Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traviskicks
Let me ask you a question. Who do you think the terrorists enjoy watching more on TV? Aljazeera or the [9/11]commission coverage in the United States? I say it’s a toss-up. I say the terrorists are having trouble making up their minds which is better for them — the press coverage of the commission hearings in this country or Aljazeera, their own network in the Middle East.

-Rush Limbaugh

Read what you post. The paragraph's point you post wasn't the 9/11 commission but the MSM coverage of same.

We are reviewing the testimony, the grilling, the interrogation of noted criminal Dr. Condoleezza Rice who appeared before the law today, the 9/11 Commission attempting to assign blame and seeking to affix it to the Bush administration via beating up on the girl. Only in Washington when the girl is a Republican and a black can you beat up on her.

-Rush Limbaugh

Thanks for the fodder. Rush's point is the attempt to assign blame here in the US. Ron Paul's agreeing to further investigations is just more of the piling-on-blame game. And this video shows him amenable to that.

Of course Rush isn't a Truther. In the above examples you so thoughtlessly post he's criticizing efforts of that sort. But Ron Paul isn't criticizing them. He's showing himself happy to further such efforts.

That's despicable.

150 posted on 10/05/2007 11:31:48 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: bcsco

Perhaps this is clearer, Rush Limbaugh on the 9/11 commission and the coming feature ‘path to 9/11’ by ABC which he thinks would present a more accurate picture, just like Paul believes a new 9/11 investigation would yield a more accurate picture:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=157383

You know, folks, the whole 9/11 Commission, if you go back and look at these things that we know now, the Clinton administration’s ability to camouflage history, to rewrite it, is just amazing. Look at who they got on the 9/11 Commission. They got Jamie Gorelick, who authored the wall, and this mini-series explains the wall and gives illustrations of fact of how it hurt our ability to capture Osama bin Laden. I’ll get to that in just a second. They had had Gorelick on there; they had Ben-Veniste (who was a partisan hack lawyer from the Watergate days), and Tim Roemer, who is a Democrat from Indiana, and that was to ensure that the Clinton administration was protected, and so that the top structural explanation for intelligence failure was white-washed.

Look, the 9/11 committee was nothing more than camouflage. In fact, you know what the word for it was? To get Gorelick and Tim Roemer and Ben-Veniste on the 9/11 Commission, they were censors. What Clinton wants ABC to do is censor certain things.

What surprises us is the whitewash of all this and how they were so successful at doing it at the 9/11 Commission.


156 posted on 10/05/2007 11:46:33 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson