To: The South Texan
Your guess was correct. Here are the 16 who voted against.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll895.xml
—— NAYS 16 -—
Abercrombie
Baldwin
Bartlett (MD)
Blumenauer
Conyers
Ellison
Flake
Gilchrest
Hinchey
Lee
McDermott
Miller, George
Moore (WI)
Olver
Paul
Stark
7 posted on
09/25/2007 11:21:00 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: MNJohnnie
Ron Paul, the conscience of the House.
To: MNJohnnie
McDermott is surely no surprise.
11 posted on
09/25/2007 11:26:55 AM PDT by
puroresu
(Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations.)
To: MNJohnnie
Ellison. That figures....
14 posted on
09/25/2007 11:31:21 AM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Tracking The Flyin' Imams Since 11/20/06)
To: MNJohnnie
I knew John Conyers (AhyphenA-Detroit) was one of those who would vote against something like this even before I scrolled down to the list. America hating racist Conyers can't even support the bill of another America hater like Lantos.
Of course his wife, Moronica, who sits on the Detroit City Council proposed legislation making Detroit a sanctuary city for illegal aliens. It passed. Detroit continues its slide into 4th world status.
15 posted on
09/25/2007 11:37:58 AM PDT by
RushLake
(Democrats/MSM have never met a terrorist they didn't like.)
To: MNJohnnie
Well now, you just answered my question.
I had a thread here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1901938/posts
Where I linked our GOP candidates coming out and denouncing Ahmadinejad.
But I could not find a statement from Paul or Huckabee.
I see why I couldn’t find one from Paul, thanks to your post.
25 posted on
09/25/2007 12:38:31 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
To: MNJohnnie; The South Texan; ejonesie22; BlackElk; dighton; lormand; Petronski
Any takers that one GOP presidential candidates might be one of the 16?*********************************
NAYS 16 -
Paul
Right on the money. Not surprising.
Disgusting, but not at all surprising.
40 posted on
09/25/2007 12:55:14 PM PDT by
Allegra
(The Surge Works While the Democrats "Betray Us.")
To: MNJohnnie
Of course.. Ron Paul voted against it.. why am I not surprised.
42 posted on
09/25/2007 12:56:12 PM PDT by
mnehring
(!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
To: MNJohnnie
Funny how we can profile a group’s actions in Congress and vote them out of office based on their actions BUT - we can’t seem to profile middle eastern Muslim males between 18-35 and act on the group’s actions through our Justice Department or intelligence agencies.
The good news is we can vote these people out and use such simple but powerful analytics to vote in politicians whom will change our intelligence agencies and Justice Department. Also, give me the canditates that consistently voted against illegal invasion from day one. Won’t that be a much safer country? Wow, I must be a genius or something. (sarc off)
51 posted on
09/25/2007 1:01:14 PM PDT by
quant5
To: MNJohnnie
Why would Rep. Flake vote against this? The rest are not a surprise except for Rep. Baldwin! Um...they execute homosexuals in Islamic countries, so why did you vote this way, Rep. Baldwin?
To: jmeagan
80 posted on
09/25/2007 1:20:46 PM PDT by
mnehring
(!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
To: Lil'freeper; sauropod
NAYS 16 - Abercrombie
Baldwin
Bartlett (MD)
Blumenauer
Conyers
Ellison
Flake
Gilchrest
Hinchey
Lee
McDermott
Miller, George
Moore (WI)
Olver
Paul
Stark Figures Maryland would be well represented.
122 posted on
09/25/2007 2:07:41 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: MNJohnnie
Lee and Stark the U.S. hating commies of the SF bay area, who would have thunk.
To: MNJohnnie
Ellison is the Muslim, right? Go figure.
145 posted on
09/25/2007 2:36:21 PM PDT by
W04Man
(I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
To: MNJohnnie
Every one of them should be expelled from office.
146 posted on
09/25/2007 2:37:06 PM PDT by
rdl6989
To: MNJohnnie
Hinchey - FiguresHey Hinchey:
To: MNJohnnie; The South Texan
Who were the 16 that voted against it. Any takers that one GOP presidential candidates might be one of the 16?Your guess was correct. Here are the 16 who voted against.
I was wondering this, too. The fools, too clever by half.
Yeah, color me shocked, Mr. Paul voted nay.
270 posted on
09/25/2007 4:40:46 PM PDT by
fortunecookie
(Finally catching up with posting...)
To: MNJohnnie
Tammy Baldwin must either have a supreme case of denial or be a self-loathing lesbian.
To: MNJohnnie; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; tgslTakoma; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ...
Bartlett?????!!!!
That’s a surprise.
297 posted on
09/25/2007 4:52:59 PM PDT by
sauropod
(You can’t spell crap without the AP in it.)
To: MNJohnnie
I can't say for absolute certain, but I believe that Ron Paul is the only so-called Republican on that list of House members who voted nay on that bill.
Any conservative Republican who will still vote for Ron Paul after this latest demonstration of his moonbattish lunacy deserves exactly what he or she will get for casting that vote.
Which is absolutely nothing, because Paul has nothing but nothing to offer his cultish followers except more nothing.
313 posted on
09/25/2007 5:03:48 PM PDT by
epow
To: MNJohnnie
Looks like Jeff Flake and Roscoe Bartlett (my congressman) voted against as well. Jeff Flake I can understand; he’s a libertarian sort. But what the he**’s up with Roscoe?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson