Five disqualifying issues for political office [Giuliani is DISQUALIFIED on each and every one]

CpForLife.org ^ | 10-21-07 | CpForLife.org

[TigersEye]

Well I guess that answer covers Fundamentalist Christians. I didn’t know that they were the only ones opposed to Rudy Giuliani or that Dr. Dobson spoke for all FCs.

[TigersEye]

Not when the sacrifice ensures the very outcome you want to prevent with the possibility that doing so will avoid it.

President Rudy Toot is an outcome I want to prevent.

[TigersEye]

Exactly right. And that is why, if it came down to Rudy versus Hillary, Hillary would actually be the better choice.

That's true but I won't vote for her either.

I reckon I'm off to my shower now.

[MamaB]

Me neither.

[mbraynard]

How can you be so obtuse.

It's primary season. That is not the choice at hand.

[dbacks]

[President Rudy Toot is an outcome I want to prevent.]

So if it is a Rudy-Hillary ticket you will vote for hillary or neither thereby guarantying a hillary win?

[TigersEye]

I, like many other here, have said for months that I will not vote for Rudy under any circumstances.

[Ol' Sparky]

Given the choice between Hillary and Guiliani, please make a recommendation as to which one I might vote for.

Neither.

[Colofornian]

So if it is a Rudy-Hillary ticket you will vote for hillary or neither thereby guarantying a hillary win?

You've been listening to far too much propaganda lately. If TigersEye didn't vote for Rudy, one mere vote (I don't believe) will decide this election. (I mean, you can't be serious: TigersEye's not voting = a guaranteed Hillary win? Boy, TigersEye, you wield one powerful vote...why bother campaigning beyond the primaries when all the nominees have to do is to come and bow before you, giving you proper obeisance!)

[TigersEye]

They’d best get used it too. ;^)

[Colofornian]

If Rudy is the Republican nominee, I will probably vote for him. Make up all the lists you want that are good for you. My list is short— can the candidate defeat the democratic nominee who would fail every question on your silly test and about 110 more.

So it's not really about "110 questions"; it's really about one...and that one makes you a "single-issue" voter (anti-Hillary).

[TigersEye]

I like you. Do you want to be President?

[Syncro]

I see more than one poster posted before reading your WHOLE post.

With out your Number One point-—gun rights---the others would not be possible.

Gotta watch for those that are “smarter” than you and the samantictitions....

Good points you have brought up.

[Syncro]

...we don't know that Giuliani will be chosen as the Republican candidate. We are almost certain that Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee and with that in mind, I will make no choice that might end up seating a person whom I regard as a despot in the White House.

One despot is like another. Giuliani can't beat Hilliary.

Dr. Dobson is a fine man. He doesn't realize, however, that this country is not a theocracy.

Huh? An absurd statement which pretty much does a number on your credibility.

What he and his followers will end up doing, if not very careful, is bringing great angst and tribulation on this nation.

Nope. That will be come with or without Dr. Dobson. Look, I can see angst right here on this thread. Tribulation will come when God is tired of our folly.

"You people" (shades of Ross Perot!) need to get over the notion that you are going to field a candidate who will be elected and deny the Presidency to Hillary and Giuliani. Ain't going to happen, however principled you think the effort might be.

So what would be best, Clinton/Giuliani or Giuliani/Clinton?

You got a lot of work to do to pull that off...

[EasySt]

ick! No, I wouldn't vote for her either. If the Republican party nominates Rudy, Conservatives and Christians need not apply. It would actually be better in such a situation, to have Clinton in, with at least SOME opposition. With Rudy there would be none. Social conservatives would have zero voice in the GOP. At that point, it’s time to start looking for those hills we’re supposed to flee to...

[TigersEye]

I agree. Rudy is a very influential politician. I don’t want somebody with his effectiveness and the Republican label pushing far left policies. Look how these so-called conservatives fawn over him now. He would move Pro-Choice and anti-gun legislation through Congress without a struggle. Same thing with his liberal judicial nominees.

[Grut]

Huh-- since when? It's if you don't vote you can't copmlain

If the candidates are Larry, Curly and Moe and you vote for one of them, you're blessing a process that's already completely corrupted. It takes real chutzpa to complain about the consequences, after that.

[Kaslin]

No you are wrong. I stand by what I said. If you stay home and don't vote, then you can't complain because someone like Larry, Curly, or Moe got elected

[dforest]

I totally agree. If the best the GOP can do is put up a candidate like Rooty, they must want Hillary to win.

It is face the facts time. There will simply be many people who will not vote for Rooty. They will not be motivated to vote. It will be like A Bob Dole year.

We have argued for months on FR. Bottom line is that many will not vote if Rooty is the candidate. This fear of Hillary tactic obviously isn’t working.

I have had others tell me, that are not FReepers, that they will not vote for the liberal ex NYC mayor.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Waving hands and blown kisses to anybody who quotes the Catechism.

+{{{8^)

(Papal smiley face.)