Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP's 20% Problem
The Wall Street Journal/Opinion Journal ^ | 10/12/2007 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 10/12/2007 9:00:03 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

Fred Thompson gives "a very incoherent and not very concise stump speech," peaked months ago, and is the campaign's "biggest dud." Mitt Romney has "an authenticity problem"; he is "almost too mechanical about the issues." John McCain faces "enormous hurdles," and the "irony" of his quest is that he may just be repeating 2000. Mike Huckabee has "the obvious problems--being from Hope, Ark., and quite frankly having the last name Huckabee." The craven Republicans are "terrified about losing the presidency after losing Congress." All this comes from Terry McAuliffe, longtime Democratic Party mover, maven and moneyman, who's obviously hoping for a Democratic win.

Only kidding. It comes from Mr. McAuliffe's new podium partner on the Washington speech circuit, longtime Bush operative Dan Bartlett, recently departed after years as White House communications director.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 20; gop; noonan; problem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
It is good to see Peggy on top of her game with these pointed observations of the RNC establishment. I like the comparison of the recent Dan Bartlett commentary to something that Terry McAuliffe would say (you know, this also is a call for FReeper commentary to possibly refrain from saying what also comes out of Terry McAuliffe's mouth). In our exuberance to promote 'our guy', we don't need to trash other ABR's (anybody but Rudy). Apparently, the RNC establishment is trashing them enough.
1 posted on 10/12/2007 9:00:06 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I disagree.

The primaries are for taking on your own parties internal differences, airing them out, turning them inside out in short.

Too many people misuse Reagan’s ‘eleventh commandment’, as in this context.

Anyone remember Ronald Reagan going after Jerry Ford in the primaries in 76? I do.

Anyone remember RR going after Bush the Elder in 1980?

I do.

As for Peggy, love her to death, but her bitterness about not being asked to join the current administration has made her ‘snippy’ and ‘unreliable’ since the January 05 hit piece about the Inaugural.


2 posted on 10/12/2007 9:04:27 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

One thing that Mr. McAuliffe negelects to state is that the biggest majority of Republicans don’t have the ties that the Democrats have. Ever watch the “Clinton Chronicles”? Worth watching. After watching this, most would not vote for anyone from Arkansas.


3 posted on 10/12/2007 9:06:53 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Peggy turned into a scold a few years ago and hasn’t let up since. If she thinks Thompson has peaked then all I can say is she’s whistling past the graveyard...


4 posted on 10/12/2007 9:07:11 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Russ

‘Peggy turned into a scold a few years ago and hasn’t let up since.’

Yes, she has. Its unbecoming.

She makes some good points about Bartlett, and the administration. But she can’t hide her bitterness towards the President not hiring her in some capacity.

Just my opinion, based on reading her columns and books over the years.

And I’ll note, gee Peggy, you worked for Reagan...yet you still keep popping up in DC. When will you go home for a break?


5 posted on 10/12/2007 9:12:49 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Russ

‘Peggy turned into a scold a few years ago and hasn’t let up since.’

Yes, she has. Its unbecoming.

She makes some good points about Bartlett, and the administration. But she can’t hide her bitterness towards the President not hiring her in some capacity.

Just my opinion, based on reading her columns and books over the years.

And I’ll note, gee Peggy, you worked for Reagan...yet you still keep popping up in DC. When will you go home for a break?


6 posted on 10/12/2007 9:13:08 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Russ

‘Peggy turned into a scold a few years ago and hasn’t let up since.’

Yes, she has. Its unbecoming.

She makes some good points about Bartlett, and the administration. But she can’t hide her bitterness towards the President not hiring her in some capacity.

Just my opinion, based on reading her columns and books over the years.

And I’ll note, gee Peggy, you worked for Reagan...yet you still keep popping up in DC. When will you go home for a break?


7 posted on 10/12/2007 9:13:14 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
I say that the GOP in general, and conservatives in particular, need a quick resolution to all of this by way of a clear winner early on in the process.

Look, here it is:

Either Rudy, Fred, or possibly Mitt is going to be the nominee.
Rudy.
Fred.

