Posted on 10/08/2007 11:20:57 AM PDT by rubeng
The man who stands between US and new war
Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, has taken charge of the forces in the American government opposed to a US military attack on Iran, writes Tim Shipman.
Pentagon and State Department officials say Mr Gates has set himself up as chief rival to Dick Cheney in a bid to thwart the vice?president's desire to bomb the Islamic state.
Those familiar with internal battles in the Bush administration say Mr Gates has eclipsed Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, as the chief opponent of air strikes and is the main reason President George W.Bush has yet to resort to military action.
Pentagon sources say Mr Gates is waging a subtle campaign to undermine the Cheney camp by encouraging the army's senior officers to speak frankly about the overstretch of forces, and the difficulty of fighting another war.
Bruce Reidel, a former CIA Middle East officer, said: "Cheney's people know they can beat Condi. They have been doing it for six years. Bob Gates is a different kettle of fish. He doesn't owe the President anything. He is urging his officers to be completely honest, knowing what that means."
Officials say Mr Gates's strategy bore fruit when Admiral William Fallon, the head of US Central Command, charged with devising war plans for Iran, said last month that the "constant drumbeat of war" was not helpful.
He was followed by General George Casey, the army's new chief of staff, who requested an audience with the House of Representatives armed services committee to warn that his branch of the military had been stretched so thin by the Iraq war that it was not prepared for yet another conflict.
Gen Casey told Congress the army was "out of balance" and added: "The demand for our forces exceeds the sustainable supply. We are consumed with meeting the demands of the current fight, and are unable to provide ready forces as rapidly as necessary for other potential contingencies."
Mr Gates has forged an alliance with Mike McConnell, the national director of intelligence, and Michael Hayden, the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, to ensure that Mr Cheney's office is not the dominant conduit of information and planning on Iran to Mr Bush.
Insiders say Mr Gates has ensured that Mr Bush has seen more extensive studies of the probable negative effects of an attack on Iran than he was privy to before the war in Iraq.
One CIA insider said: "Bush understands that any increase in real military hostilities in Iran right now could have a negative effect. Bob Gates is the only one opposed to it. He's the single person in the US government who has any standing with the White House fighting it."
bttt
Gates is in battle with Cheney over war policy? Who's Bush, chopped liver?
Gates is in battle with Cheney over war policy? Who's Bush, chopped liver?
I’ve said for quite some time that we will not attack Iran, that we’ll have to deal with a nuclear-armed Iran in the foreseeable future. We do not have the will to take on Iran at this time.
I’m not sure that I’m accepting this report at face value.
May I suggest you put your flame suit on.
Bingo.
Well what do you know, all along I thought George Bush was the Commander in Chief.
And no doubt a Carter-ite.
Can’t we just hire the Russians to do it?
More importantly, we don’t have the troops.
Bruce Reidel is an advisor to Bill Richardson’s Presidential campaign from what I can tell.
I seriously doubt anyone at the Whitehouse takes his calls, to be polite about it, and as such I doubt he has any idea whats going on inside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, let alone between Cheney and Gates.
Google is a wonderful thing, when used effectively.
“May I suggest you put your flame suit on.”
Flame away. I’m a Vietnam vet. I know what it looks like when the government loses the will to fight.
Quite right! BUMP
I agree with this, but I can't deny it either. One thing that I have sensed is that Dick Cheney is the one with the cajones. That's why my rear bumper says CHENY 07. Bush should resign, let the move-ons deal with Cheney, with Rummy as VP. They will be apoplectic for 18 months.
Hmmm. This doesn't seem to jibe with what General Petraeus has been saying lately about Iran.
While I’m a bit skeptical, I can say one thing for sure that does jibe with this article . . . I have noticed a recent spike in the media of late with military figures talking about how our forces are overstretched in Iraq.
http://icga.blogspot.com/2007/08/post-labor-day-product-rollout-war-with.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.