Posted on 10/17/2007 7:39:46 AM PDT by TitansAFC
---"...Rudy was for federally funding the slaughtering of innocent unborn human beings then, a decidedly anti-"Reagan/Bush" position..."---
You MUST follow this link and watch the videos of Rudy911.
Ping.
Fun videos to watch.
George HW Bush was anti-Reagan, if you go back far enough.
Or forward far enough.
Rudy will be the most effective leader in the war on terror....that is MY MAIN ISSUE.
Based on what? Please back-up that claim.
And yet I hear Bill Bennett gushing like a damn schoolgirl over Rudy this AM. Pathetic.
1. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ---Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
2. Terrorists have killed thousands, while abortion has murdered MILLIONS.
3. Support and vote for a CONSERVATIVE, and you'll get a man that will kill terrorists AND support and defend the LIFE of innocent babies, support and defend our CONSTITUTIONAL right to keep and bear arms, etc.
We don't need a LIBERAL RINO POS, like RINO-rudy, whose ONLY conservative position is fighting the WOT.
That's laughable. Rudy has never done anything to prevent a terror attack. He did nothing to prevent 9/11. And without a bit of shame he allowed others to portray him as some kind of hero just because he walked around in the aftermath of 9/11 and "looked good". He then actively went out and made MILLIONS off of 9/11 in speaking fees and from other business ventures. Ghoulish.
Rudy is the typical arrogant lawyer who thinks he's a gift to all around him. He really bugs me and I hope I don't have to hold my nose and vote for him. I don;t like him but he does have some lovely dresses he wears.
You are 110% correct. End of discussion!
His handling of Yassar and Fidel before 9/11. He has executive LEADERSHIP as opposed to executive management experience or NO executive experience at all; like a Senator. Read my tag line.
-—”His handling of Yassar and Fidel before 9/11.”-—
Ummm.....okay......this makes him the most qualified, best candidate to fight the War on Terror?
You’re a rather cheap date, aren’t you?
OK Genius. Who is your choice to fight Terrorism and the war and based on what have they done?
-—”OK Genius. Who is your choice to fight Terrorism and the war and based on what have they done?”-—
Well, if that was really “all that matters,” I suppose I’d be in McCain’s camp. He’s been pretty solid on the war, and he’s the war hero with military experience.
That is, as opposed to a draft-dodging war protester in Rudy911.
But rather than assume the Liberal would be the toughest leader in the War on Terror, why not go by record?
No Rudy!
How can the West fight the “war on terror” effectively if our leaders are aiding the destruction of our civilization?
Rudy is like the pornographic pay per view movies in hotel rooms...nobody admits to buying it, yet somebody must be, it’s a billion dollar a year industry.
Few people on FR actually admit that they will vote for him in the primary, but obviously somebody is...he’s got a 10 point lead in the polls despite everything.
I understand the frustration of my fellow pro-lifers, there is something inherently wrong with a person who can do nothing (or worse than nothing in Rudy’s case) while innocent babies get killed. Abortion is not just a religious issue. I don’t think you have to believe in Jesus, Vishnu, Moses, Buddha or Muhammed to know that it is wrong to stick a sharp object into a live human being. It’s just barbaric.
Agreed, I am against abortion. But my sole decision for choosing the next President is not based on this issue. I know Rudy was personally effected by the attack on 911 because it was HIS city...HIS people...HIS love....he saw the devastation first hand...he led the recoveries, he got the funding needed...he went to every funeral...he helped us all heal from this. I won’t forget that. He is a proven leader. You name me one other candidate with his leadership.
After all, at the the 2nd thing actually IS in the Constitution. No penumbras or emanations needed there, right Rudy. (all you po folk can line up after me to get your free gubmint 'Gun Money')
But hey why stop there with funding of constitutional rights Rooty Tooty. I want to own a newspaper so fork it over, give me a few hundred million to buy the Chicago Tribune.
(rooty is a freaking m-o-r-o-n)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.