Then, either the GOP will have turned into the type of Republican Party that Rudy personifies and represents, or it may return to the conservative values that empowered them to the great success of the recent past.

The modern GOP has fractured into elitist Ivory tower snobs like McCain and Trent Lott, all of the K Street, open border, Globalist, show me the money crowd, and those of us remaining of true conservative values, both fiscal and family.

This then will be a battle over the future face of the GOP, and I firmly believe that Rudy will lose to Hillary.

The electoral numbers are there.

Fred has a chance, but Hillary is still the one with the electoral advantages and it is up to Fred - and us - to overcome them, and prevail.

Will the future face of the GOP be this?

Or this?

You choose.

8 posted on 10/12/2007 9:18:52 AM PDT by bill1952 (The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Amen Badeye. Like Newt, Noonan spends all her time aiming and firing at the GOP, never at the democrats. To her readers, it dissuades some from voting for the GOP and pushes some to the democratic camp. I quit listening to this windbag a while ago and I suspect good ole Ronnie would be very disappointed in her.
9 posted on 10/12/2007 9:22:46 AM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

We don’t need to have a clear winner early. We need to start the Republican National Convention without knowing who the nominee will be. That will cause the convention to be more suspenseful and exciting, causing more people to watch and hear the great republican ideas. All of the republican conventions, since 1980, have been boring, since we knew who the nominee would be before the convention. However, after the convention, all of the anti-liberal voters, including Constitution and Libertarian Party members, should unite and work together to defeat the Democrat.

We should help the Democrats to be divided, before and during their convention. That might cause more of them to vote for the Green Party nominee.


10 posted on 10/12/2007 9:30:57 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

‘....and I suspect good ole Ronnie would be very disappointed in her.’

Same here.


11 posted on 10/12/2007 9:33:18 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins
We should help the Democrats to be divided, before and during their convention. That might cause more of them to vote for the Green Party nominee.

That won't happen. They want to win too badly. They're like we were in 2000, Broken Glass Democrats. It's why all the talk about "I could never vote for Guiliani/McCain/Romney etc." is so scary. The Democrats will by absolutely, 100% united behind their nominee, whoever it is. If we don't act the same way we're toast.

12 posted on 10/12/2007 9:40:41 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("The only thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
"The GOP's 20% Problem"

A mere pittance compared to the GOP's 70% Iraq problem.

13 posted on 10/12/2007 9:42:13 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I liked the piece. Heard Laura Ingraham tear Bartlett a new one yesterday.

Rudy is the Bush on steroids candidate. I don’t want anymore of that.

Notice how all pundits who don’t praise Rooty or Bush get badmouthed?


14 posted on 10/12/2007 9:43:05 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I liked the piece. Heard Laura Ingraham tear Bartlett a new one yesterday.

Rudy is the Bush on steroids candidate. I don’t want anymore of that.

Notice how all pundits who don’t praise Rooty or Bush get badmouthed?


15 posted on 10/12/2007 9:43:29 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

keep getting that Temp Unavailable message

sorry about the double post.


16 posted on 10/12/2007 9:45:04 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

It’s a shame that we lost the great Ronaldus Maximus. His counsel is sorely needed now.


17 posted on 10/12/2007 9:50:10 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

It’s a valid criticism of the “Republican establishment.”

And those who read past the first paragraph will find that Peggy isn’t saying those things about the Republican candidates: Terry McAuliffe is, and his buddies from the Republican establishment.

Yes, it’s true that Peggy soured on Bush, often for the wrong reasons. But at this point what she says only makes too much sense. The Republican establishment is deaf to the base. They are more concerned about their future lobbying jobs and about getting along with hillary when, as they presume, she wins the next election, than they are with getting back in touch with the Republican base, reinvigorating the party, and winning the election.

About those things, she is absolutely right.


18 posted on 10/12/2007 9:52:23 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Sadly I see little difference between the same old two parties. It like they’ve become two divisions of the same giant corporation.

Most party conservatives of today, would have been labeled liberals and leftist just a few decades ago.


19 posted on 10/12/2007 9:56:13 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

That next shot you hear will be the RNC shooting itself in the foot. Hillary has to love it.


20 posted on 10/12/2007 9:56:13 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson