Posted on 10/19/2007 6:51:06 PM PDT by RedRover
Camp Pendleton, California U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey R. Chessani and Lance Corporal Stephen B. Tatum will face general courts-martial for their roles in a controversial firefight following an al Qaeda-led insurgent ambush in Haditha, Iraq almost three years ago in which 24 Iraqi citizens died.
Also on trial is whether combatants caught in a no-quarter duel can be successfully prosecuted for the life or death decisions they make in the white-hot crucible of combat.
The decision to bring the two Marines to courts-martial was made by Lieutenant General James N. Mattis, the convening authority in the case and its final arbiter. He upheld the recommendation of the investigating officer in Chessanis case to charge him with dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order. Mattis overrode the decision of the investigating officer in Tatums case to dismiss all the charges including multiple counts of unpremeditated murder - against the veteran enlisted Marine.
Instead, Mattis referred charges against Tatum for involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment and aggravated assault. He dismissed charges of murder and negligent homicide against the survivor of the horrific Hell House fight at Fallujah, Iraq in November 2004.
The generals decision brought an immediate reaction from the defense lawyers.
Referring this case to trial imperils every young Marine and soldier who faces a split second decision in combat, according to a statement from veteran Marines Jack Zimmerman and Kyle R. Sampson, the Houston, Texas attorneys who represent Tatum. Zimmerman, a former infantryman, was decorated for valor twice while serving in Vietnam.
Chessani, a career Marine infantryman, is the former commanding officer of 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines. Chessani is charged with dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order for failing to accurately report and investigate the incident.
His battalion was attacked in a coordinated al Qaeda-led complex ambush on December 19, 2005, the Marine Corps says. During the engagement one Marine was killed and 11 others were wounded. According to intelligence information gleaned from Iraqi informants and captured insurgents the insurgents plan was to attack the battalion in several locations simultaneously to cause maximum carnage among Iraqi civilians.
Chessanis attorneys at the Thomas More Law Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, said they are particularly disappointed with the decision to bring their client to trial because of the chilling effect the case has on the militarys sacrosanct chain of command.
Attorney Brian Rooney, himself a Marine combat veteran and one of the attorneys representing Chessani said second-guessing the actions of combatants is tantamount to the Soviet commissar theory of command. During the Communist era of the former Soviet Union political officers called commissars could countermand the orders of combat leaders in the name of political expediency.
You might as well have a political officer in every battalion to make sure every order is politically correct, Rooney said.
Both Marines had been in combat in Iraq in al Anbar Province during two deployments when the Haditha incident occurred. The incident began when a squad from Kilo Company, 3/1 was ambushed December 19, 2005 on a road at the outskirts of Haditha. In the ensuing day-long fight 24 Iraqi citizens were killed in the cross-fire between insurgents and counter-attacking Marines.
Three months later the attack was brought to light in a series of inaccurate and highly inflammatory reports initiated by a March 6, 2006 article in Time Magazine by reporter Tim McGirk. His report and those that followed claimed the Marines had killed the Iraqis in cold-blood in retaliation for the death of Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas. The story was picked up by Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha, who went on international television to claim the Marines had killed the Iraqis for revenge.
The furor generated by the reports and Murthas outlandish rhetoric sparked two separate investigations of the battalions actions. Last December those investigations resulted in the charging of eight Marines with murder, assault, and dereliction of duty for allegedly covering up the crimes. Subsequently four of those Marines were exonerated.
During the summer-long Article 32 investigatory hearings at Camp Pendleton the hearing officers charged with looking into the matter determined no murders had been committed.
So far Chessani and Tatum are the only 3/1 Marine ordered to courts-martial in the incident. Three other Marines, including Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich, the squad leader of the ambushed squad, still face the possibility of general court-martial.
Wuterich is waiting to discover whether he will be charged with 17 counts of unpremeditated murder and uttering a false statement. Lt. Col. Paul Ware, the investigating officer in his case, recommended that the murder charges be reduced to seven counts of negligent homicide. Mattis can accept the investigating officers recommendations, ignore them, or charge him with other offenses.
One source close to the investigation said Friday afternoon that Wuterich is expected to learn his fate sometime next week. In addition, a junior officer, Lieutenant Andrew Grayson, must still undergo ab Article 32 investigation to determine whether there is enough evidence to bring them to trial for dereliction of duty.
Despite Mattis decision to bring the two Marines to trial their lawyers remain confident they will be exonerated.
We are very disappointed that the Commanding General did not follow the recommendation to withdraw and dismiss all charges made by the experienced trial judge who heard all the evidence during the Article 32 Investigation, Tatums attorneys said. However, Lance Corporal Tatum did not commit any crime, and we will take the fight to the courtroom. We will vigorously challenge the government's case, and nothing will be left undone in defense of this fine young Marine.
We remain convinced that the military justice system eventually will reach the right result, they concluded.
Rooney offered similar sentiments.
We expect that Lieutenant Colonel Chessani will be fully exonerated when this goes to trial. While we are disappointed with the decision we look forward to going to court-martial to show that no stone was left unturned and nothing was swept under the rug in an effort to discover the truth of what happened at Haditha, Rooney said.
That’d be it!
Yes, this is a good idea. hopefully the graphic will reduce to three Marines soon.. eh?
Yes, indeed. Seems certain that SSgt Wuterich’s case will go to trial. But the Lt Grayson case is so stupid that I can’t imagine it will get past the Article 32 stage.
We are thinking alike.
Do you have a rough estimate of cost of the prosecution?
That looks fine, everyone. So I’m assuming Dela Cruz’s subtitle has changed a few times, and the decision is to keep all 8 together? Fine by me.
They actually are two separate pictures. They just don’t look it. What were you thinking? A line between them?
Hmm I did not realize him getting the 4th star would mean he handed over his roll as the convening authority.
I had assumed that was a duty given to an individual (take the IO as an example) and not a to a position.
Hmm need to rethink this then.
“...the government reportedly spent $43 million investigating and prosecuting these Marines.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1906350/posts#23
What else could that money have purchased....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In June, IMG won a contract for $8.4 million to build 16 mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles (MRAPs) to be used by the Marine Corps and other joint forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5228946.html
or any of these DOD contracts
http://www.defenselink.mil/contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=3629
One of the many reasons I am glad our Marine son has returned from Iraq is that he will not have to face this kind of BS.
Bless you Ma for pointing that out.
While I am worried that this case will go before a court martial, at least so far it has been reasonably fair, considering the amount of questionable evidence used against these Marines.
And that $43 million was just for the investigation up to the Article 32. That number will climb through the Article 32s and court martials.
Well, well, well...look what I just found. The SOBs get a court martial, and lookie here! Reuters is going for a Haditha redux. Check out the slideshow-it’s a good thing we’re near Halloween, this is hauntingly familiar:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071021/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
Lardass Murtha must have called in some markers. The whole thing stinks of set-up.
Tensions also rose in northern Iraq after separatist Kurdish rebels ambushed a military unit near Turkey's border with Iraq, killing at least 12 soldiers. Turkey's government has threatened to take action against the rebels based in northern Iraq if the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq does not stop the Kurdish attacks on Turkish forces.
Isn't nice how the AP can work in a n entirely seperate incident and make it seem like it is our fault or our troops were attacked.
I’ve heard good things about the man who’ll be the new Convening Authority, LtGen-nominee Helland. Some say he’s even more infantry-oriented than Gen Mattis (if such a thing is possible).
The html for the line is (without the extra space after each < )...
< p>< b>< font color=maroon>< center >______________________________________________________< /center>< /b>< /font color=maroon>< /p>
The html for the line is (without the extra space after each < )...
< p>< b>< font color=maroon>< center >______________________________________________________< /center>< /b>< /font color=maroon>< /p>
Looks great guys!
Looks good to me, that’ll be it then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.