Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather, CBS, Plus Duke
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 21 September 2007 | John Armor (CongressmanBillybob)

Posted on 09/21/2007 1:59:19 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob

We’ll get to the latest ethically-blind, unintentional humor at Duke University in a moment. Let’s begin with the same thing as demonstrated in the $70 million case Dan Rather just filed against CBS.

The theory of American law is that adversaries – plaintiff and defendant in a civil case – will contest facts, witnesses and experts before the trier of fact (judge or jury) and truth will result. It is not just people like me who’ve been attorneys forever, but also laymen who read the papers, who know this theory sometimes fails in practice.

The theory will fail on purpose in this case, because neither side is interested in proving whether the documents in this case were forgeries that any competent reviewer would have identified at once. CBS wants to prove they were questionable, and shouldn’t have been used. Rather wants to prove they “were not proved false” and therefore should have been used.

I have a personal stake in this. I was part of the small group of bloggers, beginning on FreeRepublic.com right after the Rather broadcast on CBS, who demonstrated that the documents were forgeries, and ridiculously obvious ones. I knew this the moment I read the first post by “Buckhead,” an able lawyer from north of Atlanta.

I was in print media production at the time the “Bush National Guard” documents were allegedly produced by his commanding officer. I knew the only machines at that time which could produce the exact typesetting displayed in these documents cost about $50,000 and were owned only by printing firms. Such a piece of equipment, which cost more than the average house, would not have been available in the HQ of any National Guard unit.

Could the typewriters available at the Guard have possibly produced these documents? Absolutely not. The two typewriters it had then, are known. Neither could match the typesetting of the IBM Selectric, then the most sophisticated typewriter in existence. And even the IBM Selectric, which I worked with in my office, could not have matched these documents.

So, I read Buckhead’s comment, slapped my forehead and said, “Of course. He’s right. These are forgeries. I should have seen it myself.”

Back to the case of Rather v. CBS. Every court of general jurisdiction has the power to appoint Special Masters to examine particular facts in a case and report back. Masters are routinely used when the central issue is highly technical. But there’s another reason to use a Master. When there’s reason to believe both the parties in a case have cause to slant the central facts, the court can and should appoint a Master to make an unbiased examination.

This case is not just about Rather against CBS. It is also about the integrity, or lack of integrity, of the American news media. For about a week after this broadcast, the media circled the wagons to protect both Rather and CBS. Not until the blogosphere forced the issue, did the media change their conclusions.

So, the judge on this case will, in my opinion, be derelict in his duties if he (or she) does not appoint a Special Master in this case. The Master’s assignment should be to determine if the “Guard” documents are forgeries, and if so, how obvious was that? Neither Rather nor CBS may like the results of that examination. But the American press will benefit greatly though unwillingly, from that investigation.

While we are on the subject of “justice,” here’s a brief comment about Duke University. Duke has just announced that it will “invest $1.25 million over the next five years for its law school to establish a center devoted to the promotion of justice in the criminal justice system and the training of lawyers to fight against wrongful convictions.” President Richard H. Brodhead made this stunning announcement this week.

If Duke is honestly interested in promoting justice and avoiding wrongful charges and convictions, it would have spent $36.08 to accomplish the same result immediately, rather than over the next five years. That would be $35.67 to mail a letter to each of the 87 faculty members who published the full-page ad asuming the students to be obviously guilty. The letters would say, “Your services are no longer required.” (There were 88 such professors, but one recanted and apologized after the NC Attorney General dismissed all charges and apologized.)

The last 41 cents would be for President Brodhead to mail a letter to the Board of Trustees, letting them know he was leaving, after his failure to deal honestly with the situation.

In the alternative, Duke could name the new Center the O.J. Simpson Justice Center. The decision rule is ever so simple. Black defendants are innocent. White defendants are guilty. Meanwhile, Duke and CBS are once-proud institutions that are dying a slow suicide. Both forgot the lesson that Scottish poet Robert Burns taught in 1786 in “To a Louse”:

“O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us!”

- 30 -

About the Author: John Armor practiced in the US Supreme Court for 33 years. John_Armor@aya.yale.edu He lives in the 11th District of North Carolina.

- 30 -


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; danrather; dukeuniversity; ojsimpson; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Sometimes three subjects demand attention in the same week. So it was this week with Rather’s suit against CBS, Duke’s attempt to buy its way out of scorn over the lacrosse case, and the latest idiocy from O.J. Simpson. Fortunately, there was a couplet from Robert Burns that tied them all together. And made the point that they are all lousy. LOL.

John / Billybob

1 posted on 09/21/2007 1:59:20 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

> So, the judge on this case will, ...

It’s not going to get that far.
This is probably a Discovery blackmail ploy.

CBS will settle.
They do not want to reveal the chain of custody
of the fake-but-true hoax documents.

