Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Who took the offending action?

The government took the offending action, by removing the option from the private property owner to invite smoking customers.

The thought of eating sushi repels me, so I avoid sushi restaurants.

For the life of me, I will never understand why anti-smokers seem unable to make a simple choice. Enter, or not.

Libertarianism argues in favor of private property rights; socialism argues "equality."

149 posted on 10/22/2007 11:27:50 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Madame Dufarge

Libertarians shout rights when it suits them. Non-smokers only have a right to stay home.


150 posted on 10/22/2007 11:33:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Old Chinese Proverb (well sorta) say dance with the one who brung ya. Yes we very much like Crinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: Madame Dufarge

< Libertarianism argues in favor of private property rights; socialism argues “equality.” >

How one cannot comprehend that is beyond this person here. Very well stated. Have a socialism-free day!


207 posted on 10/24/2007 9:21:07 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson