Posted on 09/29/2007 7:49:24 AM PDT by jdm
Fresh off of pushing for an expansion of S-CHIP into the middle class and adding tens of billions of dollars on insurance subsidies, Hillary Clinton decided to create another entitlement program for her cradle-to-grave nanny state vision. In her address to the Congressional Black Caucus, Hillary said she'd like to spend $20 billion each year on checks to newborn infants:
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 "baby bond" from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.
Clinton, her party's front-runner in the 2008 race, made the suggestion during a forum hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus.
"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home," she said.
The New York senator did not offer any estimate of the total cost of such a program or how she would pay for it. Approximately 4 million babies are born each year in the United States.
The US has had over 4 million births per year since 2000. The calculation is easy. In 2004, with 4,121,000 births, that would mean $20,605,000,000 dollars ... for just one year.
Where does Hillary plan to get that money? It's easy to talk about writing checks, but the federal budget already runs in the red, especially on entitlements. If we talk about spending even more money that we don't have, why stop at $5,000? John McCain wondered aloud in his blogger conference call whether $100,000 wouldn't sound more compassionate, as long as we didn't talk about how we plan to pay for the program.
This represents pandering politics at its worst. Want to get votes for an election? Promise to buy people off with free money! It takes the worst instincts of Norman Hsu to suggest yet another entitlement Ponzi scheme to get elected to office. The company Hillary keeps has started to rub off on her. Read Philip Klein for more.
UPDATE & BUMP, 3:40 PM: Teresa in the comments claims that Clinton's remarks were taken out of context. "Clinton was responding to a program suggested by Time Magazine in which the gov't would set up this program, but kids could only withdraw the money IF they served in the military or some other national service organization first."
Unfortunately, to take advantage of the 18 years of compounded interest Hillary thinks will pay for a college education or a new home, the government has to buy the bonds at birth -- which means the money gets outlaid right from the start, and we're paying $20 billion a year for this entitlement. Either that, or the government has to calculate the compounded interest for 18 years at the point of that decision and write a check -- which makes this an unfunded mandate, a liability that won't even get accounting until the lump sums start getting paid. Either way, it's an irresponsible fiscal disaster.
MEDIA WHORE!!!!!!
every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 “baby bond”
geez.....the same amount an illegal alien is/was to be “fined” to wipe away their criminal presence and initiate a “pathway” to citizenship...
Chicken in every pot!
There's really no other way to describe it.
I would rather tax the Hillary and the pro-aborts $5,000 per abortion and give it crisis-pregnancy centers.
Especially as she pandering to an all black audience. I’d cry “racism” but nobody’d believe me!
of course this will sound racist...but...
what groups will immediately procreate for the $5,000?
It won’t be the white middle class tax payers that are struggling now to pay the taxes to support all of these free giveaways!!!!!
My wife convinced me for much less. ; )
What if this $5,000 bounty on every newborn provides the incentive to reduce abortions?
How is this proposal like the tradition of savings?
Even RAT comments online confirm that this is a bonehead idea. Is she trying to buy votes on a fictitious proposal? Couldn't be...
No, Hillary's plan is clearly an attempt, advocation for out-of-wedlock births. This sort of idea/plan would only encourage and accelerate unprotected (non-marriage) minority sex.
Of course, it's totally un-PC for me to say that - but so be it.
It won’t.
Only Hillary could with a complete straight face offer $5000 for every birth while simultaneously taking money from the middle class to also pay for abortions for the poor.
Well only Hillary and Edwards and Obama and Biden and...
If all incoming freshman have this extra money, colleges and universities would merely raise their tuition that much quicker. In the end Hillary's giveaway would cost taxpayers and benefit the universities, not the students.
Is she going to pay for it out the goodness of her heart?
Gee, since every baby born in the US is a citizen, does this mean that Anchor Babies of illegal aliens would also qualify for the $5K?
I don’t think this is an original idea. I vaguely remember the same plan discussed up here in the Peoples Republic of California a few years ago although as I recall it was way less than $5000.00.
I’m all for it if she makes it retoactive to let’s say 1947.
I’m all for it if she makes it retoactive to let’s say 1947.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.