Skip to comments.
Reaper UAV now flying in Afghanistan
Air Force Link ^
Posted on 10/11/2007 5:52:23 PM PDT by SandRat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
10/11/2007 5:52:30 PM PDT
by
SandRat
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!
All the News the MSM refuses to use!
Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!
Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
2
posted on
10/11/2007 5:53:14 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
“Don’t fear the Reaper,” unless you are one of the bad guys.
3
posted on
10/11/2007 5:56:34 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: SandRat
This thread needs more cowbell.
4
posted on
10/11/2007 6:03:45 PM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
To: SandRat
Looks pretty grim to me...
These unmanned vehicles are doing some great work over there.
5
posted on
10/11/2007 6:05:08 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
To: SandRat
It’s amazing. I have seen the videos. Our guys just watch, and then they hit.
Of course we have guys who trod through the sand and the dirt. What they do is even more amazing.
Our entire military just leaves me in awe.
6
posted on
10/11/2007 6:12:39 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: NonValueAdded
Re “Don’t fear the Reaper”.
I think this is a cousin of mine.
Madmax, the Grinning Reaper
To: SandRat
Will one day, these UAL’s be able to fly higher than manned fighter jets, and be able to take out enemies fighters without the need to dogfight ? or high enough that the enemy can’t take it out. ?
8
posted on
10/11/2007 6:28:02 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
9
posted on
10/11/2007 6:29:14 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
Who knows,... think Jules Verne, science fiction to science fact.
10
posted on
10/11/2007 6:31:23 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
Just as a matter of discussion, does anybody here worry that pushbutton warfare will become too "easy"? I personally love this advanced equipment, but in the future it may be so easy to launch a bloodless war, we, or other countries with similar equipment will kill thousands just because they can.
I watched a TV show once about non lethal riot control and they eventually decided that the more non lethal methods they had, the more inclined they were to use it and the less inclined the masses were to protest. So "free speech" was almost non existent after they were able to "zap" the protesters.
In the same vein, we may strike foreign targets that are just for economic or other purposes other than self defense. Kinda like Clinton striking aspirin factories to change the subject on the front page.
11
posted on
10/11/2007 6:31:34 PM PDT
by
chuckles
To: SandRat
>it is designed to attack time-sensitive targets with persistence and precision, and destroy or disable those targets.
But will we be allowed to use it without waiting for a cloud of lawyers to rubber stamp approval?
12
posted on
10/11/2007 6:45:16 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
To: SandRat
What's the highest a manned fighter plane flew ? other than being a X-plane or space craft ?
If they can build them that can fly for weeks at a time, cheap, and with lasers to take out enemy fighter planes, why not ? better than stealth, if they can see them and the enemy can't take them out without using IBCMs or other missiles, then again, you got the patriot missiles to do that task.
To: Disambiguator
14
posted on
10/11/2007 6:58:41 PM PDT
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: chuckles
These kind of vehicles certainly take the fight to an enemy that moves fast, in rugged terrain. Hardly fun duty I’d imagine running up one hill, then another, to find folks. Just to be shot at in ambush. These things probably have infrared, and take the fun out of the booby trap.
To: chuckles
What?...if we had to use these against enemy combatants, do you think we’re gonna worry about their ‘free speech’... Free speech applies to our Constitution, where does it say we have to protect our enemy’s free speech?..
As for use against economic targets ?...darn right..remember Ploesti in WW II—knocked out Germany’s oil supply; ditto their ball bearing factories..’Course to a RAT like Clinton, knocking out an aspirin factory would make sense because the enemy would be deprived of a cheap headache remedy... but they would still have their free speech.
Just for the sake of discourse...you asked,you got a reply...cheers
16
posted on
10/11/2007 7:06:31 PM PDT
by
billmor
(“War is simple, direct, and ruthless.” General George S Patton)
To: Prophet in the wilderness

Experimental Air Force Killer Robot Sheep.
These killer sheep are planned to be parachuted into remote Islamic redoubts. The idea is that the robot sheep will present themselves in an attractive and suggestive way to the Islamist. When the Islamist attempt to ‘capture’ the little vixens, they blow up, thereby killing the terrorists.
The Killer Robot Sheep have long loiter times, are cheap and deadly.
The development program was tested on Marines whom found the little ruminates, “Sexy, yet non threatening”.
Further Robot Sheep are being designed for terrorists capture, or ‘snatch’ operations.
17
posted on
10/11/2007 7:08:07 PM PDT
by
Leisler
(Sugar, the gateway to diabetes, misery and death. Stop Sugar Deaths NOW!)
To: Disambiguator
18
posted on
10/11/2007 7:23:38 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: Aeronaut
19
posted on
10/11/2007 7:25:00 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
To: SandRat
Shoulda called it Azrael...
20
posted on
10/11/2007 7:27:09 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Lib-uh-rulz can't foresee even the clearest consequences to their actions...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson