The most obvious location would be in the so-called "hell-hole" in the cabin floor. The return of the B-17 ball turret!
This is not for the MV-22 that the Marines will soon deploy to Iraq. At this time it is just the CV-22 for Special Ops.

1 posted on
09/21/2007 8:36:36 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
To: Yo-Yo
I saw one of these flying a few months ago. WAAAaayyyyy cool.
2 posted on
09/21/2007 8:38:58 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Yo-Yo
Seen a few of them flying around here...............
3 posted on
09/21/2007 8:38:58 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: Yo-Yo
Both the USMC and SOCOM are considering a range of weapon types, from a 7.62mm minigun to a .50-calibre machine gun to a grenade launcher.Why not all three? The more rounds per minute the better.
6 posted on
09/21/2007 8:42:44 AM PDT by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: Yo-Yo
Chin, side and rear mounted chain guns.
9 posted on
09/21/2007 8:45:11 AM PDT by
GBA
( God Bless America!)
To: Yo-Yo
A remote ball turret with one of these?

11 posted on
09/21/2007 8:46:03 AM PDT by
traditional1
( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
To: Yo-Yo
I worry that the MV-22’s carbon fiber props are too vulnerable to light arms fire compared to more traditional metal propellers/rotors.
12 posted on
09/21/2007 8:49:52 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Yo-Yo
It would need to either be low profile or retractable. It doesn’t look like there is a lot of ground clearance.
13 posted on
09/21/2007 8:50:49 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: Yo-Yo
Seems like a couple of .50’s sticking out either side would be pretty good too. Maybe a minigun someplace. :-)
On another topic, I’d really like to see the Coast Guard pick up some of these. Seems like an ideal long range SAR platform. Can cover a lot of territory in a hurry and carry a lot of stuff out, and people back.
16 posted on
09/21/2007 8:52:24 AM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Yo-Yo
I would suggest a cockpit controlled via HUD bottom mounted turret employing the M134 Gatling 7.62mm, and either the M242 25mm chaingun or the M230 30mm chaingun.
17 posted on
09/21/2007 9:10:36 AM PDT by
Camel Joe
(liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
To: Yo-Yo
“that can fire on targets at all angles relative to the aircraft’s position. “
Call me crazy, but I think there may just be a few angles with traverse and elevation limits.
24 posted on
09/21/2007 10:13:53 AM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: Yo-Yo
I suspect the Marines want a gunship for close in support when these babies go in to make deliveries. Right now the ramp mounted .50 is not very practical for troop protection. But this might help with one mounted on both sides of the craft as a gunship and it won't matter which configuration they were in.

38 posted on
09/21/2007 11:18:58 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Keyes/Paul '08 - When you can't get crazy enough.)
To: Yo-Yo
the US Marine Corps has installed a .50-calibre gun on the tail ramp of its MV-22 fleet,If only they had a Ma Deuce for a ramp gun. The MV-22 is armed with the M240D.
Staff Sgt. Theodore K. Mahiai, a VMX-22 crew chief and one of the first to fire the Ospreys new, rear-mounted M-240 weapon system, scans the area for possible targets during a flight Aug. 15.
Photo by: Lance Cpl. Samuel D. White
Photo ID: 2006822115214
Submitting Unit: MCAS New River
Photo Date:08/22/2006
To: Yo-Yo
That’s a scary machine, especially if you are right underneath it. Because that’s a dangerous place, considering gravity being the way it is.
56 posted on
09/21/2007 6:40:40 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Tagline:(Optional, printed after your name on post0:)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson