Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."
Agree.
Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.
‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan
I guess you missed the word POSSIBLE.
Even the "worst" GOP nominee is better than letting Hillery Clinton get back into the White House.
This is categorically untrue, but this has been explained to you ad nauseam and there is no point in trying anymore. You are obviously one of those who has long wished for the Republican Party to become liberal.
BTW, a candidate becomes the Party nominee by the majority of Party members (in significant early Primary states) voting for them. Whoever that is, thus has the backing of the majority of Republican voters in those Primaries.
Typical liberal patronizing.
If you want to ensure that isn't one particular candidate, I would suggest working hard to convince a lot of voters to back a different candidate.
What do you think is the motivation behind letting people know just how liberal Rooty Toots is?
I know you agree with the conservative position, I copied you on the post because flaglady’s comment was directed to you.
Rooty Toots has NEVER said that he planned to do ANYTHING to end abortion. He has reaffirmed his pro-abortion position at every opportunity. And even if he did change his STATED position at this point, it would be nothing more than pathetic pandering.
And if she is Prez, you can guarantee that there will be fewer abortion restrictions, and more abortion mills.
What are you talking about, the only restrictions that exist now are on partial birth abortions. And NOBODY is going to suggest overturning that ban.
Everybody - even in New York State which is hopelessly Rudy - you must vote in the primaries against him.
The democrats have their gameplan to win the election and the willing dupes will go right along with it.
Short of someone showing up soon, Rudy is going to be the nominee... and Hitlery and her crowd will covertly back a “pro-life” “conservative” as an independent. The dupes will vote for this person, split the general conservative vote and Hitlery will get in on a plurality, and they can enjoy Hitlery being the president that appoints the next (rather large) group of Supreme Court Justices, ensuring that abortion will never be illegal in their lifetimes.
But hey, they know what they are doing....
They ignore the 11th commandment, are unable to get someone they want through the primary, so they’ll ensure the expanded and continued slaughter of millions, that they claim to be fighting for. (sigh).
AGAIN, proving my point....IT’S NOT 1970. The world is different. This country is different. Are you religious? Do you believe in the Bible?
Hypocrisy as distilled and pure as the example above can't possibly occur naturally. It must be the inevitable end result of sustained, concentrated effort.
Votes.
''He's been a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly," Romney adviser Michael Murphy told the National Review in a cover story hitting newstands today titled ''Matinee Mitt."
Mitt Fakes a Pro Choice Stance
Fake Badges+Fake Website+Fake Stance=Fake Conservative
If Fred is elected president, how many fewer abortions do you estimate will occur during his first term?
And thats where the abortion issue belongs. In the states.
I trust Rudy about as much as his ex wives likely do.
Ah yes, the mythical “Eleventh Commandment” of Ronald Reagan. How soon the FRiberals forget that it was Reagan who came closer than anyone in modern history to defeating a sitting Republican president for the Republican nomination. And he did so by pointing out how liberal Ford was.
Are you proud of the fact that you have effectively unseated MurryMom as Free Republic's village idiot?
Ummmmmmm... no. No "point" of yours has been "proven" thus far, sorry. You're stamping about, gesticulating wildly and offering increasingly shrill pronouncements and opinions in place of unvarnished fact. That's not argument; simply substituting volume for genuine substance.
IT’S NOT 1970.
... and that's... ummmmmmmm... that's the entirety of your argument, essentially, as to why [IYNSHO] "abortion will never again be made illegal"...? Because "IT'S NOT 1970?" That's the sharpest, deadliest arrow in your eensy, attenuated rhetorical quiver? I mean... "IT'S NOT 1970?" That's it -- ?!?
Well... gosh all whillikers. Guess there's no point whatsoever in attempting to restore some modicum of comparative sanity to any other social/political/economic area where hundreds of thousands of good, sharp, committed conservatives have been , then. "Reduce spending...?" IT'S NOT 1970!!! "Return to a strict constructionist judiciary...?" IT'S NOT 1970!!! "Restore our universities to actual places of higher learning once more, rather than full-bore leftist indoctrination...?" IT'S NOT 1970!!!
The reason you're finding precious few takers hereabouts for your particular off-brand of "conservatism," hon, is -- plain and simple -- it's pap. (... and not even terribly convincing pap, at that.) Just FYI, is all.
The world is different. This country is different.
More sorrowfully (at least, in your own instance): so-called "conservatives" are, in certain lamentable respects, "different." The pro-life plank of the Republican national party platform has been solidly (and righteously) in place since the unconstitutional judicial fiat commonly referred to as Roe v. Wade; either you've found it personally distasteful all this time, or else your feelings towards it have changed since its inception. Which is it...?
Are you religious? Do you believe in the Bible?
I am; are you? If so, how do you reconcile a willingness to vote for someone who is staunchly and unapologetically pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and pro-illegal immigration? Kindly cite the Biblical chapter and verse supporting such an inherently evil and immoral position, please, since you brought the subject up. Provide links. Show your work. (Oh, this should be good...)
I can't wait to see this!
It'll just be more of the same waddling, apoplectic harrummphing as before. Trust me. ;)
And when Ford got the nomination, he stood behind him and supported him... a fact you dupes seem to ignore.
However, you and the other Rooty Rooters are trying to berate conservatives for being critical of Rooty's liberalism BEFORE A SINGLE VOTE HAS BEEN CAST.
I have never berated anyone for being critical of any nominee, the primary is for when the debate should happen. What I berate them for is for the statements like if the nominee winds up not being who they want it to be they will go third party or stay home.
Some of what the press has termed “value voters” this cycle so far are at least in rhetoric acting like people cutting of their noses to spite their faces. They haven’t put forth a strong candidate, or rallied around any candidate in the hunt for the republican primaries. Or if they have their rallying really hasn’t resulted in much movement in the field. So they are out there talkign like Dobson about 3rd party candidates or sitting home. This is rediculous foolishness, and I will berate anyone for that. Hitlery’s husband always went to office on plurality by doing the same crap... sponsor a “conservative” covertly and split the oposition vote and wind up with the win.
Hitlery is a devout socialist, a student of saul alinsky and believes in her heart the lines of thought that Noam Chomski et al promote. She will do everything in her power to undermine everything traditional to this nation if she gets into power, make no mistake about it. Anyone who claims to care about any traditional value that would not do anything that it takes to keep this nightmare from office is short sighted, selfish or flat out ignorant.
It will take another 20-30 years just to undo the damage her husband has done to this nation and the world in his 8 years, and he was not an ideological liberal/socialist... he was simply an opportunistic narcissistic cad. His 8 years saw the sale of state secrets to foreign enemies for campaign money, the undermining of our military, the expansion of government and the sale of 50 years of technology to foreign nations in exchange for bribes. The willing ignorance of the growing threat of wahabbist islam etc etc etc, Hitlery will be 100 times worse.
I don’t care who the nominee is, once the nominee is selected, even if its someone I don’t personally care for or disagree with on many issues I hold personally dear, you better believe that I will be supporting the Republican candidate, as long as they are not anti-war, to do otherwise is just flat out insanity. If we wind up with 2 candidates from both the major parties being anti war, then our republic is effectively over with anyway, as surrender to this enemy is not an option and I’ll have to review my options and probably relocate to new Zealand or Australia, and weep for what the world has lost.
ALL LIFE IS SACRED BTTT. We should handle it with care instead of delving into moral relativism. Agree?
Thanks for the thought, but I multitask a lot and you just happened to see the result of an ALT-TAB while the video settings were changed by another app. :-) I am so used to it, I had forgotten it was set that way when I took the screenshot...apologies to all!
BTW, for those who missed it, the name in the Address Bar was "Stalin"...in reference to pinging those about whom one is posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.