Posted on 10/08/2007 11:16:26 AM PDT by Stoat
You might be interested in Thomas Sowell’s book, “The Vision of the Anointed”. Basically, he says that a self-appointed elite 1. decide that a certain problem exists (although it may not), 2. and come up with social engineering solutions because they think they know what is best. 3. Conservatives object. 4. The plan is put into action, fails and the self-appointed social engineers deny that they had anything to do with the failure. The problem would have gotten worse if they had done nothing, etc., etc.
I have heard that; but it was secret. Since it’s not generally accepted; I believe they will go along with handicapped;etc; and political.
I was just thinking that I’m glad I have the complete set of MPFC, before it gets edited to remove all anti-queer references.
Does that mean they will arrest Muslims who make anti-gay speeches?
Hmmm, which side to root for in this, the Muslims or the fags?
Is Jack Straw a fagot? I can’t think of another reason he would want a stupid law like this on the books. Christians are called worse than that every day and he says nothing about it.
I would suggest that merely asking the question that you did places you at risk for arrest, as your intent is obviously to incite slanderous antagonism against a Protected Victim Group.
Honored Representatives of the Religion of Peace will be calling on you shortly, with the police in tow.
Revealed The hijab-wearing 17-year-old Muslim girl hired as a community police officer (U.K.)
Surely a good recipe for civilization, huh?
Particularly sad to see in the nation that brought Civilization to so very much of the world.
Remain that way. It's the only was to stay out of jail, at least in the UK.
>>Will Heterophobic commentary bring similar punishments?
I won’t waste a lot of energy hoping........<<
One side effect may be to make it much more difficult for Muslims to immigrate to Britain.
Consistency has never been a significant concern to the Left. When difficult questions are raised, the answer will hinge upon 'feelings' or 'victim status'. Further, more pointed questions are answered by an arrest.
Hollywood now requires Rehab for Hate Speech Offenses.
Therapist's notes court-ordered rehabilitation for hate speech patient Coulter, First Session:
The patient arrives on time, displays pleasant and agreeable affect. She is charming and complimentary about therapist's office, calling it cozy. She asks if the therapist decorated it himself, and when told that he didn't, remarks that she should have known as he doesn't seem gay. Therapist asks why patient instantly assumes that interior decorators are invariably gay. Patient apologizes for the stereotyped response. "I guess this is why I'm here," she says with great sincerity. "I need to learn how to better express myself. I need to learn to stop saying things that upset so many people, to stop saying such hurtful things, using such hateful language. This is going to be a difficult and painful journey for me, I know. But together, I hope we can get to the bottom of it." Therapist compliments patient on her positive attitude. Patient and therapist share a healing hug. "So let me rephrase my statement, if that's okay," patient says. "All interior decorators are not gay--only the good ones are." Patient then bursts out into gales of laughter, points at therapist, and shouts "PSYCH!"
Second Session:
No progress during this session.
Third Session:
Patient arrives on time, upbeat about a new book deal. Patient and therapist talk about this for a moment. Patient is reluctant to share details of the book.
Apparently, a more "stealth" approach to book topics is the norm these days. Still, the patient is reminded that the therapeutic environment is a "safe space," where anything can be shared in total confidence. "Really?" the patient asks. The therapist assures her that anything she says or does within the therapeutic frame is sacred and totally confidential. "Like, if I said the word f*gg*t? That would be okay?" The patient is reminded that one of the reasons she is currently undergoing court-ordered rehabilitation is precisely because of such language. "So this is a safe space where I can say anything I want unless it's what I'm in the safe space for in the first place? Am I the only one to realize that this makes no sense?" The therapist tries once again to explain to the patient that she is here primarily because she seems incapable of not saying whatever is in her mind, irrespective of social norms.
Patient laughs, and remarks that one of the ways to get on the bestseller lists is to speak your mind, then inquires about how the therapist's own book, On Being Nice, is doing at the stores. Therapist suggests that they concentrate on the patient and the patient's book. "That bad, huh?" asks the patient. "Suggestion? Try writing an interesting book. Those usually move faster."
No progress during this session.
Fourth Session:
Patient misses the session, and instead appears on Hannity & Colmes to introduce her new book, entitled Rehab Is for Quitters, in which she promises to expose the "unbelievable liberal nonsense" of the entire rehabilitation-therapy movement. By show's end, Amazon presales hit record highs, far outpacing therapist's own On Being Nice, which languishes at 12,978,675.
No progress during this session.
Exactly how is a euphemism "inciting hatred"? It may show poor etiquette, sure, but hate?!
Asking such questions suggests that you disagree with the State's wisdom and benevolence in it's Diversity initiatives. This is a criminal act and you will be reeducated.
Is this humor? Or is this story for real? I just can’t tell anymore...
Oh, uh, what? This is in Europe? Well then, thats ok, never mind, those people over there are better than us, you know....
I wish that it was humor :-(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.