Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland's Highest Court Upholds State Law Favoring Traditional Marriage
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | September 18, 2007

Posted on 09/22/2007 8:31:38 PM PDT by monomaniac

Maryland's Highest Court Upholds State Law Favoring Traditional Marriage

ANNAPOLIS, September 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 decision, upheld the state's marriage law, which says "only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this state." In January 2006 the circuit court for Baltimore City struck down the marriage law (Family Law Article 2-201) as discriminatory on the basis of sex, in violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, in the case of Conaway v. Deane.

Maryland's highest court reversed the circuit court, ruling today that the marriage law did not violate the state Equal Rights Amendment, did not discriminate on the basis of sex and that the state has an interest in fostering procreation and the traditional family. The court's opinion stated: "In light of the fundamental nature of procreation, and the importance placed on it by the Supreme Court, safeguarding an environment most conducive to the stable propagation and continuance of the human race is a legitimate government interest."

When the case was appealed, Liberty Counsel filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Association of Maryland Families, urging the state's highest court to uphold the marriage law. Liberty Counsel's brief argued that the marriage law does not discriminate on the basis of sex.

The Supreme Court established decades ago that marriage is a fundamental right, but it is not a standard-less right to marry whomsoever one chooses. It is only the right for one man and one woman to create a legal union without undue interference from the government. Preserving marriage as the union of one man and one woman furthers the state's interest in maintaining an institution that forms the very foundation of society.

Mathew D. Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law, commented: "Marriage between one man and one woman is rooted in American history and forms the foundation for stable families and prosperous communities. The Maryland court has sided with common sense and objective reality."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: discrimination; family; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; marriage; maryland; procreation; profamily; ruling; samesexmarriage; sodomy

1 posted on 09/22/2007 8:31:41 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

2 posted on 09/22/2007 8:34:41 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Seems we still have some Judges, in our nation, who have common sense.


3 posted on 09/22/2007 8:36:02 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
"....safeguarding an environment most conducive to the stable propagation and continuance of the human race is a legitimate government interest."

Yes, I suppose it is.

4 posted on 09/22/2007 8:43:03 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
Seems we still have some Judges, in our nation, who have common sense.

The scary part is that the vote was 4 - 3.

5 posted on 09/22/2007 8:43:55 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Maryland is a liberal state, and I was expecting their decision would be to allow homosexual marriage.

Well, the court battles continue in California, and Iowa, and a couple other states.

Now that the court has ruled in Maryland, look for a full court press in the Democratic legislature to pass a law allowing homosexual marraige. It could happen, and now that they know the courts won’t do it for them in Maryland, the legislature will now be pressured.


6 posted on 09/22/2007 9:28:10 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

Maryland “Freak State” PING!

LifeSite’s take on the marriage ruling.


7 posted on 09/23/2007 1:40:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Having some knowledge of this Ct's prior rulings in other areas of law, I would have bet the farm that they would rule the opposite way...

Dog's and Cats, living together...mass hysteria!!!

8 posted on 09/24/2007 2:01:46 PM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson