Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/03/2007 1:00:29 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Patel, Marilyn Hall
Born 1938 in Amsterdam, NY

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by Jimmy Carter on May 9, 1980, to a seat vacated by Lloyd Hudson Burke; Confirmed by the Senate on June 26, 1980, and received commission on June 30, 1980. Served as chief judge, 1997-2004.

Education:
Wheaton College, B.A., 1959

Fordham University School of Law, J.D., 1963

Professional Career:
Private practice, New York City, 1963-1967
Attorney, Immigration & Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice, San Francisco, 1967-1971
Private practice, San Francisco, California, 1971-1976
Adjunct professor of law, University of California, San Francisco, Hastings College of Law, 1974-1976
Judge, Municipal Court, Oakland-Piedmont Judicial District, State of California, 1976-1980


Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Female

2 posted on 10/03/2007 1:01:09 PM PDT by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just a busload of lawyers going off a cliff would not even be a start.


3 posted on 10/03/2007 1:02:21 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
What a waste of time. If Target doesn’t want your business, go somewhere that does. Or better yet, get together with a developer and make a gateway site that adds the needed code, and take advantage of Target’s marketing programs to pay for these improvements.
4 posted on 10/03/2007 1:03:45 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"Ahh Now if I could only find that dang computer. "


5 posted on 10/03/2007 1:04:10 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

“A federal judge granted class-action status to a lawsuit alleging that Target Corp. is breaking California and federal law by failing to make its Web site usable for the blind.”

I spit coffee when I read that. Where are the napkins?


6 posted on 10/03/2007 1:04:34 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Sounds like this will result in further discrimination. It’s fine for blind people, but what about people who are both blind AND deaf, and also need access to Target’s site? Don’t they have rights too?


7 posted on 10/03/2007 1:05:34 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
How long before Lawyers will demand that cars should be made safe for the blind to drive?
8 posted on 10/03/2007 1:06:00 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Explain something to me here. Is California saying that ALL websites must accomodate the blind in this fashion? If so, they will put a lot of small companies out of business.


10 posted on 10/03/2007 1:07:44 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO MAKE FR ACCESSIBLE TO THE BLIND?

11 posted on 10/03/2007 1:08:54 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Dang. Accomodation has gone a bit far hasn’t it? This is absurd. 99% of all lawyers give the other 1% a bad name.


13 posted on 10/03/2007 1:15:53 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"This is a tremendous step forward for blind people throughout the country who for too long have been denied equal access to the Internet economy," said Dr. Marc Maurer, president of the National Federation of the Blind. "All e-commerce businesses should take note of this decision and immediately take steps to open their doors to the blind."

Take note because actual accessibility is not the issue -- extortion is.

Judge Patel's order Friday noted that Target has modified its Web site some since the suit's filing to make the site more accessible to the blind. Target claimed the suit should therefore be dismissed, but Judge Patel ruled against that argument.

That's great. Don't even give the company an opportunity to fix the web site before you sic the attorneys on them.

This is a racket that was used against a number of brick-and-mortar businesses throughout California in the past, including one owned by Clint Eastwood.

14 posted on 10/03/2007 1:16:11 PM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

All HTML sites are readable by the blind by readers the blind have, like the deaf by special phones.

I am surprised Target’s site is not HTML, I would guess it was however some parts are not.

It seems to be a trivial change for Target to go HTML so this seems like a waste of time.


17 posted on 10/03/2007 1:21:15 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

What do these folks want? A website in Braille?

I have trouble reading very fine print on some websites. I either enlarge the text or fix the resolution. Not that hard to do.


19 posted on 10/03/2007 1:24:54 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just a little more impure touching myself and I can cash in on the lawsuit!


22 posted on 10/03/2007 1:35:47 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (Bring me the head of Miley Cyrus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Is this like the Braille on the keypads of drive thru ATM’s?

Sheesh.

I’m sure that voice technology is has not caught up everywhere. I guess you get sued for not keeping up, these days.


23 posted on 10/03/2007 1:36:41 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Here is a photo of Judge Patel sharing a drink (essence of Gelfling) with some totally irrelevant dude.

I'm Guessing their drinks cost at least a half-dozen Gelflings their essence.


26 posted on 10/03/2007 2:13:38 PM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Is this really an issue? Blind people surfing the web? This makes as much sense as having braille on the ATMs.


29 posted on 10/03/2007 2:57:19 PM PDT by MissEdie (Liberalscostlives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson