Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Posted on 09/25/2007 6:05:41 PM PDT by BKerr
Washington (The Weekly Standard) Vol. 013, Issue 03 - 10/1/2007 - David Holden is a savvy guy. He doesn't consider himself a political junkie, but he has been closely following the presidential campaign as it unfolds around him. Holden runs Hair Biz, a salon at 4 N. Main Street in Concord, New Hampshire. Hillary Clinton's campaign office is two blocks up, and his location, as luck would have it, puts him just a few doors down from John Edwards's headquarters.
Hair salon . . . John Edwards . . . Did I mention that Holden is a savvy guy?
In June, Holden challenged 2008 presidential candidates to come to Hair Biz for a $400 haircut. The money would go towards research on autism--Holden's adopted son Costica suffers from the developmental disability.
I met Holden at his shop earlier this month as I chased a rumor that John McCain might show up for a trim. The rumors were unfounded, and McCain had his hair cut down the street for $16. Not one of the candidates has taken Holden up on the challenge. Still, he hasn't given up hope.
"I hear that Fred Thomas is getting in."
Fred Thomas. Fred Thompson. It doesn't matter, as long as he shows up for a haircut.
Even before he announced his candidacy September 5 on The Tonight Show, the Washington press corps was deeply skeptical about a Thompson run. The emerging conventional wisdom was that voters would judge harshly the turmoil and turnover that marked his pre-campaign efforts and that such trouble--a sure sign of more to come--would cripple his campaign. It was an understandable conclusion. After all, reporters in Washington had spent months covering Thompson's staff changes and fundraising woes. There had been real problems with his early efforts.
But many voters, even the ones who live amidst the everyday swirl of early primary politicking, simply aren't paying much attention. A national Rasmussen poll conducted last week found that 56 percent of likely voters believe that the 2008 campaign has thus far been "annoying and a waste of time." And 72 percent would support measures to limit campaigning to the calendar year before Election Day.
Thompson has gotten additional media scrutiny since he announced, and the national press coverage of his first three weeks as a candidate has been even more negative than it was during what he calls "the preseason." George Will called the entry a "belly flop." New York Times columnist Gail Collins wrote: "When it comes to overhyped underperformers, Fred Thompson's entry into the presidential race was right up there with Britney Spears at the MTV awards." Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post complained: "Thompson's dialogue so far consists of folksy platitudes and broad pronouncements, unobjectionable yet unenlightening."
Thompson has been criticized for his choice of footwear, for losing too much weight, and for his lack of enthusiasm about meeting the Butter Princess at the Iowa State Fair. He has been chided for his failure to offer specifics on his plans for entitlement reform, the alternative minimum tax, and Iraq.
"I get the sense from the national press corps that our announcement tour would have been a failure unless Fred walked on water onto the stage where he levitated 10 feet in the air doing somersaults while delivering his remarks without notes," says Todd Harris, the campaign's communications director.
What explains this hostility? One factor is almost certainly Thompson's decision to work around--not through--the mainstream media in Washington. He first hinted at his candidacy in an interview with the Fox News Channel. He spent time with reporters from THE WEEKLY STANDARD and National Review. He posted commentaries on conservative blogs and brief video editorials on his own website. Nothing generates hostility from reporters so much as ignoring or dismissing them. Just ask Dick Cheney.
But some of the criticisms are valid, and they do not come only from the national media. Lee Bandy, the influential columnist at the State in Columbia, South Carolina, wrote that Thompson's debut "wasn't very impressive" and that his upcoming debate performances could reveal that he is "not ready for prime time."
Even some Thompson supporters worry that his speeches lack focus and strike audiences as rhetorical wandering. And they are concerned that his long layoff from active campaigning and his late entry will mean that reporters will harp on him, playing his knock-the-dust-off stumbles as major campaign gaffes.
This week, Thompson intends to sharpen the differences he has with two of his rivals--Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani--by asking a simple question: Where were you during the 1994 Republican Revolution? Thompson, who first won election to the Senate that year, will portray himself as a "consistent conservative" who supported the small-government principles of the Contract With America then and supports them today. The obvious conclusion: While Thompson was campaigning as a proud conservative in Tennessee, Romney was running for the Senate in Massachusetts as a liberal Republican who distanced himself from Reaganomics. Giuliani was endorsing the Democratic governor of New York and liberal icon Mario Cuomo for reelection.
Perhaps the most interesting thing about the Thompson campaign so far is this: Despite his late entry, poor fundraising, and staff disorder, and despite the negative press, the former Tennessee senator, three weeks into his campaign, must be considered not only a top-tier candidate but almost a co-frontrunner for the Republican nomination. The Rasmussen poll at the end of last week actually found him tied with Giuliani; the most recent Gallup poll gives Giuliani an 8-point lead, Reuters/Zogby has Giuliani up 2, and CNN has the former mayor up one.
Call it a nice Fred Thomas post-announcement bump.
Stephen F. Hayes is a senior writer at THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
So far, all the criticism and all the attacks on Fred haven’t stopped his campaign from moving forward.
For someone whose been out of politics for five years, I think Fred is doing a good job as he advances into the heart of the GOP primary season.
Those who say Fred will crash and burn, are gonna be mighty disappointed when he wins the nomination.
Fred08!
I can’t believe it’s even an primary. Let’s see, we have a democrat with an R next to his name named Rudy; a liberal “turned conservative” named Mitt; a war hero that is another Jorge W. Bush if elected (also best friends with Ted Kennedy) named McCain; or, you can have a true, small-government conservative that the media can’t touch named Fred Thompson. To me it’s a no-brainer.
Whenever you see the MSM harping on something like this, it’s because they’re scared. Despite all their alleged erudition, in matters like these their thinking is as sophisticated (and transparent) as that of a third grader.
Fred is the most exciting GOP candidate to come along since Reagan, the MSM know it, and they’re scared to death of it.
It’s the same phenomenon we see with regard to liberalism and religion. They applaud any and all faiths, save one, which they hate with a vitriolic fervor. Why? Because it’s the one that scares them and their master. It’s the real thing and they recognize the power even if they won’t admit it.
MM (in TX)
Look, we've been over this numerous times.
The fact is Fred's smouldering fury posed a mortal threat to the Butter Princess. Iowa State Fair officials begged Fred, begged him!, to stay away from the Butter Princess lest he render her but a golden puddle of oily goo.
Agreed.
As far as conservatism goes, Fred is the real deal. He's pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-national defense, pro-limited govt, pro-federalist, pro-tax reform, pro-gun, pro-family, pro-life, pro-private property rights, pro-capitalism, pro-trade, pro-business, pro-entitlement reform, secured borders, anti-amnesty, anti-special rights, pro-freedom, and-pro America. Fred wants to preserve and strengthen American sovereignty, kill the Islamofascists and win the WOT.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
I admit...from the beginning I was a FredHead! I watched Senator Thompson during the days of the Clinton fundraising scandals. Funny how life turns around. I think Senator Thompson will mop the floor with Hitleeery...and her little husband too!!!
so this is how the MSM will try and rescue they NYC liberals. MEME Thompson as a mere boing.
“To me it’s a no-brainer.....”
Fred represents what all of Washington DC has been trying to run away from for the last 10-15 years...he’s got the East Coast establishment tied in knots..and the Beltway Boys jibbering in fear the heartland has awoken....
This little old lady's got to jump up and yell "BINGO" at that statement!
“What explains this hostility? One factor is almost certainly Thompson’s decision to work around—not through—the mainstream media in Washington.”
“This little old lady’s got to jump up and yell “BINGO” at that statement!”
This little old lady too! Decided to pass this on. It is a pick a candidate questionnaire a friend sent to me. I would have had some of the questions worded a little differently, and perhaps more questions and more answer choices, but think it is pretty good. Thompson and Hunter came out on top for me. Love them both! Going to be hard to pick.:)
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
Better worry about the VP nomination if freddie gets the nod.
Articles on Yahoo have the same standing as “the Onion”
They can’t say anything good about Thompson because A) they don’t have a legal or philosophical background from which to explain his federalist principles, B) if some do have such a background they do not have the talent to get a headline with the subject matter C) they can’t be seen going beyond their place in the pecking order of the Washington press syndicate and D) they have too much invested in the other ‘top tier’ candidates to change horses in the middle of a stream.
They are irritated with Thompson upsetting their forecast. So irritated in fact they can’t quote reality in the most recent Rasmussen poll as this writer has failed to do. The writer could have easily have referenced today’s and other Rasmussen polls showing Thompson with a significant lead over Guiliani. That he didn’t even though he had the opportunity shows he is in denial or wants to avoid upsetting his press comrades who are in denial.
FRed bump.
Thanks for the link!
I also like Duncan Hunter, and were Fred not in, he’d be my candidate. I would love our 2008 ticket to be Thompson/Hunter.
Better worry about the VP nomination if freddie gets the nod.
I’m not worried.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.