To: Clintonfatigued
AQ has strongly hinted that the next wave of terrorist attacks will target schools.
A biological agent deliberately introduced???
6 posted on
10/18/2007 6:17:59 PM PDT by
lightman
(The Office of the Keys should be exercised as some ministry needs to be Exorcised.)
To: lightman
More a result of antibacterial soaps. They kill the germs that fight the MRSA
7 posted on
10/18/2007 6:19:09 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: lightman
AQ has strongly hinted that the next wave of terrorist attacks will target schools. A biological agent deliberately introduced??? I don't think so because this problem has been around for years and gradually became more prevalent. It may be going parabolic now. A deadly microorganism with an incidence parabolically growing is not something to sneeze at.
10 posted on
10/18/2007 6:34:54 PM PDT by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
To: lightman
I recall being at a blood safety conference in 1996, at which one of the speakers addressed the development of resistant strains of Staph. At that time, epidemiologists were already becoming alarmed over the increasing prevalence of these highly-resistant MRSA organisms. It was only a matter of time before they became resistant to the last few effective antibiotics. Furthermore, there was little research being conducted into new antibiotics, increasing the risk of future waves of infection.
This isn't a new problem. It's just becoming more obvious to the general population. I really don't think it corresponds to terrorism.
To: lightman
AQ has strongly hinted that the next wave of terrorist attacks will target schools. Schools have taken to posting a school resource officer in many districts. Many will easily spot strangers. Mass transportaion in cities, on the other hand is highly exposed. The London Tube was hit becasuse it was such a soft target. The same happened in Japan years ago. Me, I ride my car and tolerate the traffic with talk radio bitching about liberal causes while I stay clear of staph, TB, and anthrax.
39 posted on
10/18/2007 8:31:16 PM PDT by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
To: lightman
A biological agent deliberately introduced??? I was wondering the same thing. Then again, back when I was in high school, circa late 1970's, the school used to put treated sewage and manure on the football field and practice fields to fertilize them. I wondered then if they weren't exposing everybody who played sports to a myriad of germs and infectious diseases......
53 posted on
10/19/2007 5:02:04 AM PDT by
Thermalseeker
(Thinking of voting Democrat? Wake up and smell the Socialism!)
To: lightman
This threat has been long recognized and a long time developing. It is a result of the battle between man and germ. Germs are learning how to protect themselves against all the antibiotics that man has come up with in turn as they are exposed. Hospitals are incubation zones for these resistant germs, dangerous place to go when sick.
Hopefully, our science will invent better schemes to deal with bad germs, or germs in the wrong place in our bodies. Nanotech holds promise, smart miniature destroyers that identify, target and destroy bad germs, designer T-Cells manufactured by engineered viruses.
113 posted on
10/21/2007 10:59:14 PM PDT by
GregoryFul
(is a bear a bomb in a bull?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson