means YOU, mainstream media producer/reporter/outlet!
-
A LoneStarTimes.com investigation has conclusively established that a leading figure in the American neo-Nazi / White-Supremacist movement has provided financial support to Ron Pauls 2008 Presidential campaign.
The individual in question is Don Black, the founder, owner and operator of Stormfront, a white power website that both professional journalists and watch-dog groups have identified as the premier English-language racist/hate-site on the Internet.
Previous LST posts have focused on banner widgets appearing on the front-page of Stormfront. It is important to emphasize that these are NOT advertisements placed on Stormfront BY the Paul campaign, but rather publicly-available graphics that Stormfronts owner has chosen to place himself, with links directly to Pauls donation page.
Nevertheless, LST has in the past several weeks raised a series of questions for the Paul campaign; specifically
1. Can Paul confirm that the donation widgets appearing on Stormfront are the result of the site owners actions, not the campaigns?
2. Will Paul take measures to block Stormfront as a referring URL to his own website, so that no future donations can possibly flow into his campaign from a site that serves as the on-line nexus of neo-Nazism?
3. Will Paul ask his own web-staff to trace past donations that were made by anyone arriving at his campaigns webpage from Stormfront, so that these contributions can be rejected?
4. Will Paul explore if there are any legal actions available to try to remove his donation widget from Stormfront, and if so pursue them?
5. At the very least, will Paul personally state publicly, vigorously and unmistakably that he rejects the support of white supremacists, and that he will not knowingly tolerate their involvement with his campaign in any form or to any degree?
LoneStarTimes.coms managing editor Matt Bramanti left multiple messages last week for officials in Pauls national campaign press office seeking comment. None were returned.
In the interim, a number of grassroots supporters of Pauls campaign including many honorable and regular readers of LST have argued that
These abstract debates are now moot a contribution to the Paul campaign by a known white-supremacist has been identified.
The evidence is as follows:
In light of these facts, we believe our previously asked questions continue to have merit.
A final note it is traditional in political campaigns for candidates to return contributions from toxic donors once sufficient public scrutiny and outcry has been generated.
The difficulty in this instance is that if Ron Paul returns these funds to Mr. Black, all he will have done is given a neo-Nazi $500 more dollars with which to spread his psychotic bile.
We would therefore like to suggest that the Ron Paul campaign donate Blacks $500 to any of the following worthy recipients
We try to be helpful.
Matt Bramanti, Managing Editor (Gentile Stooge)
David Benzion, Publisher (Z.O.G. Chapter #1948 President)
LoneStarTimes.com
NOTE: For interview requests, contact us at lsteditors
Informed supporters of a candidate are denigrated for simply expressing their views? How come you don't see supporters of Fred! or POS Rudy text-messaging or "spamming" online polls or out there volunteering for free?
>> I spend the majority of my time on FR posting about economic issues... and agree with most FReepers. In my personal life, I never even bring up Ron Paul with friends and co-workers...
Yep, describes me to a “T”. Except I also enjoy humor threads. And ripping on Ron Paul.
But methinks thou dost protest too much!
Begs the obvious question: why are YOU here on this thread (and other RP threads)? Why are YOU wasting so much time on this thread?
No such thing as protesting too much on a Paul thread.
Of course he is a legitimate target for criticism. His foreign policy is bonk for starters. But why do you spend nearly 99% of your FR time fighting against someone with no national presence and 1% of the vote? How logical is that. What use of this is to the conservative movement? Why are you not using this time to rail against Hillary and help raise money for people like Thompson, Hunter, and Tancredo? Almost all of your posts are on Ron Paul. It's seriously at the point where you are obsessed with him.
That's a good question. I am probably wasting too much time. I guess the reason I am is because I agree with Ron Paul 100% on economic issues (and 70% on everything else) and because I really get annoyed with SJackson. Seriously all of his posts are about LRon. I digress though. You are right though. I do have better things to do with my time. All I will say is I hope Hitler is defeated--I dont even care by whom on the right at this point. FRegards,
I'll put you in touch with some of the people who whine that I spend 99% of my FR time on the middle east. A few of them Paul whiners, not you, and on some nasty non-FR sites too.
I'll worry about the topics I post on, but thanks.
A ping to 67, since I’m being whined about to you too.
I’ll address the rest of the points later. It’s been a long day for me.
No surprise here...since, I’ve watched Paul for many yrs...I’d consider him one of them.
OK, but not really necessary, without responses the thread dies, and I suspect this will resolve itself.
PING your buddies for photo-shopped pics of Paul in various takes, that'll keep the thread alive.
Geez! I didn't know he was running! They allow nutjobs to run for President?
Did RP solicit these funds? If not, what’s the connection? Please state it clearly - your post wanders. It is like most of the “blog fog” that passes for detective work on the web - a thunder of fart with hardly anything actually rattling into the pot.
I assume you mean to imply that there is some aspect of his platform that attracts NAZIs. What aspect is that?
I would suggest answers, but I think that’s your job.
Second, what, if anything, does it mean when one sliver of one man’s set of opinions corresponds with one sliver of the full range of another man’s? Are you stating that RP’s full range of opinions is in alignment with NAZIs’ full range?
Or what are you saying?
And they all oppose Rudy as far as I can tell who has a dangerously legitimate chance of fracturing the GOP beyond repair. These are not dumb people and their help in getting out the truth on Giuliani could be so valuable. It's frustrating as hell.
Michael Medved is a liberal, Rudy-loving douche. I'd be proud to have him opposing me.
Hard to imagine he did. That would be very stupid. In fact it's rather stupid for Black to contribute, he knows better.
assume you mean to imply that there is some aspect of his platform that attracts NAZIs. What aspect is that?
His campaign say's it's just the usual stuff, and that they don't know who these guys are.
He's running for President, not dogcatcher.
He has relationships with some unsavory folk.
Columnist for Willis Carto.
Column in the COCC publication.
: Radio on COCC associate Political Cesspool.
Alex Jones.
He's putting his name out there in the hate and truther communities, to suggest he's getting support by accident is disingenuous.
But you know that.
Since you insist I'm saying he's a columnist for a neonazi/klucker with a half century of fame, Willis Carto, with ties to the COC, and support in ugly place on the internet which he ignores.
And that that's stupid in the extreme. And potentially harmful to Republicans.
As to whether I think he's in full agreement with NAZIs, good grief, one of your fellow paulites was just posting that 99% of my posts, and I post a lot, are about Ron Paul.
I you can't figure that out, better yet back it up with links, you're hopeless.
Solid accusation though
The hell with that. It should be donated to charity. Why provide those scumbags with any money?
I'm sure he is.
Is he a disposable douche, one of those plastic thingies?
What flavor?
I'm glad you didn't call him a douchebag, that's really disgusting.
Michael Medved is a douche, it that a Ron Paul opinion?
I heard Medved interview him, he was pretty polite. I was disappointed he didn't bring this stuff up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.