Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Less than half of military votes overseas counted
Stars and Stripes ^ | Sept 25, 2007 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 09/25/2007 6:28:24 AM PDT by RDTF

Election commission: 57,000 ballots were cast in ’06

WASHINGTON — Overseas military voters had less than half of their votes counted in last year’s congressional elections, according to data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission on Monday.

“One thing is clear: At every level of government, we need to do a better job,” said Donetta Davidson, chair of the commission. “We must make sure all eligible voters are getting their opportunities.”

The figures, released at the commission’s annual conference on ways to improve and troubleshoot the absentee voting process, showed that only about 992,000 of the nearly 6 million eligible overseas citizens requested ballots for the 2006 general election.

That included about 119,000 military personnel stationed outside the United States. Of those, only about 57,000 — less than 48 percent — had their votes successfully cast or counted.

EAC officials said that’s roughly the same percentage that were counted for expatriates and domestic military filing absentee ballots. The major failures were on the ballot delivery side, with about 72 percent of those who failed to vote never receiving any of their requested election materials.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: absenteeballots; countallthevotes; howtostealanelection; militaryvotes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Puppage

You know that <>%? I call it the cheat %. I don’t know if 1-2% is high enough though. We probably need to factor in at least 10% to win IMO.


21 posted on 09/25/2007 6:52:59 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

that has always been the lefties policy...create voter apathy through televised and printed propoganda...the problem is there are conservative voter who buy into this crap....it is a civic duty to vote, the larger the turnout, the more conservatives win, and the libs know it..


22 posted on 09/25/2007 6:54:19 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

You know that <>%? I call it the cheat %. I don’t know if 1-2% is high enough though. We probably need to factor in at least 10% to win IMO.


23 posted on 09/25/2007 6:54:57 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

“When are the Republicans going to wake up to vote fraud on an official basis? The last two national elections were examples of fraud beyond belief in at least 6 states.”
__________________________________________________________

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet! Just wait till the DNC’s “50 State Strategy” kicks in during the ‘08 Presidential election. All the aggrieved (the dis-infranchised), the lawyers, the judges and the media whores are in place, on the payroll and waiting their orders.


24 posted on 09/25/2007 6:55:25 AM PDT by Roccus (Hillary........brought to you by the PRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: krb
Obviously, if any ballot issue is closer than the number of outstanding absentee ballots, they are counted.
25 posted on 09/25/2007 6:56:52 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

So our military personnel are fighting and dying so that Iraqis can vote, while our government takes away the right of those soldiers, sailors, and Marines to vote in U.S. elections by its bureaucratic sloppiness and laziness? This is an outrage, and I want to hear it addressed by candidates running for the GOP nomination.


26 posted on 09/25/2007 6:57:32 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
margins of victory matter

In Presidental elections, margins of victory are misleading because of the Electoral College.

If we went to a congressional district based distribution of Electoral Votes (the Nebraska/Maine model,) or to a purely popular vote model, then people, for example Republican voters in California, would be more likely to get out to vote even though they know that their state will go the other way.

As it stands now, conservatives in many parts of California stay home, so the margin of victory appears larger than it might otherwise have been if everybody voted.

27 posted on 09/25/2007 7:05:19 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Save even more money, count only half of all votes.


28 posted on 09/25/2007 7:15:49 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

How about someone flying their jet overseas and flying the votes back? I am totally disgusted by this, and I believe it was done deliberately.


29 posted on 09/25/2007 7:22:26 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

There were reports that the Democrats in 2004 deliberately spun out the court challenges to the ballot in Ohio before the election (having to do with Nader’s name being included) so that overseas military wouldn’t have time to get the final version of the ballot and vote.


30 posted on 09/25/2007 7:23:35 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
If you have 5,000 absentee ballots in a stack, and one candidate is ahead by 6,000 votes, counting the absentee ballots will not change the outcome of the election, and cost the taxpayers money.

I've heard this claim before, but I don't believe it. How often does an absentee ballot have just ONE contest? So a candidate is ahead by 5,000 votes. What about the other races? What about the bond issues? What about the propositions?

31 posted on 09/25/2007 7:29:07 AM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (I made a prank call...pretended I was a mime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

Close? Wasnt the vote squeaky close almost everywhere that demokkkrats won? Say, virginia?


32 posted on 09/25/2007 7:40:49 AM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
That definitely cost the Senate, maybe the House too.

Do you have some particular races in mind? Assuming the uncounted ballots break 3 to 1 Republican that is only a net change of less than 30,000 votes spread across 435 Congressional races and 30+ Senate races.

I doubt these uncounted ballots would have had any major impact on the 2006 election results but they should be counted nevertheless.

33 posted on 09/25/2007 7:41:40 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Governor Rendell of PA wouldn’t extend the deadline after the PA military ballots were sent out late, and then had to be forced to by a lawsuit.


34 posted on 09/25/2007 7:51:13 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ( America: “...the most benign hegemon in history.” —Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

During the Florduh issue with Gore my dad, who votes out of state, was told by the county voting office that they don’t even bother to open the mailed in ballots because they claim they didn’t amount to much. No kidding, didn’t even bother to open them.


35 posted on 09/25/2007 7:59:48 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

“Another leftist policy.”

Not to mention the vote count is given on the news and if all the votes are not counted then we get the problem of one candidate claiming to have won by more of a majority than they actually did.


36 posted on 09/25/2007 8:01:35 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

...more good news for the Democrat Party.


37 posted on 09/25/2007 8:02:39 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

You don’t vote Democrat, so **** off....


38 posted on 09/25/2007 8:07:35 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Labor intensive? Because you haver to pnen a ballot and stick the punch card into a machine? So what ? Count these ballots first, along with the early ballots. I am thinking of ballots from overseas military: let them to to the head of the line.


39 posted on 09/25/2007 8:08:15 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

What I want to know, understand, is how the public can put pressure on some election commission , federal agency, to get all , all of our military ballots counted. What can we do to help this to occur before 2008? Any websites, any Gop rep who is looking into this to solve this?


40 posted on 09/25/2007 11:08:22 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson