Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Rent is throwing your money away. Best to buy your house and pay it off quickly. Once it is paid off, you can live in a nice house for a couple hundred a month for the taxes.


50 posted on 09/22/2007 12:28:54 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan

Bullsh*t!!! You show me anywhere in the United States were you can have a house payment of under five-hundred a month and I’ll show you a three-legged as@hole.


53 posted on 09/22/2007 12:33:28 AM PDT by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan

Well I live in San Diego and moved here in late 2005 and buying a house upon moving would have been a disaster. So basically it’s all local.

With the foreclosures, NODs, NOTs and REOs that are out there, I almost feel like I’d still be a sucker to buy so I am sitting it out. At some point the banks will be forced by regulators to start unloading homes. My best guess, which ticks off the wife is to hold off buying until 2009.


59 posted on 09/22/2007 12:41:47 AM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan

If you buy a $100,000 home for cash, and it doubles in value after 10 years, you made $200,000. You tied up $100,000 and made $100,000. Of course, the Realtor will take 6%, or $12,000. So you will net $88,000.

Now consider that if you put that $100,000 in the stock market at an average of 10% return for 10 years, and pay $600 a month in rent, or whatever the local equivalent is where homes go for $100,000 today, you just MIGHT have made more than $88,000 in the market, even accounting for the money you wasted in rent.

I’m not going to do that math, but that is the question. What is financially better. In this case, I don’t know, but I am NOT going to take it on faith that tieing up $100,000 in a home is going to outperform a $100,000 investment in the stock market.

And THAT is the crux of this entire discussion. For a given home price, down payment and monthly rent, which combination of numbers makes it worth owning or worth renting. Because if I could rent for $1 a month, I sure as hell won’t buy. If I can own a house for $10, I sure as hell won’t rent.

The financial question for each of us in each of our locations in the USA is, how much does rent cost compared to buying. Is it cheaper to buy and have a home that appreciates, or is it cheaper to rent and invest the balance? Every location is going to have a different answer and it WILL depend on each person’s income and tax liability.

This is pretty complicated. I don’t see a once-size-fits-all simple answer such as “buying a home for cash and having no bank payment is always better than renting.” I just don’t see it. It is a case by case basis.


84 posted on 09/22/2007 1:40:19 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan

rent is definitely throwing away money.

i have wasted so much cash just on apt rent. As soon as i get my financial bearings (im just 24 lol) i am going to aim for making payments on a condo or something

blah. i would NEVER EVER rent a house. ever. never ever.


97 posted on 09/22/2007 2:18:08 AM PDT by modest proposal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson