Posted on 09/26/2007 5:49:53 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
Thompson's refusal to back a nationwide ban on gay marriage has irritated potential supporters.
Fred Thompson is failing to meet expectations that he would rally widespread support from Christian conservatives, and he almost certainly will not receive a joint endorsement from the loose coalition of "pro-family" organizations, according to leaders of the movement.
Many religious conservatives, faced with a Republican primary top tier that lacked a true kindred spirit, initially looked to Thompson as a savior. But the former Tennessee senator has disappointed or just not sufficiently impressed the faith community since his formal campaign launch earlier this month.
While Christian conservatives once seemed willing to readily give Thompson the benefit of the doubt earlier this summer, when questions were raised about his lobbying for a pro-abortion-rights group, they are not willing to turn the other cheek anymore.
Even some on the religious right who remain sympathetic to Thompson are unhappy about his refusal to back a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and were unpleasantly surprised by his confession that he doesn’t belong to or attend any church and won’t talk about his faith.
It was Thompson’s refusal to discuss his faith that is likely to deny him any unified backing from the organizations that comprise the Arlington Group, the umbrella coalition of almost every major social conservative group in the GOP constellation.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
ditto.
This is the same rehashed storyline from last week and the week before. So far, its had zero effect on Fred`s campaign. Doubt that will change.
You Romneyites and Duncanista`s are really desperate.
I regretted it the moment I clicked “post.” I apologize.
I should have said:
Well, since it’s YOU, you’re forgiven. Heehee
A rational question they won’t honestly answer.
how many people are going to vote for a candidate simply due to their stance on gay marriage?
you are speaking out of vapor not legal facts.
Legislators passed laws and amendments long before the citizens.
We DO have the numbers.
You are dead wrong and your nit picking BS just points out the fact there is HUGE public support to protect marrige.
If this is in fact the official Fred Thompson position rather than some homosexual RINO talking point then Thompson has a problem he had better fix.
Thompson has a law degree. Even a first year lawyer knows the Federalism argument pushd by the effete elites is complete hogwash to protect their own Senator Craigs.
the marriage issue is a litmust test the same way the second amendment is a litmus test.
It is an indicator of attitude on multiple issues.
If we can not trust Thompson on this simple legal fact, then we can not trust him on other issues.
It is also akin to immigration as a litmus test on border security.
I'll ditto that. The man looks (and acts) like a male version of a stepford wife. LOL!
Don't think your prediction is particularly likely.
As far as the original article goes, it sounds like a hit piece trying to peel evangelicals off of the GOP bandwagon, much as Rahm Emmanuel's strategy of sending in "conservative-lite" Democrats into swing districts helped the Dems win Congress last election.
Full Disclosure: I don't listen to Bauer, the Moral Majority, or Dobson when choosing who to vote for.
Cheers!
You know, I get the exact same vibes from him as I do from Clinton and Gingrich.
Well, that wouldn’t surprise me.
Hey, I support Dobson’s right to peacefully assemble with like minded people to advocate in favor of a certain agenda. He has as much right as any atheist, libertarian, conservative or liberal to petition the government. As much as that annoys some people that christians have a say in the process.
As a social conservative I share much in common with the agenda he advocates on behalf of.
But I find his judgement in politics to be suspect after his staunch defense of Miers. And i find his backhanded cheap assault on Thompson to be beneath him. he doesn’t have to like him, but the talking points he gave didn’t come from his own lips. Nor did he have the courage to stand up and oppose him to his face. Instead he sends this E-Mail he KNEW, he’s a big boy after all, he KNEW would be leaked. Why? Because if Thompson ends up the nominee he has to save face and he’ll want a seat at the table.
In the end, I’ve looked at the field. Rudy and Romney are Liberals. McCain spits on conservatives. Newt has too much baggage, lack of self control and judgement, and has caved on healthcare and the environment. Hunter isn’t registering in the polls. that leaves thompson. A good enough conservative record I can support without feeling nauseated.
So Dobson can hold the opinion he wishes. And if it’s true he has joined with newt, best of luck. But this social conservative will not vote for newt anymore then I would Rudy, McCain, or Romney. I have my guy and the attack pieces aren’t making a dent. The only way to dent my suport is to provide a stronger conservative that can beat Rudy. Haven’t seen one on the horizon.
Not this evangelical.
McCain said that?? Whoa!
Right, they don't exist. So please stop the song and dance. I know as well as you do how the vast majority of Americans aren't even sure homosexual behavior should be legal. Much less the 60-70% who believe that marriage between two men or two women should /never/ be legal.
So, yeah, stick your fingers in your ears and go nah-nah-nah all you want, but the constitution is not the place to legislate.
If this is in fact the official Fred Thompson position rather than some homosexual RINO talking point then Thompson has a problem he had better fix.
Right, let's see... How many top tier candidates support the marriage amendment, not just through campaign press releases, but through actual action. Answer: None.
What the HECK is he thinking?
Somehow, I doubt very much that Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Paine, John Hancock, James Madison, et al, went around talking about their personal relationships with Jesus. Frankly, Mr. Leland, I also doubt seriously that they were not in attendance at many great parties with the day's equivalent of rock 'n roll and booze, etc. The question was, is, and will always be: Does the man behave honorably toward his fellows? For Pete's sake, evalengelicals -- lighten up!!!
There is nothing new under the sun.
What is it with you? You don’t get to decide litmus tests for everyone else.
“As far as know one prominant evanglical leader, Dobson, has come out against Thompson. And I lost a lot of respect for Dobson on that. If he doesn’t like Thompson then just talk up the guy he does like. Climbing into the mud slinging political pig sty is no place for a Christian.”
I agree. It is interesting that these Christians are coming out with negative things to say about the candidate they WON”T support insead of coming out with positive things to say about the one they WILL support. Think maybe they don’t know who to support. Maybe this little questionnaire would help them find out who best matches their opinions on several issues instead of just the gay marriage issue. It is a pretty good “pick a candidate” questionnaire. :)
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.