The Government will be given access to details of every phone call in Britain. (Posed by model)
Posted on 09/29/2007 11:31:20 PM PDT by Stoat
Officials from the top of Government to lowly council officers will be given unprecedented powers to access details of every phone call in Britain under laws coming into force tomorrow.
The new rules compel phone companies to retain information, however private, about all landline and mobile calls, and make them available to some 795 public bodies and quangos.
The move, enacted by the personal decree of Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, will give police and security services a right they have long demanded: to delve at will into the phone records of British citizens and businesses.
Scroll down for more...
The Government will be given access to details of every phone call in Britain. (Posed by model)
But the same powers will also be handed to the tax authorities, 475 local councils, and a host of other organisations, including the Food Standards Agency, the Department of Health, the Immigration Service, the Gaming Board and the Charity Commission. The initiative, formulated in the wake of the Madrid and London terrorist attacks
of 2004 and 2005, was put forward as a vital tool in the fight against terrorism. However, civil liberties campaigners say the new powers amount to a 'free for all' for the State snooping on its citizens.
And they angrily questioned why the records were being made available to so many organisations. Similar provisions are being brought in across Europe, but under much tighter regulation. In Britain, say critics, private and sensitive information will inevitably fall into the wrong hands.
Records will detail precisely what calls are made, their time and duration, and the name and address of the registered user of the phone.
The files will even reveal where people are when they made mobile phone calls. By knowing which mast transmitted the signal, officials will be able to pinpoint the source of a call to within a few feet. This can even be used to track someone's route if, for example, they make a call from a moving car.
Files will also be kept on the sending and receipt of text messages.
By 2009 the Government plans to extend the rules to cover internet use: the websites we have visited, the people we have emailed and phone calls made over the net.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has spearheaded the move to give police and security services access to the phone records of British citizens and businesses.
Many of the organisations granted access to the records already have systems allowing them to search phone-call databases over a computer link without needing staff at the phone company to intervene.
Police requests for phone records will need the approval of a superintendent or inspector, while council officials must get permission from the authority's assistant chief officer. Thousands of staff in other agencies will be legally entitled to retrieve the records once the request is approved by a senior official.
The new measures were implemented after the Home Secretary signed a 'statutory instrument' on July 26. The process allows the Government to alter laws without a full act of Parliament.
The move was nodded through the House of Lords two days earlier without a debate.
It puts into UK law a European Directive aimed at the 'investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime'. But the British law allows the information to be used much more widely to combat all crimes, however minor.
The huge number of organisations allowed to access this data was attacked by Liberty, the civil liberties campaign group. Other organisations allowed to see the data include the Royal Navy Regulating Branch, the Atomic Energy Authority Constabulary, the Department of Trade and Industry, NHS Trusts, ambulance and fire services, the Department of Transport and the Department for the Environment.
A spokesman for Liberty said: 'Hundreds of bodies have been given the power to look at this highly sensitive information. It is yet another example of how greater and greater access is being given to information on our movements with little debate and little public accountability.
'It is a free for all. There is a lack of oversight of how and why public bodies are using these records. There is no public record of what they are using this information for.'
Tony Bunyan, of civil liberties group Statewatch, said: 'The retention of everyone's communications data is a momentous decision, one that should not be slipped through Parliament without anyone noticing.'
Last year, the voluntary arrangement allowed 439,000 searches of phone records. But the Government brought in legislation because the industry did not routinely keep all the information it wanted.
Different authorities will have different levels of access to the systems. Police and intelligence services will be able to see more detailed information than local authorities. And officials at NHS Trusts and ambulance and fire services can obtain the records only in rare cases when, for example, they are trying to save a patient's life.
The new system will be overseen by the Interception of Communications Commissioner, who also ensures security and intelligence services' phone taps are legal.
The commissioner, Sir Paul Kennedy, reports to the Prime Minister and already carries out random inspections of some agencies legally allowed to see phone records under the existing voluntary scheme. Last year inspectors visited 22 councils already making 'significant' use of their powers' to access phone records. A report said the results were 'variable', but within the law.
Privacy watchdog the Information Commissioner, which has responsibly for protecting personal information and policing the Data Protection Act had virtually no role in the new laws.
A spokeswoman said its only function was to ensure 'data security' at the phone companies, adding: 'We have no oversight role over the release of this information.'
The Home Office said there were safeguards to ensure the new law was being used properly. Every authority had a nominated senior member of staff who was legally responsible for the use the phone data was put to, 'the integrity of the process' and for 'reporting errors'.
A spokesman said: 'The most detailed level of data can be accessed only by law enforcement agencies such as the police. More basic access is available to local authority bodies such as trading standards and environmental health who can only use these powers to prevent and detect crime.'
A spokesman for the Local Government Association, which represents councils across England and Wales, said: 'Councils would only use these powers in circumstances such as benefit fraud, when the taxpayer is being ripped off for many thousands of pounds.'
He added that it was 'very unlikely' the powers would be used against non-payers of council tax or for parking fines 'as the sums involved are not sufficient to justify the use of this sort of information or the costs involved in applying it'.
May God Bless our Dear British Friends, and Protect them from their own Government :-(
“And they angrily questioned why the records were being made available to so many organisations.”
As they should.
Is that “Britania” in that photo, or a younger Joan Collins? And, good sir, what is a “quango” as used in the article’s text? I couldn’t puzzle out any meaningful acronym.
By 2009 the Government plans to extend the rules to cover internet use: the websites we have visited, the people we have emailed and phone calls made over the net.
I recall that some weeks ago, Bill O'Reilly referred to Free Republic as a "hate site", a sentiment long held by the hysterical Left.
Hopefully our British FReeper Friends won't be placed on a 'special list' and subjected to increased surveillance and harassment because they have gone to a site classified as a 'hate site', or emailed someone who has...
http://freehaven.net/anonbib/topic.html
Home PC users in the UK and EU have less than a year to drastically expand the numbers of nodes in I2P networks. They either hang together or hang separately. Only through creating a extremely robust network will the government be thwarted from encapsulating the entirety of network traffic on the British Isles.
It does look a bit like Joan, doesn't it? No, it's merely a random picture of one of God's Angels culled from the internet.
And, good sir,
You're very kind :-)
what is a “quango” as used in the article’s text? I couldn’t puzzle out any meaningful acronym.
“If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about,” authorities said. “We’re here to help!”
Home PC users in the UK and EU have less than a year to drastically expand the numbers of nodes in I2P networks. They either hang together or hang separately. Only through creating a extremely robust network will the government be thwarted from encapsulating the entirety of network traffic on the British Isles.
Interesting page, and there seem to be quite a few articles pertaining to network privacy posted there.. I don't suppose there's a single, simple plan that home PC users can implement that will allow them to do as you suggest? Most people who are not networking specialists will look at a page like that and their eyes will glaze over.
Is there a simple plan, easily understood by average folks, that you would recommend?
And people who do not wish to be 'helped' are placed on a 'special list'......
LMAO!!!
LMAO!!!
Yeah, if I were in the UK and they took an interest in monitoring my telephone, they would get pretty bored awfully quickly.
http://www.epic.org/privacy/carnivore/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(FBI)
http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2000/07/37503
“The files will even reveal where people are when they made mobile phone calls.”
wrong.
they will reveal where the TELEPHONE was.....
This will one day be used against citizens who say un-PC things on their phones. Anyone who says “merry Christmas”, or “religion of peace” will be arrested. One day. Coming soon.
I wonder if the Brits finally realize why we split away from them 231 years ago?
I wonder if this person of "authority" realizes that that works in both directions? Cockroaches rarely scatter until the light is turned on......
"hacker" ought to be a vocation in the church.
Had Britain not let in millions of hostile aliens over the last 40 years this would not have happened.
The only thing that will hold together such a society is a police state, one that will never end.
I would suggest using Tor / Onion, inside firefox, using several other extensions to block firefox addons (quicktime, java, activeX, etc) from compromising your anonymity.
http://tor.eff.org/download.html.en is a good place to start.
https://www.ironkey.com/ is another option I haven’t read much about yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.