Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Says She Would Shield Science From Politics
New York Times ^ | October 5, 2007 | PATRICK HEALY and CORNELIA DEAN

Posted on 10/08/2007 4:26:59 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

In the telephone interview after the speech, Mrs. Clinton also tacitly criticized opponents of evolution. Some of the 2008 Republican presidential candidates have said flatly that they do not believe in evolution, while other Republican contenders have said they support teaching evolution, intelligent design and creationist ideas.

“I believe in evolution, and I am shocked at some of the things that people in public life have been saying,” Mrs. Clinton said in the interview. “I believe that our founders had faith in reason and they also had faith in God, and one of our gifts from God is the ability to reason.”.....

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; hillary; intelligentdesign; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
Didn't the Nazi's sheild science from politics too i mean there wasn't anything political about human experimentation was there ? wasn't it pure science ?

Yea Hitlery she's the one

NOT !

21 posted on 10/08/2007 5:05:59 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (In everyday life there is more than meets the eye to reach the depths of truth we must DRAGTHEWATERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Typical Clinton lies. If the Federal government weren’t unconstitutionally involved in science, then it wouldn’t matter in the slightest what any presidential candidate thought about evolution.

I agree with poster who said this is code for “more Federal funding for embryo experimentation.”


22 posted on 10/08/2007 5:08:33 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Lettuce dance, lettuce dance, everyone should lettuce dance!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
If Hillary wants to shield science from government she needs to abolish the Surgeon General's office, end the National Science Foundation, close the CDC in Atlanta, etc.

The government is so deeply involved in science that it is now difficult to figure out what is actually science and what is government sponsored political mythmaking.

Under a Hillary regime expect Second-Hand Smoke to be declared the greatest threat facing the nation after studies "prove" it can kill you if you get within a mile downwind from it....and the only way to prevent getting AIDS is to have promiscuous sex with multiple partners of both sexes and approved animals and plants.



:-(
23 posted on 10/08/2007 5:09:42 AM PDT by cgbg ("I give you health care and I say 'no smoking'". "Yassah Miss Hillary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

So does this mean that she’s going to gag Al Gore?


24 posted on 10/08/2007 5:09:47 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

In other words: “Screw the Human Race! I want POWER!”


25 posted on 10/08/2007 5:10:49 AM PDT by DGHoodini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Talk about double-speak! Or should I say Hillary-speak?


26 posted on 10/08/2007 5:11:39 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Yes. The Nazi’s gave science Carte Blanche to experiment on humans without moral constraint.

In the name of science they froze, burned, poisoned, and worse. All in the name of the state. Hitlery is aptly named.


27 posted on 10/08/2007 5:13:43 AM PDT by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations... pornography, homosexuality, abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It means she will appoint Al Gore to save the earth by destroying civilization.


28 posted on 10/08/2007 5:14:59 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Clinton Says She Would Shield Science From Politics

Clinton Says She Would Sell Science For Politics

29 posted on 10/08/2007 5:15:41 AM PDT by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor; ATOMIC_PUNK

They also exterminated Jews as non-native species.


30 posted on 10/08/2007 5:18:32 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Art I Sec 8 paragraph 8. It doesn’t apply to what she says she would do, but it is a constitutional authorization for Congress “[T]o promote the Progress of Science”.


31 posted on 10/08/2007 5:30:08 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The headline is misleading. Hillary! will only shield the scientific studies with which she agrees. In a recent Boston Magazine article, a black researcher/professor was profiled. His research had determined that adult stem cells were far superior for combating cancer and that embryonic stem cells frequently created new tumors. He was denied tenure. He is suing for discrimination.
32 posted on 10/08/2007 5:34:21 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.


33 posted on 10/08/2007 5:35:41 AM PDT by Perdogg (Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Headline:
Clinton Says She Would Shield Science From Politics

Question: The science of biology?


34 posted on 10/08/2007 5:36:28 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
PS- Said researcher is at Harvard. No surprise. The Ivys have become nothing but repositories for rich liberals. Sadly the stature of the Ivys seems set in stone. I doubt that many look past the Ivy degree to find out if the student had learned anything more than a Marxist approach to life. Not slamming anyone on here with an Ivy degree. Just the majority of the students at those institutions seem to be lacking these days..
35 posted on 10/08/2007 5:38:17 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I recall when Clinton “scientists” were salting woods with lynx hair to “prove” the “endangered” critter roamed the woods.

This, of course, was a ploy by the eco-fascists in the federal Marxist bureaucracy to close more land to the public, as decreed in the UN’s biodiversity treaty, which the US senate rejected in 1994. The treaty was consequently illegally applied via presidential executive order by the Clinton criminal through his office of sustainable development.

And I believe the “scientists” were given raises and transferred to some other bureaucrat department where they continue their work to impose Marxism on rural America.

Heil Hillary! We are heading for a reckoning in this country.


36 posted on 10/08/2007 5:38:42 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Tofu burgers are the last gasp of a dying society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

All liberal philosphy requires a belief in evolution.


37 posted on 10/08/2007 5:41:46 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

What an interesting thought. Is it possible to be a liberal and believe in the Bible as the literal word of God? I should think not. No wonder they hate the religious right.


38 posted on 10/08/2007 5:44:15 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

To shield us from politics she needs to shield us from self government.


39 posted on 10/08/2007 5:45:05 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

This seems more “debate is over” to impose envirowacko socilism without actual scientific examination.

IOW every time socialism by executive fiat is challenged then “we are protecting science from politics” would be claimed.


40 posted on 10/08/2007 5:56:36 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson