Posted on 10/01/2007 4:32:28 AM PDT by Man50D
"The NAFTA Superhighway stops here, at the border with Oklahoma," Randy Brogdon, a Republican state senator who has championed the fight to keep the Trans-Texas Corridor out of Oklahoma, told a packed 300-person audience at the first public meeting of OK-SAFE in Tulsa on Saturday.
Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise, Inc. is a non-profit, Oklahoma corporation set up to oppose the NAFTA Superhighway and the North American Union, as threats to the sovereignty of the United States.
Brogdon objected to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America www.spp.gov, arguing that President Bush had entered the agreement after secret discussions with Mexico's then-president Vicente Fox and Canada's then-prime minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.
"President Bush has proven that he is more than willing to over-step his executive authority when it came to trade policy," Brogdon told the group.
"Ariticle 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution says, 'Congress shall have the Power to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,' not the president," Brogdon pointed out. "Yet President Bush has entered into an agreement with Mexico and Canada called SPP that seeks to eliminate our trade and security borders and he has failed to get the explicit approval of Congress
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
And who is going to buy your stuff when we are all working for chicom/mexican wages?
“We’re pointing at you and laughing.”
You and the other ‘naysayers’ do so at your own expense and personally, I don’t think you’re not fooling anyone. Just curious, if we were to go back through and search your posts, how many of these things would we find to be true....
You supported Bush/Kennedy’s comprehensive immigration reform?
You support the creation of yet another guest worker program?
You support some type of amnesty/path to citizenship for the hardworking illegal aliens?
You often support your YES to the previous statement by claiming that it is impossible to round up and deport 12 million illegal aliens.
You support keeping the borders as open as possible for the sake of the economy?
You believe the Council on Foreign Relations to be merely a bi-partisan think tank?
You support Fred Thompson for President?
I don’t know about BA levels, but I heard that open alcohol will be allowed, as long as it’s a nice French vintage.
Maybe we should pay the longshoremen $400K a year and watch the resulting economic boom?
You're working for chicom/mexican wages?
We’re talking about a road.
still waiting for a link to backup the $60/hr claim.
Knock yourself out.
You supported Bush/Kennedy’s comprehensive immigration reform?
No.
You support the creation of yet another guest worker program?
No.
You support some type of amnesty/path to citizenship for the hardworking illegal aliens?
No.
You often support your YES to the previous statement by claiming that it is impossible to round up and deport 12 million illegal aliens.
I don't think we need to round up 12 million illegals. If we make it hard enough for them to get a job and cut off government payments to them, they'll deport themselves. It's already happening in Arizona, IIRC.
You support keeping the borders as open as possible for the sake of the economy?
No. We need a big wall. Now.
And I’m wondering how many dozens of times I’ve posted the info.
Repeat after me “Bush is king, Bush is king. I refuse to think for myself, everything that Bush says or does is good, I am a robot and will resort to using the tin hat on anyone who uses objective evidence against my leader and ultimate supreme being President Bush”....
Hope that helps to remind you of your training before you started posting on this board.
Bingo.
It pretty much just makes the Senator look foolish. Where was his staff on this one?
“We’re talking about a road.”
Feign ignorance all you like. We know you’re much smarter than that.
LOL—”Bush is not king. Bush is not king. The blue helmets will come for me if I have a busted taillight.”
Smart enough to wonder why the discussion of an interstate highway (that already connects to Canada and Mexico) needs to become a discussion about amnesty.
That's easy enough, but that wouldn't be nearly as easy and dramatic as making things up. Like this: "Kimberly GG keeps saying she wants to end all life on the planet".
Hey, that is difficult. I hadn't considered the "feeling like an idiot" part, just how is it that you're able to deal with that anyway?
or how you must be an evil stooge of the New World Order if you don’t believe every conspiracy theory you read on the Internet, lol.
Yet President Bush has entered into an agreement with Mexico and Canada called SPP that seeks to eliminate our trade and security borders and he has failed to get the explicit approval of Congress
It is, unfortunately, considerably more involved than just highway "driving rules". It is part of the infrastructure necessary to form the NAU, which of course will be a part of the FTAA someday.
How does losing our national sovreignty grab you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.