Skip to comments.
Obama wants nuclear free world (OMG Me2!)
afp ^
| October 2, 2007
Posted on 10/02/2007 12:56:25 PM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: presidio9
I’d agree with Obama if...
The rest of the world was populated by Amish.
21
posted on
10/02/2007 1:34:34 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: presidio9
22
posted on
10/02/2007 1:35:28 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: wbill
Note to self, make sure Obama has a really, really good VP, before voting for him. If Obama somehow managed to get elected president, what terrorist worthy of the name would be neighborly enough to get rid of him for us?
23
posted on
10/02/2007 1:35:40 PM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: presidio9
Reminds me of John Edwards promising that he and Kerry would cure the crippled and blind. These mindless, absurd promises only demonstrate their contempt for the electorate.
24
posted on
10/02/2007 1:36:03 PM PDT
by
Spok
To: SuziQ
I do not want a nuclear-free world. Can you imagine having to fight man-to-man the Russians and Chinese? We would be totally outnumbered. The only thing I regret is that they too have the bomb. Because of the bomb we survived the Cold War.
25
posted on
10/02/2007 1:45:12 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(Government is the opiate of the people.)
To: presidio9
Peace & Love........................
26
posted on
10/02/2007 1:45:55 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: presidio9
The orator, the appointed pied piper leading the sheep to slaughter......./Just Asking - seoul62.......
27
posted on
10/02/2007 1:49:55 PM PDT
by
seoul62
(Just asking, Seoul62)
To: jonyyeh
"The only reason why we still need to keep Nuclear weapons is because what if North Korea or Iran gets Nukes?" Apparently, Obama thinks North Korea already did. From the article: "India and Pakistan and North Korea have joined the club of nuclear-armed nations."
I thought we had determined that their little test last year was a failure, and that they do not yet have a nuclear capability. You'd think somebody that wants to be the leader of the free world would at least be up on the intel.
To: presidio9
"In July, Clinton branded Obama "irresponsible" and "naive"..." Well, it's not every day that I agree with something that comes out of her mouth...
29
posted on
10/02/2007 1:57:47 PM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(SPAM: best in the can and in sammiches -- not for use on computers.)
To: presidio9
Interesting as it happens only last night was watching the History Channel on just this subject.
A guy came on who said that if you plotted out worldwide deaths per year from warfare over time there is a PRECIPITOUS drop that occurs in 1945. The unavoidable conclusion is that the discovery of the A-bomb has saved lives!
I wonder if Obama has read these data and has a response?
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
A guy came on who said that if you plotted out worldwide deaths per year from warfare over time there is a PRECIPITOUS drop that occurs in 1945. It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that Japan Surrendered on August 15th, would it?
I'm guessing more human beings died on August 6th and 9th 1945 than just about any otherday in History. The firebombings of Dresden and Tokyo went on for several days.
31
posted on
10/02/2007 2:11:41 PM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: presidio9
I think you’ve missed the point a little bit. This guy was saying the average number of deaths per year going back a VERY long time, was very high until 1945 - and then it has been quite low ever since. Not a one time difference betweeen ‘45 and ‘46.
To: presidio9
US Democratic White House hopeful Barack Obama on Tuesday called for the elimination of all the world's nuclear weapons
I call for a presidential race in which candidates don't make childish, impossible demands for realities to change and instead explain how they will deal with those realities. Neither Obama nor I are likely to get our respective wishes.
To: presidio9
Free: All you can eat Peaches and Cream for everyone starting tomorrow!!!!
34
posted on
10/02/2007 2:50:42 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
To: presidio9
Awwwwww!
*snif*
Group hug!
35
posted on
10/02/2007 2:52:58 PM PDT
by
TChris
(Governments don't RAISE money; they TAKE it.)
To: presidio9
"India and Pakistan and North Korea have joined the club of nuclear-armed nations, and Iran is knocking on the door. More nuclear weapons and more nuclear-armed nations mean more danger to us all.
I wonder if Obama would back out of the nuclear technology deal Bush signed with India? Hope someone asks him about it at the next debate or townhall.
To: presidio9
That’s funny. It’s commie dems in government who sold our nuclear secrets to other nations. Dems cause turmoil and strife in the world and then turn around and complain about it.
I'm not afraid that America will lose a propaganda battle with a petty tyrant -- we need to go before the world and win those battles. When Obama stops thinking in terms of propaganda battles, he may join the adults at the big table.
To: presidio9
Where does he stand on Clean Water?
39
posted on
10/02/2007 4:21:19 PM PDT
by
proudpapa
(Thompson and/or Hunter.)
To: humblegunner
Maybe madrass educated Barak Hussein Obama really is the Manchurian candidate and not the other possiblility, a moron.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
