Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some in Fairfax public housing make six figures
Washington Post ^ | September 30, 2007 | Amy Gardner

Posted on 10/01/2007 6:02:45 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

Hundreds of families living in housing subsidized by Fairfax County taxpayers exceed income caps designed to ensure that only the neediest receive assistance....

Fairfax is underwriting rents for families making well into six figures: One household getting help makes more than $216,000 a year; another, $184,000. Dozens of others -- making $60,000, $70,000, $90,000 -- exceed eligibility caps. And they do so with the tacit approval of county housing administrators, who do little to encourage occupants to move on when their fortunes improve.

These tenants live in housing intended for families at the bottom of the county's economic spectrum. They are in the federally subsidized public housing program, the Fairfax rental program and the county's senior housing program. The county...will spend about $4.5 million this year running these programs...

...Board of Supervisors Chairman Gerald E. Connolly (D) helped establish an initiative in 2005 to funnel more than $20 million a year toward the preservation of lower-cost housing...

County housing officials emphasize -- and a review of county and federal housing rules confirms -- that they have broken no rules by letting tenants remain after their incomes rise. They say every household met eligibility caps when they entered the program. Officials also say that to turn families out would punish them for attaining self-sufficiency....

But records show that the highest annual household income in Fairfax public housing is $216,325. The next is $136,957, then $112,500, then $105,603 and so on. All told, 111 households -- about 10 percent -- make more than half of the area's median income...

In both the rental program and the senior housing program, the county has less latitude to push families out when their incomes rise: Many of the units are funded through federal programs that prohibit income-based evictions...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: subsidizedhousing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Affordable housing is affordable because someone else is paying for it. My and your taxpayer dollars at work. Needless to say, the six-figure families are, shall we say, not native Americans. My nominee for the stupidest statement in this story: Officials also say that to turn families out would punish them for attaining self-sufficiency.
1 posted on 10/01/2007 6:02:50 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Outrageous. We need to boot Connolly out and bring in Baise. I wonder how many of these affluent residents receiving subsidies are US citizens.


2 posted on 10/01/2007 6:05:23 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Why is it every time someone gets a job you couldn’t pay me enough to take on, everyone complains about how much that person is making?
3 posted on 10/01/2007 6:07:23 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Officials also say that to turn families out would punish them for attaining self-sufficiency.


Amazing logic, isn’t it. When your major “touchstone” for making decisions is tolerance and feelings............
4 posted on 10/01/2007 6:07:53 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: kabar

Wonder how many of these affluent residents receiving subsidies are US citizens? I bet none are US Citizens, they are not and never want to be...only US Citizens have to worry about obeying the Laws!
Afforsable housing...another Lib wet dream, financed by Taxpayers to guarantee the votes from the TaxEaters!!


6 posted on 10/01/2007 6:10:45 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Ignore my previous post. I just read the article. What a bunch of low-lifes.
7 posted on 10/01/2007 6:11:23 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrPR

There is so much waste, fraud, and abuse in these government run programs, yet the Dems want to takeover running healthcare for the nation.


8 posted on 10/01/2007 6:12:39 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

jokes on the libs, I take advantage of these programs and vote Republican.


9 posted on 10/01/2007 6:13:37 AM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I figured out a long time ago that whenever the government hands out free money, you’re going to have cheaters. It astounds me that we have public largesse run by people who can’t figure that out - or intentionally don’t want to.


10 posted on 10/01/2007 6:18:31 AM PDT by popdonnelly (No more no win wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I think people should realize that government has become one big system of corruption - that “doing good” is really handing out taxpayer money for political reasons.


11 posted on 10/01/2007 6:20:00 AM PDT by popdonnelly (No more no win wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

Unbelievable that many of the units are funded through federal programs that PROHIBIT income-based evictions...


12 posted on 10/01/2007 6:21:07 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

While I do not doubt that some listed tenants in these public housing projects have six figure incomes, I seriously question that anyone with that kind of income would actually live there. I would bet that on further investigation these individuals have sublet their subsidized housing for a profitable rent.


13 posted on 10/01/2007 6:31:57 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

We have a housing crisis in this country and the gov’t must step to the plate to provide our mortgage payments. Personally, I will be money ahead to have the gov’t pay my mortgage rather than pay my healthcare. I also think they should contemplate a car program.


14 posted on 10/01/2007 6:39:07 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

My nominee for the stupidest statement in this story: Officials also say that to turn families out would punish them for attaining self-sufficiency.”

The taxpayers are being punished for being “self-sufficient”, IMO.


15 posted on 10/01/2007 6:41:13 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

First, this is not substandard housing. Fairfax has gone out of its way to provide very nice, spacious, all amenities included housing for those it assists. Second, many of the people living in that housing are not Americans and have a different set of standards. To them, that housing is a thousand times better than anything they could ever get at home. If taxpayers will help them live there, so much the better. We are suckers being taken for a ride by the likes of Gerald Connolly. That said, it would not surprise me that they were subletting rooms.


16 posted on 10/01/2007 6:45:25 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Self sufficiency is a goal and reward in itself, not punishment. Only a loony leftie would make it sound negative to take care of oneself.


17 posted on 10/01/2007 6:48:23 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
I figured out a long time ago that whenever the government hands out free money, you’re going to have cheaters.

Just wait till Hillary starts giving out $5000.00 to every new born child.

The anchor baby explosion will multiply infinitely.

18 posted on 10/01/2007 6:48:42 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
I figured out a long time ago that whenever the government hands out free money, you’re going to have cheaters.

Just wait till Hillary starts giving out $5000.00 to every new born child.

The anchor baby explosion will multiply infinitely.

19 posted on 10/01/2007 6:49:02 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Officials also say that to turn families out would punish them for attaining self-sufficiency....

Ah yes, the "Officials"....

20 posted on 10/01/2007 6:51:29 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson