 |
UK Ping list - if you would like on or off, freepmail me. |
Posted on 09/22/2007 10:18:31 AM PDT by UKrepublican
Our soldiers ‘deserve US-style parades’
British soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan should be welcomed home as heroes and honoured with parades in their local towns, General Sir Richard Dannatt, head of the Army, said yesterday.
Looking enviously at the treatment of returning troops in the United States, where ticker-tape parades and bands are commonplace, General Dannatt said he was worried that there was a widening gulf between the members of the Armed Forces and the public. He blamed it partly on the “demonstrably unpopular war in Iraq” and, by association, what was “deemed to be an unpopular war in Afghanistan”.
General Dannatt urged councils to consider arranging parades for returning regiments based in their areas, and called on football clubs to offer free tickets to soldiers who had spent six months in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Parades in their home towns organised by local councils would make them “feel good”, he said. He made his appeal during a speech on the future of the Army at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
General Dannatt said: “We don’t ask for sympathy when we are doing what we are paid to do. But we do what we do in the nation’s name. They are not supermen, but soldiers need to know that they are respected for their acts of selflessness and courage . . . and for their commitment.”
The general, who is Chief of the General Staff, has made previous public pronouncements about the importance of the so-called military covenant between the Armed Forces and the Government and nation they serve. But yesterday he went farther. “In the United States, appreciation of the Armed Forces is nothing short of outstanding and I would like to see some of that reflected here,” he said.
When the troops returned home from the Falklands conflict in 1982, thousands of people lined the harbour at Portsmouth to welcome them; and victory parades were held in London after the Falklands campaign and after the 1991 Gulf War.
“Soldiers are genuinely concerned when they come back from Iraq to hear the population that sent them being occasionally dismissive. We are in danger of sapping at our volunteer Army’s willingness to serve in such an atmosphere again,” he said.
The head of the Army fully acknowledged that the public’s perception of the two campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan was unfavourable. But the operation in Afghanistan, he said, was “misunderstood”. It was wrong to describe it as Britain’s “fourth war” there � after the wars of 1839, 1878 and 1919. “We’re there at the Afghan Government’s request to assist them in building security, economic stability and the rule of law,” he said.
He then revealed that, until now, the British military had avoided taking on the opium growers in southern Afghanistan because of the risk of alienating the Afghan farmers whose livelihoods depended on their poppy crops. Had the troops eradicated the poppy fields from the start, it would have caused “an own goal”, giving the Taleban a propaganda opportunity.
However, General Dannatt said that next year the intention was “to bear down on the poppy harvest”.
He made no reference to possible future troop cuts in Iraq, other than to say that all the Service chiefs had now given their advice to the Government on appropriate levels, in anticipation of the expected statement on Iraq by Gordon Brown next month.
General Dannatt said that significant progress had been made in southern Iraq, with three of the four provinces already handed over to Iraqi security control, and he denied that the 500 British troops withdrawn from the Basra Palace base this month had been forced out. “To say that we were bombed out of Basra is completely wrong,” he said.
He added: “We have not lost a single significant tactical engagement, and the nation should take great pride in what has been achieved.”
| |
UK Ping list - if you would like on or off, freepmail me. |
PING
Couldn’t agree more!
I agree with you, all our troops, both departing for the zone and returning home, should be so honored no matter what national flag they wore on their uniform. They are fighting for FREEDOM. No less now than the Vets of WWI & WWII did.
Too bad they can’t bring them on over here. We are grateful for what they do and I’d love to see them honored for it.
For the Brit troopers I’d cheer “well done lads” and mean it. All these volunteer Coalition troops are heroes.
Regards.
This implies there is NO place in all of England where troops could be paraded to acclaim. It that nation really so homogeneous?
Granted, running them through Red Ken’s London wouldn’t be a good idea. What with gun control, it would be a tremendous gunfight between them and “Asian” youth, armed to the teeth. They would think they were still in Afghanistan, being attacked by Pakistanis. Well, no, they would be in London, but they would still be attacked by Pakistanis.
However, there must be large parts of England where crowds would turn out to heap praise on their warriors.
I agree, but to be honest I’d prefer it if the govt bought some A10’s for close air support in Afghanistan...
Aye Mac, you're right. They are a comfort when your in a strange neighborhood far from home.
Regards
“Too bad they can’t bring them on over here. We are grateful for what they do and I’d love to see them honored for it”.
AMEN to that. This American is very thankful not only for my homegrown heros, but also those of my “cousins” from across the pond.
Also thankful for my Aussie heros down under!!
...and any others I have regretfully missed - you are in our debt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.