Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Then why wasn’t a vaccine developed for boys who are spreading the disease?

Because women are at greater risk. If the vaccine had been approved for males first, skittish parents would refuse to vaccinate many of the boys, the girls would get it from them, and we'd be exactly where we started. At least this way, some girls will be protected. Hopefully, it'll be approved for men soon, since they're at risk for penile cancer, anal cancer, and head-and-neck cancer--not to mention passing the virus on to a woman who was not vaccinated. (Perhaps because of her skittish parents?)

131 posted on 09/21/2007 6:24:09 AM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Caesar Soze

I’ll believe it when I see it. The goal of Communism is to destroy the family through promoting promiscuity and easy sex. The NOW Hags ran with this in the 60’s and 70’s and now the chickens are coming home to roost. Would fear of contracting a STD be a part of a pre-teens life were it not for them having to deal with the death of their parents marriages (when their “liberated” Moms took flight, as did mine), or not having a Dad in the home in the first place? (I have a terrific Father. It’s made a world of difference in my life.)

Young girls have been the target of brainwashing for decades, and being one that lived through ‘The Sexual Revolution’ we were sold a bunch of lies by the left.

This issue is much, much bigger than a mandated vaccine, pimped by a pharm company.


134 posted on 09/21/2007 6:33:09 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson