Skip to comments.
Five disqualifying issues for political office [Giuliani is DISQUALIFIED on each and every one]
CpForLife.org ^
| 10-21-07
| CpForLife.org
Posted on 10/21/2007 1:16:26 PM PDT by cpforlife.org
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: Shimmer
It is innaccurate to say that “qualifications” can only mean “constitutional qualifications.”
Would you say a 35-year-old American-born retarded person is qualified to be President? Well, he’s qualified constitutionally to hold the office—to be elected—but I doubt anyone would consider him intellectually qualified to be president.
41
posted on
10/21/2007 3:10:32 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: Shimmer
For that matter, I doubt you would consider qualified a native-born American, older than 35, of an above-average intellectual capacity, who is also convinced he is the resurrection of the historical Napoleon—not figuratively, mind you, but literally.
Qualified to be President?
42
posted on
10/21/2007 3:13:58 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: cpforlife.org
How about Gun Control
The born have a right to defend their life
That is a basic right
Why was that left out
43
posted on
10/21/2007 3:15:02 PM PDT
by
uncbob
(m first)
To: Shimmer; fetal heart beats by 21st day; Issaquahking; All
The more I learn about Hunter the more I like him.
He seems right on every issue. And not just recently converted to the right side, but a solid life long conservative since he began in politics long ago.
44
posted on
10/21/2007 3:15:42 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: cpforlife.org
But 911 changed everything. Now Rootie thinks the 2nd Amendment has some validity. He may decide that 911 changed his mind on the other issues as well. No harm in nominating him to find out /Sarcasm.
45
posted on
10/21/2007 3:17:09 PM PDT
by
DemEater
To: Petronski
Technically, constitutionally, yes, I would. Hillary is “qualified” in that sense. Now morally....ACKK!!!!!! I view her as constitutionally qualified, but not fit to be a dogcatcher.
:D
46
posted on
10/21/2007 3:20:12 PM PDT
by
Shimmer
(You cannot stop illegal immigration tomorrow by rewarding illegal immigration today.)
To: Petronski
No, I don’t mean only constitutionally, but I thought that’s what was being addressed.
:)
47
posted on
10/21/2007 3:22:52 PM PDT
by
Shimmer
(You cannot stop illegal immigration tomorrow by rewarding illegal immigration today.)
To: uncbob
It was listed; please re-read and see post 13.
48
posted on
10/21/2007 3:23:30 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: cpforlife.org
That’s five fewer than Hillary.
49
posted on
10/21/2007 3:24:35 PM PDT
by
reg45
To: davisfh
False Choice (Logical Fallacy)
50
posted on
10/21/2007 3:26:24 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: davisfh
Well, how does Hillary stack-up on these issues? Given the choice between Hillary and Guiliani, please make a recommendation as to which one I might vote for.Hillary stacks up exactly the same. But on the issue of support on the Republican side of the aisle in Congress Rudy would have it in almost an unqualified manner. Hillary would have to fight them to get her socialist agenda made law.
So, between Hillary and Rudy the question is "do you want a socialist President who faces opposition in Congress or do you want a socialist President who has bipartisan support?
51
posted on
10/21/2007 3:27:35 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: savedbygrace
"False Choice (Logical Fallacy)" Wrong!! Logical certitude!! To do otherwise would be to flush the nation down the drain.
52
posted on
10/21/2007 3:31:10 PM PDT
by
davisfh
To: burzum
No. The Constitution is clear on what disqualifies a candidate. Trying to pretend it means something else only shows ignorance of the Constitution.The Constitution doesn't dictate the conscience of the electorate. Citizens may impose any criterion they wish to.
53
posted on
10/21/2007 3:32:10 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: burzum
If you don't like Guiliani then don't vote for him. Don't say it is because of his religious or political 'qualifications.'Who the hell put you in charge of the speech of others?
Here, I'll save you some time n00bie, NOBODY did.
54
posted on
10/21/2007 3:33:05 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(If illegal immigrants were so great for an economy; Mexico would be building a wall to keep them in)
To: dbacks
High gound moralism will ensure the presidency of a raging hateful LIB. My thanks.Actually living one's values sometimes requires sacrifice.
This isn't really one of those times though.
55
posted on
10/21/2007 3:36:41 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: burzum
If you don't like Guiliani then don't vote for him. Don't say it is because of his religious or political 'qualifications.'Those are my reasons. Why shouldn't I say it?
56
posted on
10/21/2007 3:39:02 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: cpforlife.org
FIVE such disqualifying issues are: ... I think the pro-life folks are falling down on their job of convincing enough of the population to oppose abortion. Otherwise Bush would gladly have helped promote a constitutional amendment against it. Without massive popular opinion against it though, no president can do much about it.
57
posted on
10/21/2007 3:42:30 PM PDT
by
narby
To: davisfh
No, the choice is not between Giuliani and Clinton. It’s between Giuliani and the other Republican candidates.
Your set up is a False Choice.
58
posted on
10/21/2007 3:53:56 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: narby
Damn you and your stinking logic & reason!
To: All; cpforlife.org
I wrote an editor’s letter about Rudy, and hope many, many other pro-life, conservatives will join me.
60
posted on
10/21/2007 4:06:08 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson