oh common, he’s just saying that government is incompetant and trying to cover their @sses and that these political and ideological charades of investigations (’charade’ was the term used by Rush Limbaugh to describe the 9/11 commission) just lead to recommendations for bigger and greater government and more freedom restrictions.
You recall, the 9/11 comission recommended a consolidation into a new ‘homeland security’ agency, I mean, what is the point? The government is a joke, we conservatives are quick to recongize that economically, yet somehow when it comes to security and foreign policy ‘conservatives’ seem to gain some sort of trust that government can take care of us and protect us... I’m not quite sure why this is...
Truthers apparently eat this sort of stuff up, but they are reading into it the wrong way, as are many on FR who associate Paul with Truthers.
I challange anyone to post anything controversial Ron Paul says today on the Alex Jones program, or any statements he’s said on past programs and I think you won’t find any. He’s running for President and he’s going to be on radio shows across the county. Before he was on Alex Jones a lot cuz no one else would take him, this is now changing. :)
Then why does he agree that further investigations are necessary? He could shut this down by simply telling the Truther he's not going along with any investigation because their claims are fanciful. But he doesn't (and hasn't) done that.
The more he seeks attention (by attending shows like Alex Jones) in these circles the more he makes the real world question his honesty if not his sanity. And your explanations are nothing more than spin. Before he was on Alex Jones a lot cuz no one else would take him, this is now changing. :) So, if I read you right he goes on Alex Jones for exposure. Yet he doesn't in any way support their beliefs. It's exposure, pure and simple. If true, the black truth to that is he's courting a segment of the voting public he has no intention of representing once in office. He's misleading and lying to them. Either that or he does support their beliefs and his denials to us are the untruths. Which is it? is he lying to them or to us? You can't have it both ways.
Don't put it off on 'this is what politicians do to get elected'. It's far beyond that. It's either openly pandering a group he doesn't respect or defrauding the conservative wing of the GOP (to which he openly subscribes) when he's in effect a closet Truther.