Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dubya-M-Dees; Gabz

“Well over 70% of males carry the HPV virus, so it is a huge risk.”

Then why wasn’t a vaccine developed for boys who are spreading the disease?

But, I think you’re missing the entire point. The point was that many states were MANDATING this vaccine...and taking kickbacks from Merck to boot!

If a PARENT wants to give this to their child, it should be THEIR choice. Schools and states were MANDATING that young girls have this shot prior to being allowed to go to school. No shots for the boys, though.

It’s a Nanny State issue, not so much whether the vaccine is useful or not.


31 posted on 09/20/2007 4:39:16 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Diana in Wisconsin
Then why wasn’t a vaccine developed for boys who are spreading the disease?

Because women are at greater risk. If the vaccine had been approved for males first, skittish parents would refuse to vaccinate many of the boys, the girls would get it from them, and we'd be exactly where we started. At least this way, some girls will be protected. Hopefully, it'll be approved for men soon, since they're at risk for penile cancer, anal cancer, and head-and-neck cancer--not to mention passing the virus on to a woman who was not vaccinated. (Perhaps because of her skittish parents?)

131 posted on 09/21/2007 6:24:09 AM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson