Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missile Intercept Proves Defense System Is Capable of Protecting the USA (Successful Intercept!)
earthtimes.org ^ | Sept 28 | Riki Ellison

Posted on 09/28/2007 2:55:07 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares

VANDENBERG AFB, Calif., Sept 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Riki Ellison, President of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (MDAA), http://www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org/, was at Vandenberg AFB to view the ground-based interceptor launch from the Ronald Reagan Missile Defense site on Vandenberg AFB, CA and got to witness the successful intercept by one of our nation's ground-based interceptor missile (GBI) deployed there against a threat-representative long range target missile launched from Kodiak, Alaska. Ellison's overall appraisal of the test was characterized as "an overwhelming success with the 7th intercept of this system gives our nation and our public great confidence that our military has the capability to protect our population, territory and homeland from long range missiles." Ellison said "The remarkable technical feat demonstrated today for the 7th time clearly gives our country security and reassurance that the current 23 Ground Based Interceptors deployed in California and Alaska can and will protect our public from long-range ballistic missiles.

(Excerpt) Read more at earthtimes.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: axis; gwot; reagan; sdi; starwars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Doing what the libs said couldn't be done.
1 posted on 09/28/2007 2:55:09 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Tricky. I’m all for it, but I wouldn’t depend on it.
2 posted on 09/28/2007 2:59:45 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
the current 23 Ground Based Interceptors deployed

We just need another 15,000 or so spread around the border to truly be safe from ICBMs.

3 posted on 09/28/2007 3:01:20 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Pro-active policy towards stopping rouge nations from obtaining missiles is the best way.

But failing that, if my city has an incoming warhead, and there is a 1 in 100 chance an interceptor will work.

Hell yeah, give me that chance!


4 posted on 09/28/2007 3:02:11 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

What worries me the most about the libs is that this missile technology may end up in the wrong hands if it were up to them. Libs and globalists are of the opinion that all technology should be shared.


5 posted on 09/28/2007 3:03:30 PM PDT by 353FMG (Government is the opiate of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I agree wholeheartedly.


6 posted on 09/28/2007 3:04:33 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

It was nice day for a missile shoot. From my perch on top of the mountain overlooking the pacific, you couldn’t ask for a better flight test.


7 posted on 09/28/2007 3:09:04 PM PDT by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Your results may vary. Void where prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

“We just need another 15,000 or so spread around the border to truly be safe from ICBMs.”

Nope. Even the Star Wars profiteers can’t say the Russians and Chinese can’t depoloy simple decoy systems to avoid “star wars”, let alone use cruise missiles.

It’s a scam, a repeat of the 1980’s boondoggle. But this time it’s to fight imaginary warheads from imaginery missiles.


8 posted on 09/28/2007 3:09:07 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Decoys don’t move like the real thing.


9 posted on 09/28/2007 3:12:27 PM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Outstanding intercept!

Of course, the lefties have recently switched their argument from “won’t work” over to “missile defenses placed in Poland would stop a Russian or Iranian attack on the U.S., thereby destabilizing the world.”


10 posted on 09/28/2007 3:16:27 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Decoys don’t move like the real thing.

Listen to me now, and believe me later when I tell you we have the ability to differentiate between a true RV threat and a decoy.

11 posted on 09/28/2007 3:17:50 PM PDT by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Your results may vary. Void where prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Funny thing is,

If it was ineffective,

Why do our enemies and less then allies get so upset about it! LOL


12 posted on 09/28/2007 3:24:07 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

BTTT!


13 posted on 09/28/2007 3:24:33 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

“Decoys don’t move like the real thing.”

Yeah, so the Russians and Chinese (probably us too) just toggle the warhead to look like all the others.

Done deal.


14 posted on 09/28/2007 3:26:14 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Southack

That’s typical of the left in this country. Anything that’s good and makes our country strong and safe is no good in their view. They hate this country with a desire to live under totalitarianism. I say this is money well spent. I thought communism died when the wall came down. Boy I was wrong.


15 posted on 09/28/2007 3:28:24 PM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

This is what the Clintons held back for their eight years in the White House...


16 posted on 09/28/2007 3:30:28 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Doing what the libs said couldn't be done.

A step forward and a move in the right direction via sensibility.

17 posted on 09/28/2007 3:31:59 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Too bad the Dims will cutthat program out in the budget.


18 posted on 09/28/2007 3:32:12 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Keyes/Paul '08 - When you can't get crazy enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
"Pro-active policy towards stopping rouge nations"

This is an inadvertently funny typo, since we are primarily interested in stopping the reds from getting us!

19 posted on 09/28/2007 3:34:57 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Why do our enemies and less then allies get so upset about it!

Because it is a loss of money transfer to them via the U.N. via our sovereign concerns.

20 posted on 09/28/2007 3:35:36 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson