Skip to comments.
Russia backs Iran nuclear rights
BBC ^
| Tuesday, 16 October 2007, 19:40 GMT 20:40 UK
| BBC Staff
Posted on 10/16/2007 10:44:26 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Seems “W” should have looked into Putin’s head, instead of his soul.
2
posted on
10/16/2007 10:45:46 PM PDT
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: SandRat; SunkenCiv; blam
Ominous was the thought on Kudlow and Company today....
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Iran also plays footsie with the Chechens, will Putin feel the same way if Iran gives the Chechens a “device.”
4
posted on
10/16/2007 10:48:44 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One can only hope that somehow Iranian uranium will first find its way to the Kremlin now that Moscow has chosen East over West.
5
posted on
10/16/2007 10:50:36 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Yeah, I’m sure that’ll work, and that Putin only has the interests of the peaceloving people of the world at heart. What a relief. ;’) Thanks E.
6
posted on
10/16/2007 10:56:55 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes Mr. Putin, 'peaceful' nuclear capabilities should be alright for Iran to have. No one has any problem with them building nuclear reactors to provide power to their industrial and civilian base.
We've offered that to them. Repeatedly.
They want refinement capability that's only useful to produce weapons grade material, and also want to destroy Israel. That's the problem, you dolt.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The world in a slow motion train wreck...
One can see all the signs...
Yet onward we go...
8
posted on
10/16/2007 11:11:44 PM PDT
by
DB
To: DB
...and the band plays on.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So Putin went to get a first hand look at his investment, after all it was Russia that provided the nuclear kit to Iran. .... Old Saddam was wanting the same deal.... Wonder what exactly Iran had to give up to get their nuclear toys? Saddam was using oil...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Russia seems almost as if an imputent child.
What happens when Iran has the bomb and threatens to use it on them or else?
Why does Russia always seem to side with people who could do it as much or more harn than us?
11
posted on
10/16/2007 11:20:17 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Russia is the new France.
12
posted on
10/16/2007 11:29:00 PM PDT
by
spna
(Lawton-Ft. Sill OK.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Well, that means the American left now has its marching orders. I’ve never know them to take a position in opposition to Russia.
Watch for the media and the left to start to get on board and support peaceful nuclear program for Iran.
Going to be interested in exactly how they are going to couch this....
13
posted on
10/16/2007 11:51:32 PM PDT
by
patriciaruth
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Reagan is rolling over in his grave as we speak.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Is he at all concerned about Israel’s right to defend itself against nuclear terrorism? Perhaps the American State Department should reconsider its own positions on that matter. Things could be a lot simpler if we stopped demanding that Israel consult the United Nations before making the slightest move.
15
posted on
10/17/2007 3:47:27 AM PDT
by
Old 300
To: DoughtyOne
Why does Russia always seem to side with people who could do it as much or more harn than us? Excellent question. For quite a while I've thought Pootie has a Napoleon complex. After listening to Bruce Bartlett interviewed last night about his new book where he called recent Bush/Putin meetings "bizarre" and listening to some of the details he cites to bolster his assertions, I'm now thinking that Pootie is just nuts. What I don't get is Pootie's 70% approval rating.....
16
posted on
10/17/2007 3:59:04 AM PDT
by
Thermalseeker
(Thinking of voting Democrat? Wake up and smell the Socialism!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Before this goes any farther down the road, Iran’s nukes must be taken out. It’s that simple.
17
posted on
10/17/2007 4:52:30 AM PDT
by
xzins
(If you will just agree to the murdering of your children, we can win the presidency)
To: Army Air Corps; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Red Badger
I’m wondering where North Korea fits into all this.
Ping to red badger...
18
posted on
10/17/2007 7:25:48 AM PDT
by
Froufrou
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; chan; GOP_1900AD
This appears to bode ill.
19
posted on
10/17/2007 1:04:17 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: Paul Ross; Froufrou; xzins; DoughtyOne; Thermalseeker; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; ...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson