This man is a liar.
Flip-flops from the GOP?
Sounds like Hillary. Do whatever lying it takes to get elected. Wait a minute, thats ALL politicians.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
This man is imperfect.
Lying sack of [deleted].
Unless you happen to live in NYC
How convenient, Rudy.
I want to know when is the last time Rudy fired a gun?
I think to some extent I can believe him. When I lived in NY, guns were something people of quality just didn’t own! I mean, you were supposed to call the police for protection, right?
When I came to FL to live, my views did a 180. I began to understand the 2nd amendment, and my conservatism evolved.
However, my feelings towards guns now revolve on the principles in the Constitution. I would like Guiliani to take a more “principled’ stand on guns, as our right, not just what is more “practical” at a given time or place.
“”Your right to bear arms is based on a reasonable degree of safety,” he said.”
NO. It is based on the US Constitution Rudy, it has absolutly NOTHING to do with a “reasonable degree of safety”.
Hell, if you can’t see that you are worse than I thought.
“Your right to bear arms is based on a reasonable degree of safety,”
No Rudy, the right to KEEP and Bear arms is a right given to us by our Creator and recognized by the Constitution as a God given right.
It’s there to allow us to resist, by force, your dumb behind if you ever become president and decide to implement the rest of your leftist liberal ideas.
No other reason.
Know what? If elected President I could easily see Rooty evolve right back into his gun grabbing ways. Oh sure, there’d be some minor event upon which he would base his change of heart, but I believe he would be searching for just such an event to then declare that “drastic times calls for drastic measures” and then proceed to push a willing Dem Congress for gun control laws.
You just know I’m right about this.
Great, Rudy. Upset both the Second Amendment crowd and the Creationism crowd.
This [seasonal] pro-2ndA is a "survival" technique.
“Your right to bear arms is based on a reasonable degree of safety,” he said.
Or based upon if you are a sportsman or hunter, or if you really need a firearm.
Or depending upon whether or not I change my mind again.
If not, all the “evolution” on this subject is worthless.
I’m not a one-issue voter, but Rudy is WRONG on so many issues... He’s just a 1980s style Democrat disguising himself as a Republican.
***”Your right to bear arms is based on a reasonable degree of safety,” he said.***
My right to bear arms came to me from God, which the Founding Fathers firmly believed. I just choose not to exercise that right right now, as I don’t have the immediate need for a gun.
What a load.
The right to bear arms (which to me means "carry them around with you as you go about your daily business") is a right that pre-exists and no government has the legitimate right to abrogate.
Since most gun laws on the books are un-Constitutional anyway, any enforcement of said laws is not a good thing.
If he were serious about the 2A, he would be campaigning to dismantle the gun laws on the books.
/soapbox