Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian couple seeks R.I. divorce
AP via Yahoo ^

Posted on 10/09/2007 10:13:01 AM PDT by j_hig

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A lesbian couple married in Massachusetts should have the same right as heterosexual couples to divorce in their home state of Rhode Island, lawyers for the women told the state's highest court Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cassandra Ormiston and Margaret Chambers were married in 2004 after same-sex marriage became legal in Massachusetts. Last year, the couple filed for divorce in Rhode Island.

Rhode Island law is silent on the legality of same-sex marriages.

If the women can't divorce in Rhode Island, their lawyers said the only legal avenue available to them would be for at least one to move to Massachusetts and live there long enough to obtain a divorce.

"It is an absolutely unfair burden," Ormiston said outside Rhode Island's Supreme Court. "It is a burden no one else is asked to bear, and it is something I will not do."

Lawyers for the women told the Supreme Court the only question to consider was whether Rhode Island could recognize a valid same-sex marriage from another state for the sole purpose of granting a divorce petition.

They stressed the case has no bearing on whether gay couples could get married in Rhode Island.

"You have a valid marriage in the state of Massachusetts," Louis Pulner, an attorney for Chambers, told the justices. "No one is asking the court to address the question of whether such marriages would be valid in Rhode Island."

In September 2006, a Massachusetts judge decided same-sex couples from Rhode Island could marry in Massachusetts because nothing in Rhode Island law specifically banned gay marriage. But the courts and the legislature in Rhode Island have not taken any action to recognize same-sex marriages performed in Massachusetts.

Attorney General Patrick Lynch earlier this year issued a nonbinding advisory opinion saying the state would recognize same-sex marriages performed in Massachusetts.

The justices did not indicate when they would rule.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lesbian; samesexdivorce; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Disambiguator

Mid-Atlantic and the XTerra is more or less the exclusive domain of the L crowd.


61 posted on 10/09/2007 11:52:29 AM PDT by relictele (...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: relictele; ArrogantBustard

It must be an east-coast thing with the XTerras, because out west it’s all about Subarus.

My SIL has an XTerra, and she is married (to a man). Likewise a hetero ex-coworker of mine. His is that bright yellow.


62 posted on 10/09/2007 12:04:59 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator; relictele
It must be an east-coast thing

Seems like every Aztek I see in Virginia, Maryland, WestVa, area has that stupid "equals-sign" sticker on it ...

63 posted on 10/09/2007 12:08:45 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

What’s this about XTerra’s?
GQuagmire is not amused.
I’m actually getting rid of it next year.Burns way too much gas for the miles I drive.


64 posted on 10/09/2007 12:12:27 PM PDT by GQuagmire (Giggety,Giggety,Giggety)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: j_hig

“unfair burden”

Yeah, I bet at least one of them is a real burden.

Are there no pictures of the formerly-happy quadrupeds?


65 posted on 10/09/2007 12:15:00 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I agree.

"You have a valid marriage in the state of Massachusetts," Louis Pulner, an attorney for Chambers, told the justices. "No one is asking the court to address the question of whether such marriages would be valid in Rhode Island."

Yes, the justices DO have to address the validity of the marriage under Rhode Island law. A divorce can only be issued to dissolve a valid marriage. If they issue (or cause a lower court to issue) a divorce, the justices recognize that the marriage was legal under Rhode Island law. And if a same-sex marriage (wherever contracted) is legal enough to be dissolved in Rhode Island, couldn't it also be entered into in Rhode Island as well?

66 posted on 10/09/2007 12:16:37 PM PDT by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bertha Fanation

If they can get the state to recognize the divorce then recognition of the marriage is certainly implied.


67 posted on 10/09/2007 12:17:14 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Yep.


68 posted on 10/09/2007 12:18:56 PM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: j_hig

Would complaining to the RI Bar about the lawyers involved do anything I wonder?


69 posted on 10/09/2007 12:19:09 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j_hig

this is full faith and credit in action. No amount of “federalism” will stop this.

In order for a divorce to happen the marriage must be recognized.

There is ample precident for this with common law marriages being recognized in the divorce courts of other states. Given the left wing nature of RI, it looks like this could open the flood gates.


70 posted on 10/09/2007 12:21:14 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

You tell me. I never noticed any trends with XTerras regarding LGBTs, it’s mostly Subarus.


71 posted on 10/09/2007 12:23:31 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: j_hig
It’s so simple. If Rhode Island does not recognize their marriage then they are not married. Just decide who gets to keep their kitty cat and split.
72 posted on 10/09/2007 12:25:41 PM PDT by CHEE (OK, so what's the speed of dark? - Larry the Cable Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j_hig

ROFL!

Gee, we forgot about that....

...since you’ve demanded we recognize homosexual “marriage”...

...do we also recognize “divorce”?

Better bring it up to the next legislative session!


73 posted on 10/09/2007 12:26:51 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

This is the first I’ve heard of this.At least it’s not #1 with the H-mo’s or the lesbos.


74 posted on 10/09/2007 12:27:47 PM PDT by GQuagmire (Giggety,Giggety,Giggety)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: j_hig

The problem with all these types of State licenses is that the Constitution has a ‘full faith and credit’ clause that theoretically makes a marriage in one state legal in another.

I don’t know how this will turn out but there is a Constitutional issue here.


75 posted on 10/09/2007 12:30:13 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; dfwgator
Q: Why did the gator cross the road?

A: Because it's easier than crossing the goal line.

Q: What is the difference between Cheerios and the Gators?

A: Cheerios belong in a bowl!

War Eagle! Geaux Tigers!

76 posted on 10/09/2007 12:31:35 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (I will not try to BS xsmommy. I will not try to BS xsmommy. I will not try to BS xsmommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: j_hig
Thats the whole idea; to shop this this to places where it it not legal and then claim legality.

Then if this is true, then why are all state not conceal carry?

77 posted on 10/09/2007 12:35:45 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Lesbomobiles.

I have to admit that cracked me up. In New England, that most often describes a Subaru Forrester with any one of the following bumper stickers:

Eve Was Framed
Uppity Women Unite
Goddess Bless
Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History
You Say I'm a Bitch Like it's a Bad Thing.

78 posted on 10/09/2007 12:43:49 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I just have to keep reminding myself, that when you are the defending champs in football and basketball, these shots just come with the territory when you lose the rare game.


79 posted on 10/09/2007 12:57:12 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U (At least we didn't lose to Stanford))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson