Posted on 09/28/2007 8:21:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I guess it’s back to eHarmony for Mr. Whineypants. BTW ladies....this is the guy your mama warned you about. (Cheap)
IronJack replied: Do a little research on public accommodation law. Think about it in terms of a "whites only" night. Or "no gays allowed" establishment.
Both statements are correct and not contradictory. The nightclub is not a governmental entity except on rare occasions when a government owns (or otherwise controls) the nightclub. Therefore, the nightclub is NOT able to deny constitutional rights, no matter what it does. However, the nightclub might violate discrimination laws relative to public accommodations.
A "whites only" policy at a nightclub would violate federal, state, and local public accommodation/anti-discrimination laws. However, a "no gays" policy in a nightclub might NOT violate the law in some areas. Indeed, that is one reason that homosexuals are lobbying to be included in federal anti-discrimination laws.
Does the public accommodation law apply to amusement parks?
Prices for whites: $X
Prices for blacks: $Y
How long do you think THAT establishment would stay open?
Yes, I would think an amusement park open to the public at large would constitute a public accommodation.
An affirmative action night? What a concept.
Apparently this guy Hollander has never gotten lucky at a bar. This ensures that he never will.
The SCOTUS has determined that giving preferences is allowable (affirmative action) in order to make up for past wrongs. Given the amount of time women generally have to wait for bathrooms at night clubs, I would say that “ladies nights” make up for it.
Can anyone else say “frivolous law suit?” This isn’t a case where a contempt charge should be filed. It could be settled with a simple statement from the judge: “Bailiff... Beat the crap out of the plaintiff!”
Mark
More likely, he's just completely unsuccessful on ladies nights, even though he's a lawyer, and probably has a Porsche or Mercedes. He can't "get lucky" so he wants to ruin the fun for everyone else... I'm sure once word gets out, the babes will be flocking to him!!!
Mark
"SURE you can".
free dixie,sw
Should I make assumptions about the man’s sexuality? Ladies’nights are set up to attract more men, because there are likely to be more women.
The "ladies' night" drink discounts are given to benefit men seeking women.
“Indeed. Methinks the plaintiff hasn’t really thought this through. Or else he’s gay.”
Either that or he is so frickin’ ugly that none of the women would give him the time of day.
sarc/off
Hmmm, excellent point. I own a bar in Texas and TABC will mot allow me to have a ladies night, (discriminates against men, stupidest thing I ever heard!) so I don't, but you are corect, preferences are legal. I might try it again.
"If they outlaw ladies' nights, how will we swinging guys meet the foxes with their big American breasts?"
exactly.
He’s GAYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
= Loser a**ho*e!
Where does he think that guys go to meet girls. LADIES NIGHTS!
Let the disbarment proceedings begin. Barratry is stil against the law.
The lawyer is a killer now. A dead killer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.