Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Muslim medical students get picky (deciding that some topics in medicine conflict with Islam)
The Times (U.K.) ^ | October 7, 2007 | Daniel Foggo and Abul Taher

Posted on 10/06/2007 10:20:08 PM PDT by Stoat

Muslim medical students get picky

 

Some Muslim medical students are refusing to attend lectures or answer exam questions on alcohol-related or sexually transmitted diseases because they claim it offends their religious beliefs.

Some trainee doctors say learning to treat the diseases conflicts with their faith, which states that Muslims should not drink alcohol and rejects sexual promiscuity.

A small number of Muslim medical students have even refused to treat patients of the opposite sex. One male student was prepared to fail his final exams rather than carry out a basic examination of a female patient.

The religious objections by students have been confirmed by the British Medical Association (BMA) and General Medical Council (GMC), which both stressed that they did not approve of such actions.

It will intensify the debate sparked last week by the disclosure that Sainsbury’s is permitting Muslim checkout operators to refuse to handle customers’ alcohol purchases on religious grounds. It means other members of staff have to be called over to scan in wine and beer for them at the till.

Critics, including many Islamic scholars, see the concessions as a step too far, and say Muslims are reneging on their professional responsibilities.

This weekend, however, it emerged that Sainsbury’s is also allowing its Muslim pharmacists to refuse to sell the morning-after pill to customers. At a Sainsbury’s store in Nottingham, a pharmacist named Ahmed declined to provide the pill to a female reporter posing as a customer. A colleague explained to her that Ahmed did not sell the pill for “ethical reasons”. Boots also permits pharmacists to refuse to sell the pill on ethical grounds.

The BMA said it had received reports of Muslim students who did not want to learn anything about alcohol or the effects of overconsumption. “They are so opposed to the consumption of it they don’t want to learn anything about it,” said a spokesman.

The GMC said it had received requests for guidance over whether students could “omit parts of the medical curriculum and yet still be allowed to graduate”. Professor Peter Rubin, chairman of the GMC’s education committee, said: “Examples have included a refusal to see patients who are affected by diseases caused by alcohol or sexual activity, or a refusal to examine patients of a particular gender.”

He added that “prejudicing treatment on the grounds of patients’ gender or their responsibility for their condition would run counter to the most basic principles of ethical medical practice”.

Shazia Ovaisi, a GP in north London, said one of her male Muslim contemporaries at medical school failed to complete his training because he refused to examine a woman patient as part of his final exams.

“He was academically gifted, one of the best students, but gradually he got in with certain Islamic groups and started to become more radical,” said Ovaisi.

“You could see there was a change in his personality as time went by. During the final exams he was supposed to treat a female patient in hospital. He refused to do it, even though it would have been a very basic examination, nothing intrusive.

“But he refused and as a result he failed his exams. I was quite shocked and disappointed about it because I don’t see there being anything in our religion that prohibits us from examining male and female patients.”

Both the Muslim Council of Britain and Muslim Doctors and Dentist Association said they were aware of students opting out but did not support them.

Dr Abdul Majid Katme, of the Islamic Medical Association, said: “To learn about alcohol, to learn about sexually transmitted disease, to learn about abortion, it gives us more evidence to campaign against it. There is a difference between learning and practising.

“It is obligatory for Muslim doctors and students to learn about everything. The prophet said, ‘Learn about witchcraft, but don’t practise it’.”



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; dhimmitude; doctors; england; greatbritain; healthcare; islam; islamofascism; islamofascists; medicalstudent; medicalstudents; medicine; muslim; muslims; pharmacists; physcians; uk; ukmuslims; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: darkangel82
Let ‘em flunk.

But will that stop them from still calling themselves doctors, and still practicing what bit of doctoring that they did learn?

-PJ

81 posted on 10/08/2007 2:55:02 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
They probably won't treat a Jew or they will treat them with the wrong meds and kill them medically.

After all aren't Jews, Christians and Homosexuals the infidels?

82 posted on 10/08/2007 3:38:09 PM PDT by oswegodeee (Dee ( Born and raised in the south, yummy corn bread and BBQ ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grammy

Thanks for bringing up this important point. Many people do not know how to recognize a diabetic with low blood sugar. They will most likely think that they are drunk.

It could be a dangerous situation and the diabetic could die.

One of my cousins is diabetic and I’ve been with her several times when she had an insulin reaction or low blood sugar and she or I was lucky that I knew how to deal with it. I know how to test her BSL or get her to a clinic or get her some carbs or glucose tabs to get her levels back up to a safe level.

People should know that diabetics with a low blood sugar level can appear drunk and become very uncooperative, stubborn or beligerent. They also can’t think straight under these conditions.


83 posted on 10/08/2007 5:45:07 PM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Agree, they might be better at treating Goats instead. Ship them back to the sand dunes. Amen.


84 posted on 10/09/2007 2:44:46 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grams A
It’s been more a question of individual pharmacists, not individual pharmacies. You might pick up a “code phrase” in a pharmacy ad (”SonRise Pharmacy” etc) but otherwise you wouldn't know from ads. It’d have to be individual networking: church groups, etc. The individual pharmacists you've heard about have been working for large companies and have gotten into trouble for refusing to fill prescriptions.
85 posted on 10/09/2007 10:14:47 AM PDT by ER Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

TROP offends my beliefs. The Brits should send them packing to some crapistan..


86 posted on 10/09/2007 12:35:49 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Ah, yes, bringing modern day medicene back into the 7th century due to liberalism.


87 posted on 10/09/2007 12:37:13 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson