Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross
I say that the GOP in general, and conservatives in particular, need a quick resolution to all of this by way of a clear winner early on in the process.

Look, here it is:

Either Rudy, Fred, or possibly Mitt is going to be the nominee.
Rudy.
Fred.

Then, either the GOP will have turned into the type of Republican Party that Rudy personifies and represents, or it may return to the conservative values that empowered them to the great success of the recent past.

The modern GOP has fractured into elitist Ivory tower snobs like McCain and Trent Lott, all of the K Street, open border, Globalist, show me the money crowd, and those of us remaining of true conservative values, both fiscal and family.

This then will be a battle over the future face of the GOP, and I firmly believe that Rudy will lose to Hillary.

The electoral numbers are there.

Fred has a chance, but Hillary is still the one with the electoral advantages and it is up to Fred - and us - to overcome them, and prevail.

Will the future face of the GOP be this?

Or this?

You choose.

8 posted on 10/12/2007 9:18:52 AM PDT by bill1952 (The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952

We don’t need to have a clear winner early. We need to start the Republican National Convention without knowing who the nominee will be. That will cause the convention to be more suspenseful and exciting, causing more people to watch and hear the great republican ideas. All of the republican conventions, since 1980, have been boring, since we knew who the nominee would be before the convention. However, after the convention, all of the anti-liberal voters, including Constitution and Libertarian Party members, should unite and work together to defeat the Democrat.

We should help the Democrats to be divided, before and during their convention. That might cause more of them to vote for the Green Party nominee.


10 posted on 10/12/2007 9:30:57 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

It’s a shame that we lost the great Ronaldus Maximus. His counsel is sorely needed now.


17 posted on 10/12/2007 9:50:10 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

Reagan or Rudy. No Brainer. Than one realizes that Reagan is gone. God Bless him. But... if we consider the fact that McCain wants Greenspand dead or alive in his administration, why than can we not have Reagan or at least his effigy? We know that his effigy would be a better leader than the choices we have now.

Great pic of Reagan.


21 posted on 10/12/2007 10:01:27 AM PDT by rineaux (Just say NO to taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
I'm sorry after seeing Fred's performance the other night and hearing him speak a couple of times he is no RR. People can project all they want, but if Fred is our nominee we go down in flames. He comes across as old, sick and a little confused when he speaks. I wish it wasn't true because I like Fred and was waiting for him to enter the race hoping he would bring something to the table, but he didn't. I think I know why he waited so long. He wasn't committed to the endeavor because he knows he is not up to it.
22 posted on 10/12/2007 10:07:10 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson