Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw
Plus no one adopts hands off policies in their personal lives.

When left with a minimum level of governmental interference, individuals pursue what they believe is in their own rational self-interest. That's not libertarian BS. Moreover, it's the statists who think that government's role be expanded and individual liberty curtailed in the name of some amorphous good. In other words, one's rational self-interest should be determined by someone else. That's BS.

427 posted on 10/05/2007 11:31:12 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
When left with a minimum level of governmental interference, individuals pursue what they believe is in their own rational self-interest. That's not libertarian BS. Moreover, it's the statists who think that government's role be expanded and individual liberty curtailed in the name of some amorphous good. In other words, one's rational self-interest should be determined by someone else. That's BS.

Regurgitated libertarianism. We have a bloated Federal government and it should pursue policies abroad that are in our self interest. Such as lowering our trade deficit to avoid a dollar crash. But instead the Feds are doing all kinds of other things they shouldn't. They won't even defend our Mexico borderer

429 posted on 10/05/2007 11:41:59 AM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy; dennisw
This idea that government should leave business alone, is a great idea for a small economy producing simple, basic goods & services that consumers can understand.

But the modern economy is—unfortunately— too large and what it produces too complex, to leave all decisions to the marketplace.

437 posted on 10/05/2007 12:20:57 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
Moreover, it's the statists who think that government's role be expanded and individual liberty curtailed in the name of some amorphous good. In other words, one's rational self-interest should be determined by someone else. That's BS.

That would be true except for two things.

1) People often pursue irrational self-interest such as smoking, not wearing seatbelts, going through life 40 pounds or more overweight, etc. (I choose these examples because they are not controversial in the context of this thread.)

2) The societal costs of irrational self interest does affect other people considerable, giving them incentive and in some cases the duty to react.

Libertarianism is based on an idealized version of human interactions.

Cheers!

507 posted on 10/05/2007 6:23:47 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson