Stretching what? I don't follow you. In any case, guilt by association is off topic to the issues at hand. Issues are important. Ron Paul is talking about my issues. Duncan Hunter is not. He's actually part of the problem with respect to civil liberties.
I would like to combine Ron Paul's stance on civil liberties with Duncan Hunter's stance on trade. But faced with a choice between totally free trade (which would be better than CAFTA/NAFTA) and what Napolitano refers to as the biggest attacks on our civil liberties since the British were sleeping in our homes, I'll take the candidate who's doing the most to protect our liberty every time.
..a trip down memory lane—what was your screen name before this one?—just curious...
While there are a few points that Paul makes that I agree with, his association with the left leaning, Move-On crowd and over the top personality far outways any positives he may have.
If you support his message on civil liberties, I can respect that.
He’s just not the man I can accept to lead our country.