To: Boxen
"In which journal was the falsification criteria published? Journal name and date will suffice; I'd like to look up the article on my own." It's not considered controversial enough for publication. Everyone knows that Man creates all transgenic lab animals like pigs that grow human hormones for sale to pharmaceutical companies. Man is Intelligent. Hence, ID explains transgenic beasts through the empirical observations in our labs.
Perhaps you'd like to argue that Evolutionary Theory explains such transgenic animals, instead?!
105 posted on
10/05/2007 8:31:20 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
It's not considered controversial enough for publication. Everyone knows that Man creates all transgenic lab animals like pigs that grow human hormones for sale to pharmaceutical companies. Man is Intelligent. Hence, ID explains transgenic beasts through the empirical observations in our labs.
In other words, ID fails your own test. There is no "specific peer-reviewed falsification criteria" for intelligent design. Ergo, intelligent design is unfalsifiable.
108 posted on
10/05/2007 8:39:48 AM PDT by
Boxen
(If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards...Checkmate!)
To: Southack
Non-sequitur. The existence of transgenic animals only proves that ID is possible, not that it is responsible for the existence of all life. The claim is akin to asserting that the existence of Ford automobiles is proof that all automobiles were made by Ford.
173 posted on
10/05/2007 9:57:50 AM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson