Attacking a Newspaper Ad Doesn't Save a Single Soldier (What do you tink of Susan Estrich's Babble?)

FoxNews ^ | Susan Estrich

[SandRat]

Excuse me, but what is the Democratic-lead Senate doing wasting its time, and ours, debating and voting about the wording of a newspaper ad?

[FormerACLUmember]

Sometimes you CAN tell a book by its cover:

[donnab]

A mere look at Susan could put down an entire terrorist group....should use her.

[an amused spectator]

Susan personally believes that U.S. Americans are unable to do so because some people out there in our nation don’t have maps...

[sageb1]

The Dems are all saying the same thing. Why are we debating an ad instead of the war?

Well, heck, I thought it was a great diversion from the war debate, which has been going on longer than the war itself.

[jennyjenny]

They never want to debate when they know they can’t win.

[L98Fiero]

“Excuse me, but what is the Democratic-lead Senate doing wasting its time, and ours, debating and voting about the wording of a newspaper ad?”

Covering their political @$$.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

PS - where is that post someone had about how ugly SE was? One of the funniest posts ever. Wish I could find it.

[RichInOC]

Neither does libeling a general, Susan. And your point was...?

[Enchante]

Blah, blah..... Susan Ostrich once again sounding like the useless hack she is..... Susan, if you don't comprehend why that loathsome ad by the LEADING puppet-master of the Democrat Party has to be addressed and not ignored, then you do NOT support the troops and you are part of the sneering, smearing contemptible left that prefers to weaken and undermine America.

btw, are these really two different book titles in her bio:

“Soulless,” "The Case for Hillary Clinton"

I thought maybe it was just one book:

"Soulless: The Case for Hillary Clinton"

[ozzymandus]

Detestable commie skank. She was trashing the clintons for a while, but she quickly got back in step with the RATS. Mostly she writes about stale femi-nazi boilerplate crap from the 70’s.

[nyyankeefan]

estrich is butt ugly ~ both on the inside and out!!!

I cannot believe that she was once married...what guy (other than a blind lib/dem) would want her to sidle up to him!!!

[VR-21]

Sounds like the latest version of “censure, and move on.”

[RichInOC]

I will say that when her last book, "Soulless", came out with a cover picture of her parodying Ann Coulter's cover shot for "Godless", and it came to FR's attention, I noted:

"Susan, the entire point of dolling up for the cover photo is to make the reader want to read the book, not stagger out of the bookstore screaming in pain, trying to hold his/her melting eyes in."

[hoyaloya]

Funny Democrats should ponder this question at all.

After all, I hardly think providing public support and agreement with the enemy’s political positions and taking every opportunity to say our soldiers might as well give up because they’re losing is going to save any American soldiers’ lives.

[SandRat]

You found the photo I was looking for

Looks just like her.

[MNJohnnie]

Published the newspaper ad will kill dozens of our soldiers since it give propaganda aid to our enemies and encourages them to keep fighting.

[Doogle]

"squakkk,squaksquak,squak.....squak-squak,squaksquaksqauk"

[rottndog]

They never want to debate when they know they can’t win.

Exactly. Dumbocrats know they've been bit@# slapped with this ad, and it stings....so now they have to run away by changing the subject.