See also earlier:
Dan Rather Praises Peter Arnett, Claims ‘Most People’ Believe His Story
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1900267/posts


2 posted on 09/21/2007 2:04:07 PM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Put nicely regarding the Duke 88 minus 1 and President Broadhead. They and the still silent Duke Trustees all need to go.


3 posted on 09/21/2007 2:06:27 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

They do not want to reveal the chain of custody
of the fake-but-true hoax documents.
::::::
I love it. The bent minds of the left and their faux reality — the present and future the way they want it...not the way the real facts have it.

Sadly we have a society and legal system that puts up with this charade of lying lunacy from the left and does not drive home the NEED FOR THE REAL FACTS AND TRUTH. Let us hope this farse between two scumbag parties gets trashed and maybe saves just a little respect for our very liberal legal system.


4 posted on 09/21/2007 2:08:30 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

bump


5 posted on 09/21/2007 2:10:37 PM PDT by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Cavuto gave this lying turd the first 15 minutes of his show. Dan-boy lied all the way, like he has done since 1968.

Nothing but a Cronkite wannabe with a fetish for Baab Woot-wut.


6 posted on 09/21/2007 2:11:03 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I was on the 60 minutes thread that night, I started out fuming mad at Rather’s cheap shot. I went to bed early the next morning grinning from ear to ear.

That was a great night of brainstorming by many people, I just glad I got to witness the de-construction of Gunga Dan.


7 posted on 09/21/2007 2:12:48 PM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Back then... we called the Selectric a 'composer'. Where I worked, it was used solely for camera-ready text.


8 posted on 09/21/2007 2:19:36 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
So, I read Buckhead’s comment, slapped my forehead and said, “Of course. He’s right. These are forgeries. I should have seen it myself.”

Any reasonably attentive person who has looked at business correspondence since 1972 did exactly the same thing. Once that was pointed out and and you looked at the documents, the discussion was over.

I think the reason a lot of reporters are oblivious to that fact is they use typewriters, newsprint and their word processors, which are probably NOT based in Microsoft fonts, so when it is mentioned to them they just get stupid looks on their faces.

He's right, too that CBS will NOT try to answer that question. They like the fact that there are a LOT of stupid people who give the documents the benefit of the doubt.

9 posted on 09/21/2007 2:28:45 PM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I saw a Selectric "font" plated in 14kt gold back in the 70s.

That would be some serious "BLING" today!

WORD UP!

10 posted on 09/21/2007 2:35:20 PM PDT by jaz.357 (...diagonally parked in a parallel universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Which faculty member apologized?


11 posted on 09/21/2007 2:38:11 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great post Congressman.


12 posted on 09/21/2007 2:38:30 PM PDT by jaz.357 (“O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

>> They do not want to reveal the chain of custody
>> of the fake-but-true hoax documents.

> I love it.

Not only will CBS settle, they may ask the real
perps and passers to help pay for it.

If the DNC wants to keep this under the rug,
it’ll cost ‘em.


13 posted on 09/21/2007 2:40:07 PM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Excellent piece, CBB.


14 posted on 09/21/2007 2:45:41 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

What’s missing are the criminal charges.

Dan Rather forged a U.S. military order (for GWB to report to get his medical). He should be in jail.

That’s not freedom of the press, that’s a crime.


15 posted on 09/21/2007 2:53:28 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Funny how everything old is new again! Life has a way of playing nasty tricks on us! I thought this dog was buried, but then again you have O.J. and hiltery’s money scandals raising from the grave! I tell you this is becoming NIGHT of the living dead!
16 posted on 09/21/2007 2:55:03 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Mary Mapes, Rather’s 60 Minutes producer, was in contact with the John Kerry Campaign while the guard story was coming together. She referred Rather’s source for the documents—a screwball, disgruntled former Texas air guardsman—to Kerry campaign adviser Joe Lockhart. Apparently, the Kerry Campaign realized quickly that the documents were bogus but let Rather and Mapes drive off the cliff.

Were Mapes and Rather working as journalists or as DNC political operatives? That’s not hard to answer.

http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2004/09/22/lockhart_contacted_memo_scandal_figure/

17 posted on 09/21/2007 3:20:12 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“. . .Rather’s source for the documents—a screwball, disgruntled former Texas air guardsman—”

Bill Burkett was an ARMY National Guard puke. He was clueless about procedures and paperwork of the AIR National Guard. His only exposure to the Air Guard was incidental, during his tenure at the Texas State Headquarters where there are some Air Guard members sprinkled among mostly Army Guard types.


18 posted on 09/21/2007 3:50:18 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
I don’t recall. I think it was one of the few who were in the hard sciences, where facts are facts and research really means something. Perhaps he was in Engineering, but don’t hold me to that.

John / Billybob

19 posted on 09/21/2007 3:53:58 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (2008 IS HERE, NOW. www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

Sorry. Thanks for the correction.


20 posted on 09/21/2007 3:56:28 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson