Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious 'snow' disrupts Israeli TV
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 11/10/2007 | Daily Telegraph

Posted on 10/10/2007 8:39:56 PM PDT by PotatoHeadMick

Israel is awash with speculation over the mysterious disappearance of satellite television signals, with everyone from the Russians to the United Nations accused of jamming the population's nightly entertainment. The television network is said to be "near collapse" after a month of electronic snowstorms and interference, rumoured to be variously caused by the radar of UN patrols, Russian spy ships or even Israel's military. The interference began on Sept 6, the day Israeli warplanes slipped past Syria's Russian-made air defence systems, and attacked a military target deep inside the country.

The Israeli government has maintained an almost total silence over the strike, which some foreign media reported as an attack on a possible nuclear installation.

Since then, desperate viewers of Desperate Housewives, frustrated followers of The Bold and the Beautiful, and other TV lovers have been bombarding the switchboard of the Israeli satellite broadcaster Yes, and have launched a 122 million shekel (£15 million) class action suit against the company for failing to deliver the goods.

In a nation surrounded by hostile neighbours and often fearful of attack, a number of theories have already been floated.

A senior Israeli defence official said that Israel believed that the source was a Dutch vessel serving with Unifil, a UN peacekeeping force deployed after the Hizbollah war in Lebanon last year.

A security official meanwhile told the Yediot Ahronot newspaper that Moscow was suspected of beaming signals to try to probe Israel's military electronic capability and as an expression of its anger at Israel for making Syria's Russian radar appear impotent.

The Russian defence ministry refused to comment.

The interruptions have led to cancelled subscriptions and forced Yes to seek to pacify its 500,000 subscribers with free films.

While the Netherlands had not accepted responsibility for the interference, Mark Regev, an Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, said technical experts were in contact with Unifil.

But in another Yediot Ahronot story, the paper's diplomatic correspondent quoted an unnamed government official as saying that the answer to the riddle could lie in Israel itself, with the emissions coming from military radar.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: electronicwarfare; israel; jamming; signaljamming; syrianraid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Interesting dateline, the disruption started on Sept 6th, the day of the "incident" in Syria.
1 posted on 10/10/2007 8:40:00 PM PDT by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

A little Electronic Warfare in practice here.


2 posted on 10/10/2007 8:45:52 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

Yup. Interesting that it’s still happening though.

Obviously a live test for the real raid on Iran.

Wonder if TV signals in Tehran are being affected too...


3 posted on 10/10/2007 8:48:05 PM PDT by Philistone (If someone tells you it's for the children, he believes that YOU are a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick
Since then, desperate viewers of Desperate Housewives, frustrated followers of The Bold and the Beautiful, and other TV lovers have been bombarding the switchboard of the Israeli satellite broadcaster Yes, and have launched a 122 million shekel (£15 million) class action suit against the company for failing to deliver the goods.

They should consider themselves saved. If the broadcaster needs me to testify, I'm avaiable for a fee.

4 posted on 10/10/2007 8:52:35 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

I wonder what satellite they use and who else uses the satellite.


5 posted on 10/10/2007 8:53:21 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Dog; jeffers; familyop; shield
Mini-EMP?

Same phenomenom reported in Lebanon.

6 posted on 10/10/2007 8:56:57 PM PDT by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick
It is nothing really.

Just our UFO’s magnadrive needs a phase one diagnostic.

Carry on.

7 posted on 10/10/2007 8:59:50 PM PDT by Doctor DNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Here is my thought.

Each comm satellites services multiple clients (some telecommunications satellites have as many 40 tranceivers to handle scores of customers). What satellite is this network using? Who else uses it? Answers to these questions may help provide some clues.


8 posted on 10/10/2007 9:00:59 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick
Israel is awash with speculation over the mysterious disappearance of satellite television signals, with everyone from the Russians to the United Nations accused of jamming the population's nightly entertainment.

Ah bet the UN is jamming their entertainment.

What a wonderfully entertaining article.

9 posted on 10/10/2007 9:01:34 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Strange...


10 posted on 10/10/2007 9:01:43 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; shield
I was thinking the damage was on the ground... but some are thinking that bird Israel launched (June?) is compromised?

That would put us back on red alert, damn.

11 posted on 10/10/2007 9:06:27 PM PDT by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

The EA6B has been around for as long as I can remember. The Israelis are top-flight when it comes to electronics. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they were testing their new systems and mayhap experiencing a bit of accidental spillover effects.


12 posted on 10/10/2007 9:08:25 PM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

Hopefully this event is causing the Israeli public to read more books. Or they may have a baby boom.


13 posted on 10/10/2007 9:08:56 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake

The DBS provider, Yes, uses two Israeli sats - Amos 1 and Amos 2. Here is some info on the sats:

AMOS 1 was the first Israeli communications satellite. Its development was based on experience from Ofeq reconnaissance satellites in association with DASA and Alcatel Espace. It was launched on May 16, 1996 from European Space Center in French Guiana.
It is in use for home TV services (DTH/DBS by the Yes company in Israel and by HBO and others in Europe. Space Communications LTD quickly succeeded in filling all transmission capacity of Amos 1 and accumulated additional requests. Therefore Space Communications LTD decided to broaden its activity and initiated Amos 2 creation, which is today in its full ownership.

AMOS 2 was launched on December 28, 2003 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and it serves clients in three service regions: Middle East (including Israel), Europe and the east coast of USA. Transmission and communication services provided by this satellite include: direct distribution of TV and radio translations; TV and radio translations to communication centers; distribution of internet services, data tranmissions to communication networks.

Amos 1 and Amos 2 are placed in proximity to a create common location, which enables satellite users to increase user abilities without additional antennas.


14 posted on 10/10/2007 9:12:26 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ronin; Billthedrill; Thinkin' Gal
It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they were testing their new systems and mayhap experiencing a bit of accidental spillover effects.

You’re probably right. Still, I’d rather think of it as “We shut down your air defenses, while you jerk around with Desperate Housewives.”

15 posted on 10/10/2007 9:16:24 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: txflake
More on the sats. AMOS-1 carries nine Ku-band transponders.

Here is the ME beam coverage for Amos 1.



AMOS-2 carries Eleven Ku-band transponders.

The ME beam coverage for Amos 2

16 posted on 10/10/2007 9:20:01 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Dog; jeffers

BTTT


17 posted on 10/10/2007 9:24:40 PM PDT by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

bump for publicity


18 posted on 10/10/2007 9:27:49 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
"I wonder what satellite they use and who else uses the satellite."

There are a bunch of them. Too many. TV is typically X-Band and crowded. Blinding one with ECM is easy at ground level. Satellite Xmissins are -95 dBm at ground level. Cutting them off with a transmission of +60 dBm ECM on the ground or air for a long distance is easy. Something's boiling up over there.

19 posted on 10/10/2007 9:28:45 PM PDT by BobS (I><P>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

They are into Ku band now? Didn’t know that. There are Ka and R ones that aren’t commercial. Not crowded yet.


20 posted on 10/10/2007 9:37:50 PM PDT by BobS (I><P>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson