Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"What part of illegal does Stephan Breyer's brother Charles not understand?"
1 posted on 10/10/2007 8:24:10 PM PDT by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RAY

“If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny.” - Patrick Henry


2 posted on 10/10/2007 8:27:08 PM PDT by kc8ukw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
“There is a strong likelihood that employers may simply fire employees who are unable to resolve the discrepancy within 90 days,” even if they are legal, he (Breyer) wrote.

This statement reeks of so much BS I'm going to have to go change clothes now.
4 posted on 10/10/2007 8:32:40 PM PDT by jonathanmo (No tag available at this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
"Judge Breyer is the brother of Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court and was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1997."

Beautiful, the Stainmaster gave us a 2-for-1 on liberal bozos to the judiciary, judges who do not know the meaning of respect for the LAW or the LEGISLATURE or the EXECUTIVE branch, a pair of judges who believe in making it up as they go from the bench so long as liberal interests are satisfied.
7 posted on 10/10/2007 8:56:47 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat, defeat while we suck on liberal teat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

p.s. Is there any LEGAL person with a Social Security number who cannot obtain a Soc. Sec. card or other documentation with the number on it? Is there some form of validation that is beyond the capacity of LEGAL residents to supply within 90 days???????


8 posted on 10/10/2007 8:58:27 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat, defeat while we suck on liberal teat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

Mr. Bush has tried as hard and authentically to enforce the border as Mr. Clinton tried during his first two weeks in office to cut taxes.

Mssrs. Bush, Breyer et al, I appeal this treachery to God.


9 posted on 10/10/2007 9:16:06 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

It’s just what Bush ordered. You know he never intended to have any employers arrested nor any illegals deported.


13 posted on 10/10/2007 9:44:44 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (It*s time for "Tea Party II" This time we*ll meet at the border and toss Mexicans back over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
And that, dear George, is why we didn't trust "comprehensive immigration reform." Sure, you thought all the RAT giveaways were balanced by the strict enforcement provisions (such as they were), but we knew darned well that the Judiciary would "line-item veto" them, exactly like this judge did. Then all we'd be stuck with is an amnesty bill. Stay the %(*%^ away from Kennedy and Schumer, Mr. President, you are getting rolled.
15 posted on 10/10/2007 9:56:48 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

Yeah you’re right - legal citizenship is unconstitutional (It’s just spelled out in the constitution...)


16 posted on 10/10/2007 10:27:20 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

bump for index


24 posted on 10/11/2007 1:12:17 AM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
If allowed to take effect, the judge found, the rule could lead to the firing of many thousands of legally authorized workers, resulting in “irreparable harm to innocent workers and employers.”

BULL !!!....

25 posted on 10/11/2007 1:33:16 AM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY; politicallyincarrect; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
If allowed to take effect, the judge found, the rule could lead to the firing of many thousands of legally authorized workers, resulting in “irreparable harm to innocent workers and employers.”

BULL !!!....

O.K. FOLKS... time to fire up those phones and fax machines.. LET'S ROLL !! ---

26 posted on 10/11/2007 1:37:22 AM PDT by davidosborne (http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

If the federal government is this broken that the SS Dept cannot resolve these questions in less than 90 days, then we citizens and voters need to storm Congress and demand it be fixed.

From the beginning, the SS number was not to be used is an ID number. That used to be in the law, but I’m not sure it is any more.

Also, one of the big deals that libs and Dims raised about the reasons 9/11 wasn’t stopped before it happened is the non-communication between fed agencies. Apparently, we have the same situation here, judicially ordered.

So, either the SS number is allowed to be used as an ID number or it isn’t. If it is, then the SS Dept MUST share their info with other agencies. If it isn’t, then we’re in trouble big time WRT terrorism right here in River City.

(But if the SS number is allowed to be used as an ID number, then we’re in trouble big time WRT identity theft, and the ruined lives that leaves in its wake. Big Brother has screwed the pooch either way.)


32 posted on 10/11/2007 3:47:36 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

Surprise, surprise, surprise. Charles R. Breyer was nominated by S(l)ick Willie.


34 posted on 10/11/2007 5:28:11 AM PDT by steveegg (I am John Doe, and a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

Chertoff’s got to get his gut in gear to figure out how to counter the Judge.

That’s gonna create some abdominal cramping, for sure.


35 posted on 10/11/2007 5:37:50 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

the il part. :0)


36 posted on 10/11/2007 5:46:24 AM PDT by seemoAR (Absolute power corrupts absolutely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

39 posted on 10/11/2007 6:16:30 AM PDT by Gritty (Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.The corrupt and vicious need masters-Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
Democrat-ically obnoxious posters, who've managed to remain blissfully ignorant of how our government and courts system works have been screaming FOR NEARLY SEVEN STRAIGHT YEARS that it's all Bush's fault. They refuse to even CONSIDER the rolls courts and municipalities play in doing to any effort to curb illegal immigration what a 1 1/4 inch ratchet can do if dropped into a running turbine.

In fact, the Jorge Brigade should be on this thread, treating us to more of their talent for intelligent discourse on the subject.

40 posted on 10/11/2007 6:45:27 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY
U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"


Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]

1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.

QUISLING: a synonym for traitor, someone who collaborates with the invaders of his country.

Current federal law 8USC 1373(a) PROHIBITS SANCTUARY CITIES. It reads as follows:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of federal, state, or local law, a federal, state, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual."

48 posted on 10/11/2007 10:17:42 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RAY

I was pinged here. You want us to call the House & the Senate???


54 posted on 10/13/2007 6:28:25 PM PDT by floriduh voter (Terri Ping List: 8mmmauser & I'm 4 DUNCAN HUNTER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson